[Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 06:57 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: > https://fedoraproject.or

Re: Orphan: mupdf/jbig2dec

On 05/31/2017 08:32 AM, Rémi Verschelde wrote: > 2017-05-31 8:24 GMT+02:00 Zdenek Dohnal : >> On 05/30/2017 01:19 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: >>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Pavel Zhukov >>> wrote: Hello. Due to many CVEs and low quality/security of these packages as well as

Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

As I'm its maintainer I also want to point out that Beta-1.3 is also missing the x86_64 build of the Astronomy Lab, there was some random (?) mirror issue, the Lab is not broken. Snipped from anaconda-packaging.log: 03:44:25,447 WARN packaging: Failed to download 'python3-xlrd-0.9.4-5.fc26.noarch

Orphaning rubygem-configuration

Hi all, I have orphaned rubygem-configuration in F26+. This package was previously required by rubygem-launchy, but it is not needed anymore. Therefore I orphaned F26+, but keep the F2{4,5} till their EOL. Feel free to pick the package if you have any use for it or let it be garbage collected, si

Re: retiring git-annex

I created a git-annex copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/git-annex/ ​ Jens ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Rsyslog log format change proposal

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:37:02PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 07:21:07PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > > Does this qualify to be a system-wide change? To me this looks like a > > self-contained change, since I don't see any other packages or processes in > > need

Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:46:10AM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > So I'd strongly prefer a 1.4 build as a random failure @build > infrastructure (which is not the maintainers fault), should not block > any build to be part of a (alpha/beta/final) release. I think ultimately we need a way to get

Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

On 05/31/2017 02:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:46:10AM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: So I'd strongly prefer a 1.4 build as a random failure @build infrastructure (which is not the maintainers fault), should not block any build to be part of a (alpha/beta/final) release

Retired mod_auth_kerb in Fedora master

Hi, I've retired mod_auth_kerb in the master branch. mod_auth_kerb has been unmaintained for many years. mod_auth_gssapi is now available and is an up-to-date, maintained replacement. Koji is the only dependency, let me or Simo know if you want help adjusting the koji-web configuration. Reg

F27 Self Contained Change: Making sudo pip Safe (Again)

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Making sudo pip Safe (Again) = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Making_sudo_pip_safe Change owner(s): * Michal Cyprian * Petr Viktorin * Tomas Orsava * Miro Hroncok At the present time, running sudo pip3 in Fedora is not safe. Pip shares its installati

Re: F27 Self Contained Change: Making sudo pip Safe (Again)

Am 31.05.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Jan Kurik: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Making sudo pip Safe (Again) = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Making_sudo_pip_safe Change owner(s): * Michal Cyprian * Petr Viktorin * Tomas Orsava * Miro Hroncok At the present time, running sudo pip3 in F

Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 10:46 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > As I'm its maintainer I also want to point out that Beta-1.3 is also > missing the x86_64 build of the Astronomy Lab, there was some random (?) > mirror issue, the Lab is not broken. > > Snipped from anaconda-packaging.log: > > 03:44:25

Orphaning rubygem-ruby-ole

Hi all, I don't have any use for rubygem-ruby-ole, so I orphaned the package. Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Rsyslog log format change proposal

> "TT" == Tomasz Torcz writes: TT> fail2ban works with journal. BTW, sshguard (which is similar to TT> fail2ban) works woth journal, too. Denyhosts doesn't use the journal, though I have a branch which does. Sadly I never could figure out why iterating over a journal.Reader() object will so

Re: Retired mod_auth_kerb in Fedora master

Thanks for the prod. I've filed an issue and PR with Koji upstream. Feel free to comment there https://pagure.io/koji/issue/443 https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/444 Granted, Fedora has their own spec for koji, so that will need to change as well. cc:Dennis On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:19 AM, J

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-06-01 16:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2017-06-01 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2017-06-01 09:00 PDT  US/Pacific 2017-06-01 1

not all that qualified...

Hello all, I have a fairly large package that needs review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415612 and I've been offered a few review swaps for it, but the trouble is, I don't really feel well qualified to review packages yet. I only maintain one other package (a pre-requisite fo

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Rsyslog log format change proposal

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:15:21PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "TT" == Tomasz Torcz writes: > > TT> fail2ban works with journal. BTW, sshguard (which is similar to > TT> fail2ban) works woth journal, too. > > Denyhosts doesn't use the journal, though I have a branch which does. >

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Rsyslog log format change proposal

> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: ZJ> I you post the code somewhere, I could have a look. It's in the upstream "journal" branch of the denyhosts source: https://github.com/denyhosts/denyhosts/tree/journal https://github.com/denyhosts/denyhosts/commit/d0d66a2890d50a460ecd20ee0b1

Re: not all that qualified...

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM David Muse wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a fairly large package that needs review: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415612 > > and I've been offered a few review swaps for it, but the trouble is, I > don't really feel well qualified to review package

[Bug 1457584] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170531 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457584 Bug ID: 1457584 Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170531 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Module-CoreList Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assi

Re: not all that qualified...

On 05/31/2017 05:19 PM, Christopher wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM David Muse > wrote: Hello all, I have a fairly large package that needs review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415612 and I've been offered a few review sw

Re: not all that qualified...

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:04 PM Susi Lehtola wrote: > On 05/31/2017 05:19 PM, Christopher wrote: > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM David Muse > > wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I have a fairly large package that needs review: > > https://bugzill

Re: not all that qualified...

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Christopher wrote: > Do you have a link to an explanation of the automated fedora-review process, > and/or some of these step-by-step checklists you mention? Plenty of links to follow in there: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process And this is the

Re: not all that qualified...

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:36 PM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Christopher > wrote: > > Do you have a link to an explanation of the automated fedora-review > process, and/or some of these step-by-step checklists you mention? > > Plenty

Re: not all that qualified...

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Christopher wrote: > I've looked at that wiki page before, and found it a bit of an information > overload. I don't think anyone would argue with that. > There's tons of information about the general process, but it's > not exactly an easy-to-follow step-by-step c

[Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.4 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the cu

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.4 Available Now!

On 06/01/2017 06:28 AM, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now available for testing. Trying Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-26_Beta-1.4.iso on an older i686-netbook fails with this: ... [Failed] Failed to start Switch Root See 'sys

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.4 Available Now!

What is "an older i686-netbook"? On 06/01/2017 08:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 06/01/2017 06:28 AM, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now available for testing. Trying Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-26_Beta-1.4.iso on an older