Re: F28 System Wide Change: Deprecate TCP wrappers

On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 06:15 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > > = Proposed System Wide Change: Deprecate TCP wrappers = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers > > > > Change owner(s): > > * Jakub Jelen > > > > TCP wrappers

Bugzilla auto-CC

There was some discussion a while back about Bugzilla auto-CC https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6315 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-terminal has state "Unwatch" for me, and has since definitely yesterday, perhaps longer, but I was automatically added in CC to https://bugzilla

Re: Bugzilla auto-CC

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:08:38AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > There was some discussion a while back about Bugzilla auto-CC > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6315 > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-terminal has state "Unwatch" > for me, and has since definitely yesterd

Main admin for packages

Just changing the subject as it in fact does not concern only nodejs packages: On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:52:40PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > I recently found out that some packages were not correctly migrated from pkgdb > > Looking at a couple of ones in pkgdb,

Re: Curious build-id conflict while installing a package

Hi, Sorry, I missed this earlier. Please let me know if it hasn't been resolved yet. On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 12:04 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > While reviewing a package, I encountered an issue during the > installatiion phase of the review: > > > Error: Transaction check error: > >  file

Improving Linux laptop battery life: Testers Wanted

Hi All, My next project for Red Hat is to work on improving Linux laptop battery life. Part of the (hopefully) low hanging fruit here is using kernel tunables to enable more runtime powermanagement. My first target here is SATA Link Power Management (LPM) which, as Matthew Garrett blogged about 2

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Deprecate TCP wrappers

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 06:15 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> So, I'm a comaintainer of a package that uses libwrap and such >> (stunnel), and I don't particularly want to lose the tcp_wrappers >> support in it, because I use stunnel in containers t

Re: Any plans for completing the go 1.9 rebase (to stable 1.9)?

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > According to the Change for F27 [0], all golang packages have been rebuilt > against golang 1.9beta2. In the meantime, go 1.9 stable has been released > upstream (Aug. 24, 2017) [1]. > > I suspect that some of the issues I am having wit

Re: Improving Linux laptop battery life: Testers Wanted

Hi Hans, I can provide ~10 different Thinkpad models to test your code. Looking forward to start! Have a nice day ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: OCaml / aarch64 / binutils / coq mess

More news. https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/1330 Upstream came up with a different fix. It's slower since every reference (even within compilation units) now goes through the GOT, but it's likely to be safer and it's the one they went with for the future 4.06 release. Therefore I have add

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Deprecate TCP wrappers

On Do, 14.09.17 07:25, Nico Kadel-Garcia (nka...@gmail.com) wrote: > And... "let's replace something that is stable, long supported, and > works across multiple platforms with an untested new systemd feature > for which stable software will have to be rewritten and thus a fork > maintained for Lin

Re: Curious build-id conflict while installing a package

On jeudi 14 septembre 2017 11:56:21 CEST Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry, I missed this earlier. > Please let me know if it hasn't been resolved yet. > > On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 12:04 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > While reviewing a package, I encountered an issue during the > > > > i

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-09-14 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2017-09-14 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2017-09-14 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2017-09-14 1

Pagure token only 2 months?!

Hi, I recently added new package to Fedora and went through the new process which uses: fedrepo-req-branch See https://pagure.io/fedrepo_req/blob/master/f/README.md I have been surprised that you first need to configure this tool. And put Pagure API token in config (manually). And this config

Fedora 27-20170912.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 18/137 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20170910.n.0): ID: 140927 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz

Re: OCaml / aarch64 / binutils / coq mess

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > More news. > > https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/1330 > > Upstream came up with a different fix. It's slower since every > reference (even within compilation units) now goes through the GOT, > but it's likely to be safer and it's th

Converting selinux commands into a policy file

I have been working on packaging the Ubiquity Unifi controller software for Fedora and EPEL and the package actually works pretty well. I've created a review request on RPM Fusion non-free since it's not FOSS and I've only been given permission to package/distribute. Currently I handle the selinu

Re: Debuginfo problem with fpc

Thanks! That got it... I'll do official builds here in a bit. Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Converting selinux commands into a policy file

On 09/14/2017 10:25 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: I have been working on packaging the Ubiquity Unifi controller software for Fedora and EPEL and the package actually works pretty well. I've created a review request on RPM Fusion non-free since it's not FOSS and I've only been given permission to pa

[Pagure] Allow deleting and force-push for auxiliary branches

Hello folks, I have stumbled upon this several times before, and today again. And since we have switched to Pagure, I think it's time to discuss this (again?)... :) IMHO, the package maintainers should be allowed to make, delete and force-push into private/auxiliary branches. Disabling completely

armv7hl: Lazarus installed buy lazbuild not found

I'm trying to build a new version of cqrlog for rawhide and only the arm build failed: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.F7VXBm + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd cqrlog-2.1.0 + make -j4 lazbuild --ws=gtk2 --pcp=/tmp/.lazarus src/cqrlog.lpi make: lazbuild: Command not found m

Re: armv7hl: Lazarus installed buy lazbuild not found

On 09/14/2017 05:31 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I'm trying to build a new version of cqrlog for rawhide and only the arm build failed: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.F7VXBm + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd cqrlog-2.1.0 + make -j4 lazbuild --ws=gtk2 --pcp=/tmp/.lazarus src/

Re: armv7hl: Lazarus installed buy lazbuild not found

Il 14/09/2017 17:54, Florian Weimer ha scritto: Looks like FPC and thus lazarus was never updated to actually follow the armhfp ABI. 8-{ [...] nevra | name +- ccdcie

Re: armv7hl: Lazarus installed buy lazbuild not found

I've now seen that FPC is failing to compile since last mass rebuild... I'm going to open a ticket asking the maintainer to fix that. Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedor

Schedule for Tomorrow's FESCo Meeting (2017-09-15)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-09-15 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below ca

Packaging golang.org/x/sys/unix?

Hi, I'm investigating packaging prometheus.io (or at least its snmp exporter) As usual for a new ecosystem like go, packaging any complex app requires packaging a deep dependency tree. Right now I'm stuck on golang.org/x/sys/unix (go system integration on linux) https://go.googlesource.com/sys

fedrepo-req is complaining about cookies

Hi, I am trying to add new package to fedora, I did: $ fedrepo-req wsjtx -t 1487776 -m monitoring Error: The Bugzilla ticket could not be verified. The following error was encountered: My token was valid, but I requested new one and it still doesn't work. fedrepo-req-1.6.0-3.fc25.noarch Also

Re: fedrepo-req is complaining about cookies

- Original Message - > Hi, > > I am trying to add new package to fedora, I did: > > $ fedrepo-req wsjtx -t 1487776 -m monitoring > Error: The Bugzilla ticket could not be verified. The following error was > encountered: have expired. You may login again to get new cookies or a new toke

Re: Providing ABI/API assurances for the base runtime in Fedora.

On 09/06/2017 03:50 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-09-06, Petr Pisar wrote: >> Does it mean that when a need for a new feature arises, e.g. adding >> getrandom(3) into glibc >> we will produce >> a new platform stream distinct from the GA stre

Re: fedrepo-req is complaining about cookies

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 13:18 -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > Hi, Hi, > > I am trying to add new package to fedora, I did: > > $ fedrepo-req wsjtx -t 1487776 -m monitoring > Error: The Bugzilla ticket could not be verified. The following error > wa

Re: Packaging golang.org/x/sys/unix?

On jeudi 14 septembre 2017 19:02:12 CEST nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: > Hi, > > I'm investigating packaging prometheus.io (or at least its snmp exporter) > > As usual for a new ecosystem like go, packaging any complex app requires > packaging a deep dependency tree. > Right now I'm stuck

Re: [modularity] Modularizing the world fast and iteratively

On 09/07/2017 01:50 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > The per-symbol API versioning in RPM was proposed five years ago by > ALT Linux people. It actually works well in their RPM fork. > > An isolated version of that code is available at https://github.com/svpv/rpmss > > You may want to read http://r

Re: Packaging golang.org/x/sys/unix?

De: "Robert-André Mauchin" >golang(golang.org/x/sys/unix) is already packaged… can't you add it as a > dependency? Oh, nice, thanks a lot for the pointer. Seems it was missing on the mirror I build against, need to investigate why I was really not looking forward untangling this ;) Regards,

Re: fedrepo-req is complaining about cookies

- Original Message - > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 13:18 -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > Hi, > Hi, > > > > I am trying to add new package to fedora, I did: > > > > $ fedrepo-req wsjtx -t 1487776 -m monitoring > > Error: The Bugzilla t

Merging two updates

Hello, Is it possible to merge updates in bodhi? The reasons is packages depends from the same source. For example, LuxRender and YafaRay have separate updates but depend of Blender and I would like to merge them. Thanks -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: ht

Re: armv7hl: Lazarus installed buy lazbuild not found

On 09/14/2017 06:30 PM, Mattia Verga wrote: I've now seen that FPC is failing to compile since last mass rebuild... I'm going to open a ticket asking the maintainer to fix that. The bug is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491788 It looks like we forgot to switch FPC from EABI

Re: fedrepo-req is complaining about cookies

On 09/14/2017 02:19 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 13:18 -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: >>> Hi, >> Hi, >>> >>> I am trying to add new package to fedora, I did: >>> >>> $ fedrepo-req

Fedora Rawhide-20170914.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 26/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170913.n.0):

Re: Merging two updates

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to merge updates in bodhi? The reasons is packages > depends from the same source. For example, LuxRender and YafaRay have > separate updates but depend of Blender and I would like to merge them. No, you need to

Re: Merging two updates

On 14/09/17 12:43 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is it possible to merge updates in bodhi? The reasons is packages >> depends from the same source. For example, LuxRender and YafaRay have >> separate updates but depend of Ble

Fedora 27 Beta status is NO-GO

Release status of the Fedora 27 Beta is NO-GO. The next Go/No-Go meeting is planned on Thursday, Sep 21st. The Beta release slips for one week however due to “Rain date feature” we are not going to slip the Final GA yet. For more information please check the F27 Beta Readiness meeting minutes [1]

Re: Schedule for Tomorrow's FESCo Meeting (2017-09-15)

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Adam Miller wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto > > or

Re: fedrepo-req is complaining about cookies

On 09/14/2017 10:18 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to add new package to fedora, I did: > > $ fedrepo-req wsjtx -t 1487776 -m monitoring > Error: The Bugzilla ticket could not be verified. The following error was > encountered: have expired. You may login again to get new co

Fedora 27-20170914.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 23/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20170913.n.0): ID: 142168 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso

Re: Main admin for nodejs packages

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > I recently found out that some packages were not correctly migrated from > pkgdb > > Looking at a couple of ones in pkgdb, it seem the issue is basically that > a group > has commit access to the package but n

Re: [modularity] Modularizing the world fast and iteratively

On 09/07/2017 08:50 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: You may want to read http://rpm5.org/community/rpm-devel/5356.html and associated thread discussion to understand how it all works, but overall it is much better suited to cover per-symbol export and import between ELF objects. The ABI requirements

Re: Bugzilla auto-CC

On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 17:58 +, Ralph Bean wrote: > I started a full run to reset all projects, but it takes quite a > while to complete. Should be all fixed up when that's done. Hi, a bug filled yesterday [1] has still the group expanded, or whatever. Thus the change didn't take into

Re: Merging two updates

On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 20:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Is it possible to merge updates in bodhi? The reasons is packages > > depends from the same source. For example, LuxRender and YafaRay have > > separate update