ocaml-gsl (OCaml bindings for GNU Scientific Library) currently
fails to link to atlas:
+ /usr/bin/ocamlfind ocamlopt -g -I lib -linkpkg -package bigarray -I lib -I
examples lib/gsl.cmxa examples/blas_ex.cmx -o examples/blas_ex.native
/usr/lib64/atlas/libsatlas.so: undefined reference to `dlarfy
On 08/09/2017 11:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> ocaml-gsl (OCaml bindings for GNU Scientific Library) currently
> fails to link to atlas:
>
> + /usr/bin/ocamlfind ocamlopt -g -I lib -linkpkg -package bigarray -I lib -I
> examples lib/gsl.cmxa examples/blas_ex.cmx -o examples/blas_ex.native
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:45:46PM -0400, djb djb wrote:
> Hello and thank you.
>
> What is the best direction to get started with doing reviews and or helping
> out triaging/fixing bugs.
There's a long list of reviews waiting on
https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html
The best wa
Hi
mingw-qt5-qtbase and mingw-qt5-qttools are currently FTBFS [1] due to
errors like
error: Could not open %files file
/builddir/build/BUILD/qtbase-opensource-src-5.9.1/debugsourcefiles.list: No
such file or directory
Duplicate build-ids
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.9.1-
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> ocaml-gsl (OCaml bindings for GNU Scientific Library) currently
> fails to link to atlas:
>
> + /usr/bin/ocamlfind ocamlopt -g -I lib -linkpkg -package bigarray -I lib -I
> examples lib/gsl.cmxa examples/blas_ex.cmx -o examples/blas_ex
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:10:02PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 08/09/2017 11:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > ocaml-gsl (OCaml bindings for GNU Scientific Library) currently
> > fails to link to atlas:
> >
> > + /usr/bin/ocamlfind ocamlopt -g -I lib -linkpkg -package bigarray -I lib
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hello Fedora Python package maintainers!
>
> This is an announcement of a mass package renaming:
> Python 2 binary packages will be renamed to python2-*.
> List 1. for those packages which will be taken care of by the mass remaining
>P
Hello,
while working on another thing, I noticed that when use_bootstrap_container
project option was introduced (Wed Jun 14 this year), it was introduced as
enabled for existing COPR projects at that time. That was not exactly
intended as this feature is experimental.
Enabling this option makes
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:14:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hello Fedora Python package maintainers!
>
> This is an announcement of a mass package renaming:
> Python 2 binary packages will be renamed to python2-*.
>
> This will happen soon after the F27 branching on August 15th
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 11:04:06AM -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2017, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > Hello Fedora Python package maintainers!
> >
> > This is an announcement of a mass package renaming:
> > Python 2 binary packages will be renamed to python2-*.
>
> > List 1
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:48:42PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:14:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Hello Fedora Python package maintainers!
> >
> > This is an announcement of a mass package renaming:
> > Python 2 binary packages will be renamed t
Hi Sandro,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Long text short question: can someone help me adapt this logic for the
> new debuginfo/debugsource mechanism?
rpm was changed to make exactly these kind of scenarious easier to handle.
And at the same time it enabled some s
A workaround that probably gets you past the build failure for now is to
just revert rpm to its old logic by adding the following to your spec
file:
%undefine _debugsource_packages
%undefine _debuginfo_subpackages
Thanks, that worked for now.
[2]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-qt5
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:08:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:48:42PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:14:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > Hello Fedora Python package maintainers!
> > >
> > > This is an
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 23:45 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:24:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Is there any chance of running that at, say,
> > > https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs-nextrelease/ instead of a
> > > local instance?
> >
> > I mean, in *theory*
On 08/09/2017 04:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:08:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:48:42PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:14:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hello Fedora
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 17:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks!
So there was some great feedback on the first version of this proposal;
here's the second draft, with all the suggestions considered and
applied. Note, given the misunderstanding between Kamil and Matt, I
added a little parag
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:41:34PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> To be clear, if this isn't just an idle thought but a specific request
> that "yes, blockerbugs-nextrelease would be an extremely useful thing
> for me, please do it", we probably *can* do that. If that's the case,
> please file a t
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hello Fedora Python package maintainers!
This is an announcement of a mass package renaming:
Python 2 binary packages will be renamed to python2-*.
This will happen soon after the F27 branching on August 15th.
Currently ~1330 source pack
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 07:13:21PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >>>The Provides satisfies any dependancies on the old name, but you're
> >>>missing an Obsoletes to tell RPM the upgrade path. Trying to installing
> >>>the new python2-libvirt RPM on an existing system fails because it
> >>>clashes
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:52:19PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Where did your list of 'all python packages' come from? I fear that
> there are some missing because wxPython should be in there.
>
> I'll plan on fixing wxPython myself, but you may want to look into
> why it wasn't on the list as
Hi,
let me remind you we have Voting period of the currently running
Fedora Elections in progress.
Please vote for your candidates to Council [1], FAmSCo [2] and FESCo [3].
The Voting period ends on August 14th, 2017 at 23:59:59 UTC.
You might also check an article, summarizing interviews with no
22 matches
Mail list logo
