Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

On 2017-09-25, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > /*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200: >> It's an interesting idea but then it would become quite hard to check >> if there is a mitm attack of some sort. With the current process, at >> least the packager has the possibility to c

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 07:18:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-09-25, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > > /*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200: > >> It's an interesting idea but then it would become quite hard to check > >> if there is a mitm attack of some sort. With th

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

On 2017-09-26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 07:18:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2017-09-25, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: >> > /*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200: >> >> It's an interesting idea but then it would become quite hard to check >> >>

Re: Package add request

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:15:25PM -, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > Here it is: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/srakitnican/default/build/607839/ > > Still not sure about naming issue, package wants to name files ZeGrapher, I > called the package zegrapher, debian maintainers go a ste

Re: Packages giveaway

On 09/20/2017 09:57 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: Clearly this is not working very well, so I'm giving up all my Point of Contacts position on packages. I will try to work on them, even if I'm not th PoC anymore, but I don't want to keep those packages stuck due to my (un)availability.

[Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 27 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the cu

Fedora 27-20170925.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 1/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20170924.n.0): ID: 146763 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproje

Flock 2018 Bidding Open

The new streamlined bidding process for Flock 2018 is now open. See the community blog post here: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/flock-2018-bidding-open/ for all the details. The process has been made simpler to encourage more bidding. regards, The Flock Bid Committee ___

Fedora 27 Beta 1.3 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 16/126 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27 Beta 1.2): ID: 147059 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.or

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:50:11 + (UTC), you wrote: >On 2017-09-26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 07:18:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: >>> A packager is responsible for reviewing the code before uploading it to the >>> Fedora infrastructure. It does not mattter whether the

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:38:07PM +, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > If data volume is expensive or difficult for you, you could > look into renting a (virtual) private server and then devel- > oping there via ssh. Offers usually start at less than > $ 5,-/month. (I'm not aware of free solutions; i

Fwd: Removal of dependencies on net-tools

Hi, So net-tools has been deprecated a long time at this point with numerous known issues - especially as we enter an IPv6 world. There was an initial discussion a few months back as can be reviewed here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists. fedoraproject.org/thread/OATM2PQ

Fwd: Removal of dependencies on net-tools

Hi, So net-tools has been deprecated a long time at this point with numerous known issues - especially as we enter an IPv6 world. There was an initial discussion a few months back as can be reviewed here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fe doraproject.org/thread/OATM2PQ

Re: Improving Linux laptop battery life: Testers Wanted

This message may be useful to others having my similar problem. On a Thinkpad X220, after having booted the custom kernel, running [root@machine]# cat /sys/class/scsi_host/host0/link_power_management_policy I get max_performance instead of med_power_with_dipm Here some machine details [root

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

* Gerald Henriksen [26/09/2017 09:02] : > > That may be fine for any packagers who are actually paid to package > (though even then I would have my doubts that every line of source has > been checked), but it is clearly an impossible task in terms of time > required for all the volunteer packagers.

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 05:30:50PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > That may be fine for any packagers who are actually paid to package > > (though even then I would have my doubts that every line of source has > > been checked), but it is clearly an impossible task in terms of time > > required f

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

/*Matthew Miller*/ wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:28:07 -0400: On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:38:07PM +, Tim Landscheidt wrote: If data volume is expensive or difficult for you, you could look into renting a (virtual) private server and then devel- oping there via ssh. Offers usually start at le

Re: Fwd: Removal of dependencies on net-tools

On 26.9.2017 15:56, James Hogarth wrote: Hi, So net-tools has been deprecated a long time at this point with numerous known issues - especially as we enter an IPv6 world. There was an initial discussion a few months back as can be reviewed here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:08:18PM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > However, is it really that hard/problematic/.. for Fedora to support > such a use case? Certainly it'd be much more convenient for > packagers if such a small (at least, this is how I look at it!) > enhancement is made. It's not

Re: Fwd: Removal of dependencies on net-tools

On 26 Sep 2017 5:41 pm, "Miro Hrončok" wrote: On 26.9.2017 15:56, James Hogarth wrote: > Hi, > > So net-tools has been deprecated a long time at this point with numerous > known issues - especially as we enter an IPv6 world. > > There was an initial discussion a few months back as can be reviewe

Re: Fwd: Removal of dependencies on net-tools

Once upon a time, James Hogarth said: > You're correct that this isn't covering BR situations but I didn't want the > scope of this to blow out to the less reasonable. > > First phase let's get the package off systems where it's not absolutely > required or requested by the user... > > Then BR c

Re: Package add request

/*Samuel Rakitničan*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 23:15:25 -: Here it is: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/srakitnican/default/build/607839/ Still not sure about naming issue, package wants to name files ZeGrapher, I called the package zegrapher, debian maintainers go a step further

Re: Package add request

/*Samuel Rakitničan*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 23:15:25 -: Here it is: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/srakitnican/default/build/607839/ Still not sure about naming issue, package wants to name files ZeGrapher, I called the package zegrapher, debian maintainers go a step further

Fedora Rawhide-20170926.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 81/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170925.n.0): ID: 147226 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://

Re: Fwd: Removal of dependencies on net-tools

On 26 Sep 2017 6:37 pm, "Chris Adams" wrote: Once upon a time, James Hogarth said: > You're correct that this isn't covering BR situations but I didn't want the > scope of this to blow out to the less reasonable. > > First phase let's get the package off systems where it's not absolutely > requi

Self Introduction: Sergey Avseyev

Hi Fedora Community My name is Sergey Avseyev. I live in Minsk, Belarus and work for Couchbase. My main interests are revolving around networking and databases. At Couchbase I work on libcouchbase (the client library with C interface) and PHP extension built atop of libcouchbase. I have build and

Re: Self Introduction: Sergey Avseyev

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Sergey Avseyev wrote: > I currently have a package submitted for review: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495004 (please be gentle) > and need a sponsor. Sorry for this. This is *not* my package, it is from Bennie Joubert :) libcouchbase is here: h

Re: Self Introduction: Sergey Avseyev

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 21:48 +0300, Sergey Avseyev wrote: > Hi Fedora Community Hey, > > My name is Sergey Avseyev. I live in Minsk, Belarus and work for > Couchbase. > > My main interests are revolving around networking and databases. > At Couchbase

Re: Removal of dependencies on net-tools

On 26 September 2017 at 19:43, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 26.09.2017 um 20:39 schrieb James Hogarth: > >> >> >> On 26 Sep 2017 6:37 pm, "Chris Adams" > li...@cmadams.net>> wrote: >> >> Once upon a time, James Hogarth > > said: >> > You're correct th

Fedora 27-20170926.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 14/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20170925.n.0): ID: 147363 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedorapr

Re: Package add request

> "HV" == Hedayat Vatankhah writes: HV> I'd say to stick with upstream naming, which is the Fedora HV> way. Changing the names to lower case is a must in Debian, they HV> simply don't allow upper case letters to be in package names. The HV> developer clearly prefers ZeGrapher, so I think acco

Re: Self Introduction: Sergey Avseyev

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495985 >> > Quickly checked spec file and gave some notes 😉 Thank you, Igor. I have fixed all your notes and updated the ticket ___ devel mailing list

Re: Package add request

On 27 Sep 2017 04:50, "Jason L Tibbitts III" wrote: > "HV" == Hedayat Vatankhah writes: HV> I'd say to stick with upstream naming, which is the Fedora HV> way. Changing the names to lower case is a must in Debian, they HV> simply don't allow upper case letters to be in package names. The HV