On 06/14/2017 05:05 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 06/13/2017 06:32 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a reason for delaying the update for mesa-17.1.2 to F26?
>>
>> We're getting buildroot failures for some F26 packages that depend on
>> mesa (llvm was updated).
>>
>> Thanks,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a reason for delaying the update for mesa-17.1.2 to F26?
>
> We're getting buildroot failures for some F26 packages that depend on mesa
> (llvm was updated).
The mesa update and the buildroot failures were unrelated
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 22:47 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > Greetings.
> > > > >
> > > > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed
> > > > > rawhide
> > > > > composes in a while (13 days as of today).
> > > > >
> > > > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and iss
IMO, the latest package should be always non-versioned one and versioned
should be only the compat packages.
E.g. the llvm package is always the latest, shipping llvm 4.0 ATM and
llvm3.9 should be compat package, shipping the previous version. Once
new version is released, lets say llvm 5.0, the n
On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:38:11 + (UTC), till fedoraproject org wrote:
> eflspot, dchen, sereinit 114 weeks ago
> audacious-plugins (maintained by: mschwendt, atkac, danfruehauf)
> audacious-plugins-jack-3.8.2-2.fc26.i686 requires libjack
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Server boot i386
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 78/102 (x86_64), 18/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170531.n.1):
ID: 107819 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:08:55AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 16:04 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:48:37AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:44:57AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > See https://bugzill
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:22:53PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> IMO, the latest package should be always non-versioned one and versioned
> should be only the compat packages.
> E.g. the llvm package is always the latest, shipping llvm 4.0 ATM and
> llvm3.9 should be compat package, shipping the prev
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:11:21AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide
> composes in a while (13 days as of today).
>
> This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now
> failing composes that don'
On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:26:33 PM CEST Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2017-06-13, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >> vim-syntastic praiskup 38
> >> weeks ago
> >
> > Please don't remove this set of vim-syntastic* packages, there's
> > nothing to do about this. Once we h
Hello everybody,
I would like to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process [1] for
Christopher Aillon [2]. A long time ago, he used to be part of the
Fedora and Red Hat desktop teams. He is no longer around. He left
software development and was last seen living off the grid in Hawaii
[3]. The
I'd be interested in gnuchess and xboard, should they be orphaned. I've
been doing a lot with gnuchess in later years.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I would like to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process [1] for
> Christopher Aillon [2]. A
On 06/13/2017 03:47 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> For actual artifacts such as cloud/disk/installer images I agree but
> at least pushing out individual packages so people can do "dnf
> upgrade" picks up issues such as dependency issues that also kill the
> compose and allows people to still test e
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 06/13/2017 03:47 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> For actual artifacts such as cloud/disk/installer images I agree but
>> at least pushing out individual packages so people can do "dnf
>> upgrade" picks up issues such as dependency issues tha
On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:36 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * Composes are really slow (likely related to storage slowness), if they
> were faster or could fail faster we could untag/fix/iterate more. Right
> now we are lucky to get 2 chances a day.
When you're mentioning storage slowness, are we talk
On 06/14/2017 04:16 AM, Martin Kolman wrote:
> I agree with that - for example the Anaconda installer CI broke due to
> a rawhide package change in the last "working" compose. There is a
> fixed package available and built in Koji, but it's not reaching the
> Rawhide repos due to the broken compos
On 06/14/2017 10:00 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:36 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> * Composes are really slow (likely related to storage slowness), if they
>> were faster or could fail faster we could untag/fix/iterate more. Right
>> now we are lucky to get 2 chances a day.
>
On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 14:58 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:11:21AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed
> > rawhide
> > composes in a while (13 days as of today).
> >
> > This has been due to
On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 16:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Yes, I'm well aware of the plans but it doesn't help us now. There was
> over 3500 package updates in the compose, it shows how quickly we got
> behind.
FWIW I really see this as a resource/priority problem, not a process
problem. We ju
There are plenty of bugs [0] reported by users, who break their
systems using sudo pip and new bugs appear very often.
For example the bug [1] was opened a week ago. The biggest
issue is that in the current state it is not easy or even possible
to recover from such situations.
This issue is well
> "MM" == Matthew Miller writes:
MM> All other things aside, this is pragmatically easier, because
MM> creating a new package4 or package5 triggers a new package review.
That's not actually the case, though:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
"Note that some new packages
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:05:38PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> MM> All other things aside, this is pragmatically easier, because
> MM> creating a new package4 or package5 triggers a new package review.
> That's not actually the case, though:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_
> "MM" == Matthew Miller writes:
MM> Thanks for the correction!
Sure. It seems a lot of people miss this, though I tried to announce it
loudly back when it changed (in August). I've been trying to cut down
on the bureaucracy, and a package that needs to add a
parallel-installable version i
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:58:32PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Sure. It seems a lot of people miss this, though I tried to announce it
> loudly back when it changed (in August). I've been trying to cut down
> on the bureaucracy, and a package that needs to add a
> parallel-installable ve
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:20:25PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:26:33 PM CEST Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On 2017-06-13, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >> vim-syntastic praiskup 38
> > >> weeks ago
> > >
> > > Please don't remove this set o
Hi everyone,
Our hotel discount code for Flock went live yesterday. It is... *drumroll*
"FLOCK".
Here are the rates:
- A $139/night* rate per double, queen, or king room is available from August
27 to August 31. You will need to use the "Group Attendee" code "FLOCK" on the
hotel reservatio
Hi,
I've been looking into how to suggest packages for inclusion in Fedora
for some time. See
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/106042/where-do-i-request-new-packages-to-be-added-to-the-fedora-repos/.
Finally I'm giving a list of some very useful pieces of software I am
partially miss
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 01:22 +0200, rugk wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been looking into how to suggest packages for inclusion in Fedora
> for some time. See
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/106042/where-do-i-request-new-packages-to-be-added-to-the-fedora-repos/.
>
> Finally I'm giving a list of
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 5/102 (x86_64), 2/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170611.n.1):
ID: 108234 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://
On 06/14/2017 04:06 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
the
buildroot issues are now fixed, but I built mesa before the llvm-4
were stable in F-26 (about the time stuff unfroze) but I need to pull
a couple of patches in for RPi stability, I'll do that today and push
an update.
Thanks.
I've created a bui
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2017-06-15 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2017-06-15 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2017-06-15 1
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora Registry.
Base Images:
On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 11:38:38 PM CEST Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:20:25PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:26:33 PM CEST Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > On 2017-06-13, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > >> vim-syntastic praiskup
33 matches
Mail list logo
