Dne 3.8.2017 v 15:24 Richard Hughes napsal(a):
> On 3 August 2017 at 14:07, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Well, the thing is you are looking at old data as far as I can tell,
>> since this was fixed in the package several days ago [1].
> The metadata builder got stuck, and I was at GUADEC for the last f
Hello folks!
I did some builds on Rawhide / fc27 yesterday and they are still stuck
in f27-pending. Is the signing queue blocked again?
Cheers,
Björn
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le.
On 2017-08-03, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb
>
What is the Pagure over dist-git URL? The linked document has everywhere
placeholder links with src.fedoraproject.org domain and if I try any
of them it returns "Not Found" page. And t
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:36:32AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2017-08-03, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb
> >
> What is the Pagure over dist-git URL? The linked document has everywhere
> placeholder links with src.fedoraproject
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I did some builds on Rawhide / fc27 yesterday and they are still stuck in
> f27-pending. Is the signing queue blocked again?
There's probably a backlog due to mass rebuild part two being processed
__
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:36:32AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>> On 2017-08-03, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> >
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb
>> >
>> What is the Pagure over dist-git URL? The linked
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:55:54AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > It is not yet deployed in production (I'm working on this today) so it is
> > not
> > yet available :)
> Is it actually being deployed today? In the middle of the mass rebuild?
Yeah; not ideal, but it was coordinated so Pierre's
Do a stable release do Fedora 25.1 or 26.1
install a live disk and have 2 bg of updates is a joke,
you may take double of the time but do something that we can call it
stable .
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
There are updated ISOs available:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/
Not for Fedora 26 yet, but I guess they´ll be available soon.
2017-08-04 12:23 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto :
> Do a stable release do Fedora 25.1 or 26.1
>
> install a live disk and have 2 bg of updates is a joke,
> y
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:18:09PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> What next
> -
>
> We're going to experiment with this!
My humble plan is to create a very early PoC Atomic Host module
that people could try out within the next two weeks. This will
reveal the weak spots in the pipeline
On 08/04/2017 06:04 AM, František Zatloukal wrote:
There are updated ISOs available:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/
Not for Fedora 26 yet, but I guess they´ll be available soon.
It's also very easy to create an updated ISO yourself.
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:23:30AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Do a stable release do Fedora 25.1 or 26.1
>
> install a live disk and have 2 bg of updates is a joke,
> you may take double of the time but do something that we can call it
> stable .
Making a stable release like this would imply
Hi all.
I'm going to abandon 'libpwiz' package on f27.
Feel free to claim ownership if you need it.
Regards.
--
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.
<>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing
Dear All,
I'm orphaning the package makedepf90. I originally packaged it only
to be able to unbundle it from cp2k, where it was used during the
build process, but it hasn't been used since release 2.6.0, when
upstream switched to their own dependency generation script written
in python. If anyone w
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
> o
The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/7.4_Release_Notes/chap-Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-7.4_Release_Notes-Deprecated_Functionality.html
Btrfs has been deprecated
The Btrfs file syst
I noticed this FESCo topic:
#link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unified_database_for_DNF
proposing a unified sqlite database for DNF. Recently there's been a
discussion of replacing the RPM database with a custom database layer,
where people asked why aren't we using something like sql
On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
Is it only RHEL?
What are other distros doing?
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/7.4_Release_Notes/chap-Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linu
On 04/08/17 16:23, Fernando Nasser wrote:
On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
Is it only RHEL?
Yes, it is only RHEL. It does not have any effect on Fedora, that is
entirely independent,
Steve.
___
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:12:46AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> This is a pity---BTRFS features looked attractive:
Regardless of the attractiveness of btr's feature sets, the RH
annoucnement is an indication that they don't consider it supportable
for the kinds of users that fork over money
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/7.4_Release_Notes/chap-Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-7.4_Release_Notes-Deprecated_Functiona
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/7.4_Release_Notes/chap-Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-7.4_Release_Notes-Deprecated_Functiona
Some insight why was BTRFS dropped by RH:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14907771
Also check out Stratis:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StratisStorage
2017-08-04 17:12 GMT+02:00 Przemek Klosowski :
> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
>
> https:/
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>
> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
>
>
> Is it only RHEL?
>
> What are other distros doing?
>
It is only RHEL, but unfortunately that has a *huge* knoc
On 4 August 2017 at 08:54, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Heh .. things always happens in the wrong time ;) Checking g-s with the
> appstream-data-27-4.fc27, I can see "Amazon Cloud Player" listed under
> Nuvola, so this looks promising.
Good stuff.
> BTW could you please take a look at "eu.tiliado.Nuvola
On 04/08/17 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>> On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>>
>> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
>>
>>
>> Is it only RHEL?
>>
>> What are other distros doing?
>>
>
> It is
On 4 August 2017 at 16:46, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> ...it fails the most basic requirement of a filesystem -- to not
> eat data.
Me also; I've tried btfs three times now -- in one case telling me I
had no free space after a few weeks when clearly there was tens GBs
free, one time needing to wipe a
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 4 August 2017 at 16:46, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > ...it fails the most basic requirement of a filesystem -- to not
> > eat data.
>
> Me also; I've tried btfs three times now -- in one case telling me I
> had no free space after a few we
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:43:51PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 04/08/17 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> >> On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> >>
> >> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> I'm not particularly pleased with their decision. I think the path
> they're going down is wrong, and they should really reconsider.
> However, I'm reading over their Stratis whitepaper before I formulate
> a response about it.
>
> I don't thi
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:43:51PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> On 04/08/17 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The
On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname
> bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages:
>
> boomaga
> calligra
> cups-filters
> evas-generic-loaders
> gambas3
> gdal
> gdcm
> inkscape
> k
32 matches
Mail list logo
