On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 11:15:28PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:47:35AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 5, 2017 5:08:16 PM CET Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > Two suggestions were raised as alternatives to the container approach:
> > >
> > > * S
In fact, developer portal would be the best place:
https://developer.fedoraproject.org/deployment.html
Vít
Dne 8.1.2017 v 06:41 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 21:40 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 13:38 +1000, Brenton Horne wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 11:15:28PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:47:35AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> > On Thursday, January 5, 2017 5:08:16 PM CET Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> > > Two suggestions were raised
Having recently begun the process of packing my first RPM, I've been
trying to make my way through the material.
The fact that this thread has attracted three different answers leads me
to believe we may need to do some information architecture work here ...
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Vít
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 07:58 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Jakub Jelinek
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 11:15:28PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:47:35AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, January 5, 2017 5:08:16 PM
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 11:15:35PM +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there a local convention that discussion about containers is using
> top-posting?
>
> "Curious"
Nope. I just posted it without thinking about convention. But if we are
following inline replies on this list, next time onwar
Hi Fedora people,
on January 10th at 00:00:00 UTC we are going to start the Voting
period of Council, FESCo and FAmSCo elections [1]. The Voting period
will end on January 16th, 2017 at 23:59:00 UTC.
If you are around during this period of time, please go to the Voting
machine [2] and provide you
> On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 21:40 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> In fact, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package
> may be even more appropriate (and is more widely known).
Hi,
Someone appears to already have made a new section on that page, although I
find it somewhat confus
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
53 packages were orphaned
-
blktap [el6] was orphaned by kevin
Blktap Userspace Tools + Library
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/blktap
ehcache-parent [m
Start Date: 2017-01-02 10:08:02.072203
End Date: 2017-01-09 10:08:02.072203
Neal Gompa : 10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410379 snap-photobooth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410989
python-phabricator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 10:10 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> In fact, developer portal would be the best place:
>
>
> https://developer.fedoraproject.org/deployment.html
Er, well, the developer portal RPM guide is a very broad overview which
keeps linking to wiki pages for 'more detail'...
(Also, pl
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 14:52 +, Daniel Moerner wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 21:40 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > In fact, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package
> > may be even more appropriate (and is more widely known).
>
> Hi,
>
> Someone appears to already
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 03:47:56AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I don't buy this sort of alarmist bulldung that keeps being claimed with no
> evidence whatsoever to justify radical changes to what Fedora is all about,
> such as:
> * promoting proprietary drivers (making them easier to use, adding
On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 09:50 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> That is interesting. I poked Jan Sedlak and asked him to look whether
> we could mount some images as hdd devices in OpenQA, so that
> potential dd-related problems are discovered immediately.
We planned to do this at the time, just that no-o
On 01/09/2017 10:56 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 03:47:56AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I don't buy this sort of alarmist bulldung that keeps being claimed with no
evidence whatsoever to justify radical changes to what Fedora is all about,
such as:
* promoting proprietary dri
Hi Christophe,
Welcome!
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409780
Good luck with your review. In case things gets stuck (it seems that golang
packaging
is hampered by the lack of approved packaging guidelines), it often helps to
submit
another review in parallel.
Zbyszek
_
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:20:20AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 11:15:28PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:47:35AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Thursday, January 5, 2017 5:08:16 PM CET Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > Two suggestions
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:58:18AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> The complexity of describing what they contain has also led to groups
> within Fedora retroactively just gutting multi-lib support, so for
> example, it's not easy to run ARMv7 binaries on an AArch64 system like
> it is for i686 binaries
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG on 2017-01-10 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
page](https://
19 matches
Mail list logo
