Re: cbang build error on epel

2017-07-08 Thread Samuel Rakitničan
> Argument 4 is the "n". Right, if I adapt the fix for 4th argument, that works. > The problem is with the definition of "PRIo64. There was a recent commit > attempting to fix that, but it probably needs some adjustment to handle your > case. Check out the lines around line 48 in that file and

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Bundled Provides Libraries and Versioning

2017-07-08 Thread Björn Persson
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Alternatively, say that you don't have to specify a version, but if > you don't then you will get every related security bug filed against > your package instead of having those filtered by version. Perhaps with a notice included in each such bug report, along the lin

Re: Bundled Provides Libraries and Versioning

2017-07-08 Thread Björn Persson
Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Another problem is selecting the name for the provides. E.g. pick > between bundled(ANGLE) or bundled(libangle). With the next evince > update, evince will bundle a LZMA decoder. Should it be bundled(LZMA) > or bundled(lzma-sdk) or bundled(7zip)? Some of these options

Re: F27 Self Contained Change: VirtualBox Guest Integration

2017-07-08 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 07-07-17 16:43, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 08:14 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: We want to make the default installation do the right thing, as far as possible, on any system, without any explicit confi

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Bundled Provides Libraries and Versioning

2017-07-08 Thread Ville Skyttä
7.7.2017 20.45 "Jason L Tibbitts III" kirjoitti: I would argue that it doesn't remove the ability, but that it does make it more difficult to do in an automated fashion. Basically you can see that something has a bundled library but then you need to do manual inspection to go further. I think

fedora-review fails checks

2017-07-08 Thread Antonio Trande
Hi all. Has anyone ever obtained in a 'fedora-review' error like that reported in bz ticket #1467048? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467048 07-02 11:20 root DEBUGBuild command: "mock" "-r" "fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free" "--no-cleanup-after" "--no-clean" "--result

Fedora Rawhide-20170708.n.0 compose check report

2017-07-08 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 24/137 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170707.n.2): ID: 118743 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso ins

[HEADS UP] libgit2 0.26.x is coming into Rawhide

2017-07-08 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I'll be updating libgit2 stack to 0.26.x this weekend, there is only one breaking change and looks like none from packages are affected. - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAllhBxQACgkQaVc

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

2017-07-08 Thread Samuel Rakitničan
IMHO, based on first impressions, new features aside. I don't like the interface responsiveness. If I compare it with cgit, cgit is reasonably fast with an nice overview. Browsing pages with packages with pagure is slower, browsing users pages is unusable, it literally takes minutes to load a p

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

2017-07-08 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 05:39:49PM -, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > IMHO, based on first impressions, new features aside. I don't like the > interface responsiveness. > > If I compare it with cgit, cgit is reasonably fast with an nice overview. > Browsing pages with packages with pagure is slow

Re: Issues with Recovery and Documentation

2017-07-08 Thread stan
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 14:45:38 -0700 "Gerald B. Cox" wrote: > Your onto something...I tried renaming the file on both the rescue > image and then on the target system, and it didn't help.. > I did find when running the strace it returned with a bunch of no > such file or directory as above and also:

Re: Issues with Recovery and Documentation

2017-07-08 Thread Gerald B. Cox
Thanks for taking the time to respond. Yes, I got the same type of errors you received, in addition to the: > "bin/bash"open("/usr/share/locale/en_US.UTF-8/LC_ MESSAGES/libc.mo",O_RDONLY) I listed previously. It appears there is something quirky going on with locale, and apparently this has been

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-07-09)

2017-07-08 Thread till
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Orphaned Packages in branched (2017-07-09)

2017-07-08 Thread till
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y