Fedora Rawhide-20170722.n.0 compose check report

2017-07-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 20/137 (x86_64), 4/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 123216 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/123216 ID: 123218 Test: x86

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2017-07-24 Fedora QA Meeting

2017-07-23 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. We met the last couple of weeks, and I think a lot of us are still catching up on tasks from those meetings (at least I am). If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahea

Re: Approved packages that never get imported?

2017-07-23 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 18:06:58 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > MS> The ticket blocks FE-NEEDSPONSOR. No idea why you've approved the > MS> review officially, setting the fedora-review+ flag without being > MS> able to sponsor the new contributor. > > Because that is perfectly acceptable. It

Re: Approved packages that never get imported?

2017-07-23 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "MS" == Michael Schwendt writes: MS> setting fedora-review+ hides the ticket from the needsponsor tracker MS> queue. You've deleted that part when quoting me. Why? Because it's not relevant to the point I was making. - J< ___ devel mailing list

Re: dnf cache downloading behavior

2017-07-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:42:11PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:25:48AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> > Here you aren't root so it's not using the same cache, because it can't > >> > write to the root owned c

Fedora Rawhide-20170723.n.0 compose check report

2017-07-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 18/137 (x86_64), 3/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170721.n.1): ID: 123386 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fed

Live image booting issue with locally built anaconda

2017-07-23 Thread Kalpa Welivitigoda
Hi, I am trying to build a live image (with livecd-creator) based on Fedora 26. In doing so I patch a couple of packages (I maintain them in a local rpm repository) including anaconda. However with the iso built with the patched anaconda rpm, I don't see the GUI in booting. The screen goes blank a

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2017-07-23 Thread nobody
Change in package status over the last 168 hours 0 packages were orphaned 7 packages were retired calligra-l10n [master, f26] was retired by rdieter Language files for calligra https://adm

giflib or libgif is 5 years old

2017-07-23 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hello, Since 2012-06-20 giflib-5.0.0 is available [1] but rawhide still have version 4.1.6-17.fc27 , can we update it ? I usually could ask for ACLs but ENOTIME ... Thanks, [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822844 -- Sérgio M. B. __

Re: Approved packages that never get imported?

2017-07-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 18:06:58 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> Because that is perfectly acceptable. It is not required for a sponsor >> to do a package review for a person who is not a packager. That must be a recent policy change. (It used to be required.) > setti