On 3 July 2017 at 02:04, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 1 July 2017 at 21:42, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On 1 July 2017 at 03:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 12:07 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Even if a 4.0 does happen, the magnitude of the change relative to the
prece
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 04:07:43PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Each such "collection" module MUST have one or both of the following:
>
> * A "latest" rolling stream (As above, this would be separate from
> "rawhide", as "latest stable", but could update frequently and
> arbitrarily
Il giorno lun, 03/07/2017 alle 09.29 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy ha
scritto:
> > When the firs (beta) F27 + samba 4.7 AD will be release, I will try
> > the upgrade on a test virtual environment.
>
> Sure!
Thanks!
I'll let you know
--
Dario Lesca
(inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 25 Workstation)
_
Flock funding decisions will begin being released this week. Please do
not ask, irc, email, telegram, smoke signal, etc. anyone about the
status of your decision or about when decisions will be released.
Everytime someone interrupts the funding committee (or me when I am
processing the requests)
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017, at 10:34 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:29:29PM +0200, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
> > However, considering this from a different angle, a LAMP stack module,
> > for example, might just need to make a certain API/ABI promise and then
> > it could roll for
Hello everybody!
Since MariaDB 10.2 is finally stable and I resolved all issues that blocked
it for Fedora, I'd like to propose an update for Rawhide.
Current version of MariaDB: 10.1.24
Update planned to: 10.2.6 (or newer)
*This change introduces change of library name from "libmysqlclient.so"
On 07/03/2017 03:12 PM, Michal Schorm wrote:
Hello everybody!
Since MariaDB 10.2 is finally stable and I resolved all issues that
blocked it for Fedora, I'd like to propose an update for Rawhide.
Current version of MariaDB: 10.1.24
Update planned to: 10.2.6 (or newer)
*This change introduces
Nope.
MariaDB is a drop-in replacement. In version 5.5.
For quite a time we use MariaDB 10.1, which openly declared "Now we know
what we are doing and now we know where do we want to go".
MariaDB 10.2 just take another step forward in technology and away from
MySQL.
--
Michal Schorm
Associate S
Hi all,
Recently I want to continue the package review request of cvechecker[1]
with mine since it has been quiet for a long time.
So I did commented in comment 7 this March. However, there is no update
till now. I dropped an email to packaging list[2] just now and Tomas
suggest me to ask for a r
On 07/03/2017 04:02 PM, Michal Schorm wrote:
Nope.
MariaDB is a drop-in replacement. In version 5.5.
What you wrote is an API change
=> MariaDB is not a drop-in replacement for MySQL anymore.
The "many ṕackages requiring changes" you mentioned furtherly manifest this.
Ralf
__
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 09:05:23AM +, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
Hi Fabio,
>
> I need somebody to take on the Review Requests of the only 3 golang
> dependencies that are still blocking a syncthing package:
>
> golang-github-cznic-zappy:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 15:52 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/03/2017 03:12 PM, Michal Schorm wrote:
> > Hello everybody!
> >
> > Since MariaDB 10.2 is finally stable and I resolved all issues
> > that
> > blocked it for Fedora, I'd like to propose an update for Rawhide.
> >
> > Current versi
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:11:33PM +0800, Zamir SUN wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently I want to continue the package review request of cvechecker[1]
> with mine since it has been quiet for a long time.
>
> So I did commented in comment 7 this March. However, there is no update
> till now. I dropped a
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 24/128 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 116644 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/116644
ID: 116645 Test: x86_64
Hi,
I have a handful of packages in the review queue that I'd be willing
to exchange reviews for. I'm happy to exchange for reviews of
similarly sized packages, or several for a more complicated review.
Two miscellaneous packages (C/C++):
qotd - A simple and lightweight Quote of the Day daemon:
Hi Ben
I'm happy to take the first two in exchange for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461368
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465676
which are simple C/C++ MinGW packages. Deal?
Thanks
Sandro
On 03.07.2017 19:58, Ben Rosser wrote:
Hi,
I have a handful of packages
I've just submitted a change proposal for creating Flatpaks out of Fedora
package content:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Graphical_Applications_as_Flatpaks
This is submitted as a F27 change proposal, but it's expected that it will be
multiple releases before everything in the final
The prototype flatpak-runtime module that I’ve been working on is built upon
the (F26) base-runtime and shared-userspace modules, and I’ve hit some
conceptual questions about the nature of the “modulemd” requires relationship.
* Is a module tied to the exact version of the modules it requires t
Oh, nice. In this case I'll take everything back…
I just got the impression, because of the prices list on the main website
(https://askbot.com/plans/) and on askbot.com I did not find a link to the repo…
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
Aha, so the discussion is about the "(not so) free" level packs already. Did
not know that, indeed. If so, everything is all right. And in any case, you can
still package it without these level packs. :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje
Ah, thanks. Indeed. It's a bit old, but nice… :) Thanks for packaging it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi Ben
>
> I'm happy to take the first two in exchange for
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461368
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465676
>
> which are simple C/C++ MinGW packages. Deal?
>
> Thanks
> Sandro
Taken
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2017-07-04 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us o
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
24 matches
Mail list logo
