In openssl 1.1 some functions were renamed to newer more consistent
names. There are however preprocessor macros defined for most of them
so that old code still compiles. One of the old functions that was
renamed was SSL_library_init, which now is defined in
/usr/include/openssl/ssl.h as
# define
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 06:39:29PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:25 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 5 September 2017 at 22:40, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Chris Murphy
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > FWIW, you can just download the F27 kern
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 42/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20170905.n.1):
ID: 139172 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_service_manipulation
URL: https://openqa.fedorapr
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 04:08:55PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname
> bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages:
Done. The status is as follows:
> boomaga
> cups-filters
> evas-generic-loaders
> gambas3
> gdc
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 13:45:42 +0200
David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 04:08:55PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes
> > soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages:
>
> Done. The status is as fol
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > It's easier on implementation. That's the main reason. I generally
> > believe that
> > what's easier on implementation is better.
>
> It's maybe easier on the copr side, but not for the copr users ...
>
> If you can modify the u
From devel@lists.fedoraproject.org:
FWIW, AFAICT the current state of this is that we had some F27
modular composes that 'succeeded' (the last being 20170831.n.0), but
none of them contained any images at all. Since 20170831.n.0, the
compose has failed each day, apparently due to
https:/
On 09/08/2017 02:40 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>> The currently implementation of the Bodhi CLI subclasses
>> fedora.client.OpenIdBaseClient, which does not support kerberos:
>>
>> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/blob/2.10.1/bodhi/client/bindin
>> gs.py#L105
>
> Is there a bug opened
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> From devel@lists.fedoraproject.org:
>
> FWIW, AFAICT the current state of this is that we had some F27
> modular composes that 'succeeded' (the last being 20170831.n.0), but
> none of them contained any images at all. Since 20170831.n.0
On 08/09/17 15:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
We're getting to crunch time, here. Should we:
a) scramble to get these things in place
b) postpone the change until F28 (Release Modular Server as another
Boltron?)
c) ask FESCo to d
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 08/09/17 15:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We're getting to crunch time, here. Should we:
>>>
>>>a) scramble to get these things in place
>>>b) postpone the change unti
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 08/09/17 15:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We're getting to crunch time, here. Should we:
>>>
>>>a) scramble to get these things in place
>>>b) postpone the change until
On 09/08/2017 10:51 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> Surely (c) would make a mockery of change system. What would not make a
> mockery of the change system would be to invoke the contingency plan.
>
> Except there doesn't seem to be one:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modular_Server#Contingenc
On 8 September 2017 at 16:04, Randy Barlow
wrote:
> On 09/08/2017 10:51 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > Surely (c) would make a mockery of change system. What would not make a
> > mockery of the change system would be to invoke the contingency plan.
> >
> > Except there doesn't seem to be one:
> >
> >
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 10:38 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> From devel@lists.fedoraproject.org:
For the record, I believe you meant to link to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474931
> FWIW, AFAICT the current state of this is that we had some F27
> modular composes that 'succeede
On 09/08/2017 11:14 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 8 September 2017 at 16:04, Randy Barlow
mailto:bowlofe...@fedoraproject.org>>
wrote:
On 09/08/2017 10:51 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> Surely (c) would make a mockery of change system. What would not
make a
> mockery of the change sy
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 08:56:29AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 10:38 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > From devel@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> For the record, I believe you meant to link to:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474931
Yes! Sorry, and thank you.
-
Thanks for the detailed explanation! I wonder if it would be better to get this
fixed upstream? If so, I will wait (and perhaps put in a patch using your
suggested example).
Thanks!
From: Mattias Ellert
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 2:31 AM
Subject
Here are links to the summary and minutes from today's FESCo meeting:
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-09-08/fesco.2017-09-08-16.00.txt
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-09-08/fesco.2017-09-08-16.00.log.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digita
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Kalev Lember wrote:
>
>> I
>> can add the triggers to KDE and other themes as well if their
>> maintainers are fine with it. rdieter?
>
> If you don't mind, please do, thanks.
Looking closer, I'm curious why you chose to go with:
%transfiletriggerin -- %{_datadir}/icons/hic
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 11:58 -0400, langdon wrote:
> From mattdm:
>
>Also note that the release blocking images list for F27 does not yet
>even exist, let alone has it been updated for this Change:
>
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/26/ReleaseBlocking (F26 page)
>https://f
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 41/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20170906.n.0):
ID: 138998 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fe
On 09/02/2017 03:09 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> As co-maintainer of 'hdf5', i worked since some days on upgrade of this
> package. It's currently on stable repositories with the release 1.8.12,
> new release will be the 1.10.1
> (https://support.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/docNewFeatures/).
Exc
I was playing around in the new Pagure https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and I
created a fork of a repo to test. However, I don't need or want this fork.
How do I delete it? There doesn't appear to be an option.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapr
Hi,
Thank you for your detailed response. However, I tried replacing
AC_CHECK_LIB(ssl, SSL_library_init, ssl_ok=yes, ssl_ok=no, -lcrypto)
with
AC_CHECK_LIB(ssl, SSL_writet, ssl_ok=yes, ssl_ok=no, -lcrypto)
but I get the following error later on in the compilation:
https.c: In function 'handle_cer
25 matches
Mail list logo
