On 01/06/2018 10:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Are there some instructions how a maintainer would go about porting a package?
Something like "dnf uninstall blah && dnf install libtirpc-devel; build
your package; verify that the resulting package does not depend on foo"?
$ mock -r f
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Rawhide 20180107.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Dear list,
I have submitted ddupdate [1] and need a review. I'm ready to make one
in return, preferably a python or a C/C++ package.
ddupdate is a simple, python3 application.
Cheers!
--alec
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532023
___
I don't have a good way to reproduce this right now, but I just recently
figured out that after upgrading from F26 to 27 that my modifications to
/etc/ssh/sshd_config were reverted.
I only have one computer I allow ssh into from the internet and for that
reason I don't allow root login over ssh (P
On 07/01/2018 14:41, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I have submitted ddupdate [1] and need a review. I'm ready to make one
> in return, preferably a python or a C/C++ package.
>
> ddupdate is a simple, python3 application.
>
> Cheers!
>
Please, review seqan2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/128 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180105.n.0):
ID: 184683 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/184683
ID: 184698 Test: i386
Good day, everyone!
My name is Abhiram, and I go by "Axel" online.
I recently graduated college with a bachelor's degree in technology with a
focus on software engineering and IT.
I've been a full time Linux user for about 11-ish years having started my
journey on good ol' Fedora core 9.
Recen
Hi all,
within the whole Meltdown and Spectre story I realized that Koji pushes
even security updates to batched only, not directly to stable. In
concrete case we have the firefox update [1], which already received 10
positive karma and many users complaining that it takes so long to get
it out as
On 01/07/2018 01:38 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> within the whole Meltdown and Spectre story I realized that Koji pushes
> even security updates to batched only, not directly to stable. In
The critera for bypassing batched is if the update is marked "urgent".
> concrete case we have
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The critera for bypassing batched is if the update is marked "urgent".
The problem is, this appears to be insufficient.
I really don't understand why we do this "batched" thing to begin with.
Users who want to batch updates have always been able to do it, GNOME
Software wil
>> within the whole Meltdown and Spectre story I realized that Koji pushes
>> even security updates to batched only, not directly to stable. In
>
> The critera for bypassing batched is if the update is marked "urgent".
Or once you push it stable and it's queued for batched the maintainer
then has
11 matches
Mail list logo
