Why the updated version of gjs 1.49 was not released yet? F27+ users
apparently still fight gjs crashes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456293
Vít
Dne 5.9.2017 v 16:02 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
> Hi all,
>
> It's GNOME 3.25.92 release this week, which is going to be quickly
> follo
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> While you (and others) may well know the name of the software you like
> for a given task, new people will not have that knowledge.
Isn't that really a discoverability problem?
I could imagine having menu items pointing to best-i
On 09/11/2017 10:49 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Why the updated version of gjs 1.49 was not released yet? F27+ users
> apparently still fight gjs crashes:
It needs mozjs52 that we don't have in Fedora yet.
--
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> > While you (and others) may well know the name of the software you like
> > for a given task, new people will not have that knowledge.
>
> Isn't that really a discove
Reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490351
I am thinking about proposing this as Blocker Bug/PrioritizedBug, it's
pretty significant regression compared to current state on Fedora 26.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 09/11/2017 10:49 AM, Vít Ondruch
I changed verilator's license tag from (GPLv2) to (LGPLv3 or
Artistic 2.0) in Fedora 28 to be in line with the reality.
-- Petr
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Saturday, September 9, 2017 2:28:52 PM CEST jack smith wrote:
> Would you like to consider to provide a less "bloated" KDE spin ? Here is the
> softs I suggest to remove to have a much cleaner base experience :
> kolourpaint kruler qupzilla ktorrent krusader kgpg krfb kmines kpat kmahjongg
> krd
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> > While you (and others) may well know the name of the software you like
> > for a given task, new people will not have that knowledge.
>
> Isn't that really a discover
lör 2017-09-09 klockan 05:00 + skrev Globe Trotter:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your detailed response. However, I tried replacing
>
> AC_CHECK_LIB(ssl, SSL_library_init, ssl_ok=yes, ssl_ok=no, -lcrypto)
>
> with
>
> AC_CHECK_LIB(ssl, SSL_writet, ssl_ok=yes, ssl_ok=no, -lcrypto)
>
> but I get
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 10:39 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 09/08/2017 02:40 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> > > The currently implementation of the Bodhi CLI subclasses
> > > fedora.client.OpenIdBaseClient, which does not support kerberos:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/bl
I would like to request review of Release Blocking deliverables for
Fedora 27 release. I aware of the fact we are already in Beta Freeze
and I apologize for not having the list of deliverables ready in
advance. The list is available on usual location [1]. Please let me
know in case there is any dis
On 11 September 2017 at 06:45, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>> While you (and others) may well know the name of the software you like
>> for a given task, new people will not have that knowledge.
>
> Isn't that really a discoverabili
I have a package, cqrlog, which is pascal based and the latest version
doesn't appear to do a debug build.
error: Empty %files file
/home/build/rpmbuild/cqrlog/BUILD/cqrlog-2.1.0/debugfiles.list
There is a debug target but it doesn't seem to work properly...
make -j4 debug
lazbuild --bm=debug -
I've had a similar problem before - the issue is that on 32-bit targets, fpc
defaults to generating debuginfo in stabs format (instead of DWARF) and that is
no longer supported by find-debuginfo.
You can read my thread here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On mercredi 2 août 2017 13:19:56 CEST David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname
> bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages:
>
> boomaga
> calligra
> cups-filters
> evas-generic-loaders
> gambas3
> gdal
> gdcm
> inkscape
On 09/11/2017 12:49 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On mercredi 2 août 2017 13:19:56 CEST David Tardon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname
>> bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages:
>>
>> boomaga
>> calligra
>> cups-filt
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 21/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 140147 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/
On 4 September 2017 at 11:45, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> I also don't think that nagging upstream about these missing icons is really
> welcome - most of the times even upstream doesn't have a graphic artist
> available.
I disagree here, sometimes nagging upstream is the best way to tell
them that
Gwyn Ciesla wrote:
>> I've had issues with texlive and gdal not installing on Rawhide because
>> of poppler:
>>
>>> DEBUG util.py:450:- nothing provides libpoppler.so.68()(64bit)
>>> needed by
>> texlive-pdftex-bin-6:svn40987-36.20160520.fc27.5.x86_64
>>> DEBUG util.py:450:- nothing provid
While cleaning up an old spec file, I came across a desktop file,
containing MimeType information, which is to be placed under
/usr/share/mimelnk. The same information also exists in a regular
desktop file (which goes in /usr/share/applications), so it doesn't
add anything.
Over at freedesktop.org
> @Jack, thank you for providing me with a cool list of stuff to remove, any
> other ideas how to make Fedora KDE a better experience? =)
No it's really good like that :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
No time for that ;)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Very good point. I think that the original poster meant "not needed" by him
> but
> it is good to be precise.
Not at all. I meant softs not popular / less common / not that useful / can be
replaced by better softs.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lis
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Is it safe to get rid of the file, or is there something like EPEL
> that might still be using it?
mimelnk was used in kde3, shouldn't be used by much of anything these days.
I can probably go away without any adverse affects.
-- Rex
__
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2017-09-12 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us o
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> mimelnk was used in kde3, shouldn't be used by much of anything these days.
> I can probably go away without any adverse affects.
Thank you Rex, I will report it upstream as well.
___
devel mailing l
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 43/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 140333 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/140333
ID: 140336 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-
Thank you very much again for helping out here: I would not have known how to
fix this. I am wondering if you think that it might be a good idea to ask
upstream to update using openssl v 1.1 (with the patch included). If this is
the future for openssl, then that might be a good move for them to
tis 2017-09-12 klockan 03:20 + skrev Globe Trotter:
> Thank you very much again for helping out here: I would not have
> known how to fix this. I am wondering if you think that it might be a
> good idea to ask upstream to update using openssl v 1.1 (with the
> patch included). If this is the fu
29 matches
Mail list logo
