I believe that everyone comes from MS Windows to Linux will need to YAST,
currently it provides many modules that makes system management very easy:
* service management, what services are running, what are stopped, and user can
change their status.
* systemd control
* hardware configuration and
Hi,
unfortunately, we missed the deadline for F26 and we need to rework some
parts of the Change [0]. It is in progress at this moment. I believe,
we will make it for F27 and this issue will be finally fixed for all Fedora
users.
The Change is Python 3 specific for now. You can find related discus
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 10:42 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 12:57 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > Also, wasn't there an issue with the OpenSSL's licensing and
> > > > GPL?
> > > > If it still is, could it affect any of the packages that are
> > > > now using
> > > > li
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Adam Williamson
>>> It was tried for
>>> Fedora years ago, and discarded with a passion.
>>
>> What 'was tried for Fedora'? What are you referring to?
>
> Linuxconf, which was much like YaST. It was in s
El mié, 12-04-2017 a las 06:48 -0400, Neal Gompa escribió:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:43 AM, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Qui, 2017-04-06 at 14:20 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > > Isn't mash dead?
> > >
> > > Some people tell me it is, some other says no. And after some
> > > time,
> > > some
On 04/18/2017 12:17 AM, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
I believe that everyone comes from MS Windows to Linux will need to YAST,
currently it provides many modules that makes system management very easy:
* service management, what services are running, what are stopped, and user can
change their
El jue, 06-04-2017 a las 12:40 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones escribió:
> I have a package which needs GNU Privacy Guard (GPG) at runtime. It
> can either run gpg (v1) or gpg2, as it uses a subset of the features
> supported by both, and the program searches for both binaries.
>
> The natural way to e
JFYI, there's no soname bump, no ABI removed (only private symbols) - so no rush
is expected; I'm building the package into Rawhide right now:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19065513
Pavel
---
abipkgdiff:
$ abipkgdiff /tmp/result-old/libarchive-3.2.2-3.fc27.x86
Missing expected images:
Kde live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 17/97 (x86_64), 7/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170417.n.0):
ID: 82500 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/82500
I
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 21/110 (x86_64), 5/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170417.n.0):
ID: 82367 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/82367
ID: 82400 Test: x86_64 KDE-li
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 07:35 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a reminder that the webkitgtk and webkitgtk3 packages will be
> retired from rawhide shortly after F26 is branched from rawhide. This
> is due to numerous security issues affecting those packages (I just
> counted 204 CV
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 18:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It seems that nothing has been set to obsolete these packages. This
> is
> breaking upgrade from Fedora 24 to Fedora 27 (without --allow-
> erasing),
> since webkitgtk3 is installed by default in many Fedora 24 package
> sets, and is built
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 21:01 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 18:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It seems that nothing has been set to obsolete these packages. This
> > is
> > breaking upgrade from Fedora 24 to Fedora 27 (without --allow-
> > erasing),
> > since webkitgtk
13 matches
Mail list logo
