To make this easy, I dug out an old script I had and cleaned it up.
It's 'find-package-maintainers' and is available from
https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities
Just feed it a list of source package names (on stdin or in a named
file) and it will extract the owner lists from pkgdb for
- Original Message -
> From: "Tony Breeds"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 2:03:44 AM
> Subject: Re: F27 System Wide Change: Golang 1.9
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:06:17AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
>
>
>
> > Along with the rebase I do propose to
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:17:33 -0400 (EDT)
Jakub Cajka wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Tony Breeds"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 2:03:44 AM
> > Subject: Re: F27 System Wide Change: Golang 1.9
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 22:08 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to find a way to bootstrap a Fedora rootfs from x86_64 for
> aarch64 (similar to debootstrap with "debootstrap --arch arm64
> "), but I can't seem to find any.
we got debootstrap in Fedora :) [1]
may you test it ? an
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 13:17, Jakub Cajka wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Tony Breeds"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 2:03:44 AM
> > Subject: Re: F27 System Wide Change: Golang 1.9
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:06:17AM +0200, Ja
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 22:08 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I'm trying to find a way to bootstrap a Fedora rootfs from x86_64 for
>> aarch64 (similar to debootstrap with "debootstrap --arch arm64
>> "), but I can't seem to find any
On 06/22/2017 0013Z, Neal Gompa wrote:
Yes, we do have debootstrap, but it can only build Debian-based systems. :)
I want to be able to build a Fedora based one.
Please be specific, and give a concrete example of what should change.
debootstrap takes a list of .debs and builds a root filesyst
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:29 AM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 06/22/2017 0013Z, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> Yes, we do have debootstrap, but it can only build Debian-based systems.
>> :)
>>
>> I want to be able to build a Fedora based one.
>
>
> Please be specific, and give a concrete example of what shoul
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:33:25 -0400
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:29 AM, John Reiser
> wrote:
> > On 06/22/2017 0013Z, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, we do have debootstrap, but it can only build Debian-based
> >> systems. :)
> >>
> >> I want to be able to build a Fedora based o
> "IS" == Iryna Shcherbina writes:
IS> Thanks a lot, that is helpful. There is also a pkgdb2client [0]
IS> package that I've been looking into for this.
You could run that tool in a loop, parse the result and generate the
report, I guess, but it's also rather trivial to just make the necessa
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:29 AM, John Reiser wrote:
>> On 06/22/2017 0013Z, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, we do have debootstrap, but it can only build Debian-based systems.
>>> :)
>>>
>>> I want to be able to build a Fedora based one.
>>
>>
>
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:29 AM, John Reiser wrote:
>>> On 06/22/2017 0013Z, Neal Gompa wrote:
Yes, we do have debootstrap, but it can only build Debian-based systems.
:)
>>>
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to find a way to bootstrap a Fedora rootfs from x86_64 for
> aarch64 (similar to debootstrap with "debootstrap --arch arm64
> "), but I can't seem to find any.
>
> I recall that we added qemu-user-static back in Fedora 2
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:29 AM, John Reiser wrote:
On 06/22/2017 0013Z, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Yes, we do have debootstr
I know that a lot of us in the Fedora world are from traditional IT
backgrounds. From this point of view, can containers seem like just the
latest buzzword in a long series of fads, and not really all that
different from virtualization or various system-partitioning schemes of
days past.
This is a
While playing with Base Runtime container base images we noticed
that some packages couldn't be installed with coreutils-single
due to their /bin file dependencies. Unlike the original
coreutils package, coreutils-single doesn't provide the
pre-UsrMove paths.
Now there are at least two ways to re
Hey,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 07:42:27AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = System Wide Change: Kerberos KCM credential cache by default =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KerberosKCMCache
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Jakub Hrozek
>
> Default to a new Kerberos credential cache type called KCM which
Hello,
I have been facing an issue with lightdm-gtk since I installed Fedora 25 (mate
desktop) in my system.
When I boot system and try login for the first time, lightdm-gtk segfaults and
screen goes blacks for a second or so. Then lightdm-gtk re-appears asking for
login credentials again. The s
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:27:47PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 20 June 2017 at 12:44, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On 20 June 2017 at 02:49, Przemek Klosowski
> > wrote:
> >> It seems to me that there are two kinds of Python packages affected by
> >> this
> >> issue: some track the evolution of
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:55:50 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
> https://container-solutions.com/dynamic-management-real-ops-disruptor/
What strikes me about this is that containers sound like static linking
on steroids. This seems like it would create a lot of redundancy on a
standalone system. Whe
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:09:35PM -0700, stan wrote:
> > https://container-solutions.com/dynamic-management-real-ops-disruptor/
> What strikes me about this is that containers sound like static linking
> on steroids.
That's not entirely unfair. The important thing though is that these
particular
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Petr Šabata wrote:
> While playing with Base Runtime container base images we noticed
> that some packages couldn't be installed with coreutils-single
> due to their /bin file dependencies. Unlike the original
> coreutils package, coreutils-single doesn't provide
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:32:09 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
Thanks for your insight.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 23 June 2017 at 04:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> There are two downsides to this kind of declaration:
> - python2-runtimedep[12] will be used until the switch to python3 as
> default is made, which might be very long. Instead, we would prefer
> packages to use python3-runtimedep[
On 22 June 2017 at 12:54, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> 1. How to modify a package to explicitly declare it as "Python 2 only"
>> (and the need for a "BuildRequires: epel-rpm-macros" to reliably get
>> access to the versioned Python macros on EL syst
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170621.n.0):
ID: 111854 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/111854
ID: 111874 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz
26 matches
Mail list logo
