On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:33:20AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The thing is, the question is whether Firefox even still qualifies as Free
> Software at all. We disagree with those actions for a reason, i.e., because
> they are attacks on users' freedom!
It's Free Software, under every definitio
On 12/21/2017 04:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, no, it's not exactly the same. Using xhost in this way has been a
(grudgingly) documented workaround for Wayland's restrictions for some
time now:
For what it's worth, I also use it for non-root accounts other than my
login account, for test
Hi All,
As part of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife
I'm pushing a change to the Fedora Rawhide kernel to enable the new
med_power_with_dipm sata link powermanagement policy by default on
mobile Intel chipsets (Laptops, NuCs, etc.).
The good news about this change
On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 07:01 -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote:
>
> Especially since Fedora's maintainers *already* compile it, including
> changing some of the defaults. What's a couple more?
AIUI, Mozilla doesn't actually like downstreams changing too much in
Firefox. I don't know exactly where thei
Hi Hans,
thank you very much for working on this! Forgot to give some feedback
before… I tested your packages for Fedora 27 with my ThinkPad T450s with
Crucial MX100 (512GB variant, one of the affected SSDs failing with
min_power setting) and TLP. According to powertop it saves about 1.1W in
idle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:17 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 07:01 -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > Especially since Fedora's maintainers *already* compile it, including
> > changing some of the defaults. What's a couple more?
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 30/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171221.n.0):
ID: 181978 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedor
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:17:27AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Especially since Fedora's maintainers *already* compile it, including
> > changing some of the defaults. What's a couple more?
> AIUI, Mozilla doesn't actually like downstreams changing too much in
> Firefox. I don't know exactl
On Friday, December 22, 2017, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 07:01 -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> >
> > Especially since Fedora's maintainers *already* compile it, including
> > changing some of the defaults. What's a couple more?
>
> AIUI, Mozilla doesn't actually like downstrea
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 04:36:37AM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> Same for fedora - if you want to use the trademark.
Yes. It's not an unreasonable request. (Although Fedora does offer the
secondary "Fedora Remix" mark, and Firefox doesn't have anything
equvalent that I'm aware of.)
--
Matthew Miller
10 matches
Mail list logo
