On 14.07.2017 19:36, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:27 PM Matthew Miller 05:05:23PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>
>>
>>> How about reliable online updates of running applications as a
>>> benefit?
>>
>> AND the ability to roll back, to choose beta or stable streams, etc.
>>
>
>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:55:52AM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 00:36 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Koji will take care of the signing for Flatpaks
> > built in Koji as it does for RPMs built in Koji.
So there is change really.
Before: developers sign tarball, packagers aut
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:42:15PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 00:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > > = System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks =
> > > > https
On 15 July 2017 at 12:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:55:52AM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 00:36 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > Koji will take care of the signing for Flatpaks
>> > built in Koji as it does for RPMs built in Koji.
>
> So t
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:56:34PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> This is only a problem because Flatpak is currently following the IMO
> rather busted old Android model. With very few, if any, exceptions, I
> think a much better model would be for an application to start with
> basically no per
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
