On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 07:32:09AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:44:49PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > OK, it seems that everybody commented. The part about allowing
> > proven packagers more freedom with the package was controversial,
> > so
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 17 November 2017 at 13:30, Randy Barlow
> wrote:
>> Greetings fellow Fedorans!
>>
>> During today's FESCo meeting[0], there was discussion around a proposal
>> to increase the freeze period from 2 weeks to 3 weeks[1]. Several
>> m
For a long time we have an issue with readiness of Release notes for a
release. To solve this issue me and @bex met and we came up with a
proposal for a Changes Policy [2] addendum. As I would like to have
people from different teams (Devel, QA, Doc, Trans, ...) to review
this proposal and I do not
Hi,
All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their fonts
at wiki based on the template[1] according to the package
lifecycle[2]. however some of them doesn't have. so just tried to pick
them up and inform you to get one there.
Please see the following source package list which may
So is it any final decision about start use by default --as-needed in
linker options?
Looking again on whole discussion across this thread and on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/3 I
don't see any arguments against start use --as-needed by default so
looks like onl
Hello,
trying to reach broader audience and get some feedback, hopefully resolving the
issue concerning Fedora Developer Portal[1]. Specifically its content- C#
IDEs[1] (generated from its github source[2]).
Changes requesting a recommendation of proprietary software on Fedora are
postponed[3]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:26 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> So is it any final decision about start use by default --as-needed in
> linker options?
Can you link Change Proposal you (or someone else) submitted? I have not heard
anything about that.
>
Hi,
I noticed that if I installed the original libqxt version, it would come to a
collision between the library names of libqxt-qt5 and libqxt, because they use
the same library names.
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/GoldenCheetah/libqxt-qt5.spec
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Pac
On Tuesday, 21 November 2017 at 11:14, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their fonts
> at wiki based on the template[1] according to the package
> lifecycle[2]. however some of them doesn't have. so just tried to pick
> them up and inform you to
On 11/21/2017 11:14 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> zdohnal ghostscript-fonts
>
ghostscript-fonts is deprecated by urw-fonts and urw-base35-fonts in
Fedora 27+ and is going to be retired for them, so I won't create wiki
page for it.
--
Zdenek Dohnal
Associate Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech - B
On 21 November 2017 at 10:43, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:26 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> So is it any final decision about start use by default --as-needed in
>> linker options?
>
> Can you link Change Proposal you (or s
On 21 November 2017 at 04:22, Jan Kurik wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>> On 17 November 2017 at 13:30, Randy Barlow
>> wrote:
>>> Greetings fellow Fedorans!
>>>
>>> During today's FESCo meeting[0], there was discussion around a proposal
>>> to increase
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>> On 17 November 2017 at 13:30, Randy Barlow
>> wrote:
>>> Greetings fellow Fedorans!
>>>
>>> During today's FESCo meeting[0], there was discussion around a proposal
>>> to incre
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 01:54:13PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 21 November 2017 at 10:43, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:26 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> >> So is it any final decision about start use b
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> But we don't do per-branch privileges. So either you have commit
> privileges on all branches, or you don't.
>
> Perhaps you could include some details about what leads you to believe
> that you have privileges on one branch but not the others.
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 90/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171120.n.0):
ID: 172599 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedo
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171121.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171121.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 8
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages
On 11/21/2017 04:12 PM, David Tardon wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 01:54:13PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
On 21 November 2017 at 10:43, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:26 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
So is it any final decision
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 11/21/2017 04:12 PM, David Tardon wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 01:54:13PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> > > On 21 November 2017 at 10:43, Igor Gnatenko
> > > wrote:
> > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > > Hash
Missing expected images:
Docker_base docker x86_64
Server dvd arm
Failed openQA tests: 26/94 (x86_64), 4/19 (i386)
ID: 172775 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/172775
ID: 172776 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https
On 21 November 2017 at 16:36, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[..]
>> > > > Counting numbers of affected packages by guessing is very bad idea.
>> > >
>> > > Call it educated guess if you want.
>> >
>> > You know, there is a way to get more reliable data: do scratch builds of
>> > all Fedora packages an
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 18:09 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 21 November 2017 at 16:36, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> [..]
> > > > > > Counting numbers of affected packages by guessing is very bad idea.
> > > > >
> > > > > Call it educated guess if
While experimenting with some refactoring, I noticed that /usr/include/cpuidle.h
was being picked up by the glob for kernel-headers. This is kind of unusual
because /usr/include/cpufreq.h exists in kernel-tools-libs-devel yet both
come out of install from cpupower tools. This header really belongs
24 matches
Mail list logo
