On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 09:43 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> I think we got this sorted out on IRC.
Indeed we did. It required newer versions of the packages that had been
listed, which presumably will be in stable updates some time soon.
> David: if you still see a problem, please let us know.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> Contributors will go through a simliar process as what they currently do
> with RPM Review Requests. There will be Container Reviews as well as
> Container Guidelines:
Absolutely great news.
I have couple of questions regarding Container
> Now that Fedora 25 is out of the door, I'd like to start a discussion about
> the future of officially-supported (meaning rigorously tested) optical media
> for future Fedora releases.
The discussion died off, so let me summarize and propose a plan.
We haven't received as much feedback as I ho
Hi I'm getting this:
[martin@fc25 vdr-epg-daemon]$ fedpkg new-sources vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.70.tar.bz2
Could not execute new_sources:
302 Found
Found
The document has moved https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi";>here.
___
devel mailing lis
more informations:
[martin@fc25 vdr-epg-daemon]$ koji -d hello
2016-12-15 15:28:53,365 [DEBUG] koji: Opening new requests session
2016-12-15 15:28:53,366 [DEBUG] koji: Opening new requests session
2016-12-15 15:28:54,011 [DEBUG] koji: Opening new requests session
Kerberos authentication failed: No
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> Admittedly, I have not gone through the whole thread, but I'd like to
>> point out that I *do* use the DVD and netinstall ISOs for optical
>> media boot on real hardware, though in a somewhat indirect manner.
>> Many of the servers I use have
On 15/12/16 12:20, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi I'm getting this:
[martin@fc25 vdr-epg-daemon]$ fedpkg new-sources vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.70.tar.bz2
Could not execute new_sources:
302 Found
Found
The document has moved https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi";>here.
You need to update
Hi there!
I want to get sponsored into the packager group.
About myself: I am a programmer by trade working in the UTC+0100 timezone. I
contribute regularly to Open Source projects but nothing of any great
significance. In fact my current employer lets me put most new code I write
these days o
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 07:08:13AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Idea #1: Do not block on optical media issues for Alpha and Beta releases
> > ~
> This is the less controversial idea, I believe. We received a concern
> from Mat
thanks for your quick response.
after updating the mentioned program version and running
kinit @FEDORAPROJECT.ORG
the fedpkg new-sources ... works again. :-)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 07:31:29AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > This is interesting. Does IPMI also allow you boot from a "remote
> > USB device"?
> Not any of the servers I've worked with. Only remote DVD boot. I've
> never heard of anyone being able to do remote USB or disk device, as I
> think t
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Now that Fedora 25 is out of the door, I'd like to start a discussion
> about
> > the future of officially-supported (meaning rigorously tested) optical
> media
> > for future Fedora releases.
>
> The discussion died off, so let me summarize
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Trishna Guha wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
>> Contributors will go through a simliar process as what they currently do
>> with RPM Review Requests. There will be Container Reviews as well as
>> Container Guidelines:
>
> Absolut
> I had something weird happen when F23 was the latest release. Somehow,
> probably through user error, I deleted my partition table and bricked my
> only USB stick. I think I corrupted the USB stick firmware somehow. I have
> only one computer so using another to get another copy wasn't an option.
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 11/80 (x86_64), 5/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161214.n.1):
ID: 51331 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL:
Hello,
I'm a newbie and I'm trying to use COPR for the first time. I built
sucessfully a package on my machine, but when I upload the SRPM on COPR
it fails the build.
I can't understand what "rpkgError: Command git commit -m import_srpm -a
returned code 1 with error: " means. What is wrong?
T
On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 07:31 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> and even if it
> did, that would likely be the equivalent of a netinstall, and
> netinstalls are broken until someone does something about how kernel
> package flavors are selected and installed.
Sorry, what do you mean by this? And how is it
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 07:31 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> and even if it
>> did, that would likely be the equivalent of a netinstall, and
>> netinstalls are broken until someone does something about how kernel
>> package flavors are selected
On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 13:22 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 07:31 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > and even if it
> > > did, that would likely be the equivalent of a netinstall, and
> > > netinstalls are broken until some
There will be an outage starting at 2016-12-16 16:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-12-16 16:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be moving backend storage for pagure.org t
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 13:22 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Adam Williamson
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 07:31 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > > and even if it
>> > > did, that would likely be the equival
On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 14:37 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It is essentially the same core issue, yes. It can happen with Yum,
> but for some reason, it happens less often.
yum had rather different logic for resolving ambiguous dependencies
than libsolv does.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Mo
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 14:37 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It is essentially the same core issue, yes. It can happen with Yum,
> > but for some reason, it happens less often.
>
> yum had rather different logic for resolving ambiguous dependencies
> than lib
On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 14:04 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> > On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 14:37 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > It is essentially the same core issue, yes. It can happen with Yum,
> > > but for some reason, it happens less often.
> >
> > yum had rath
On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 15:08 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Workstation live i386
> Kde live x86_64
> Workstation live x86_64
> Kde live i386
>
> Failed openQA tests: 11/80 (x86_64), 5/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20
It's not actually round 2, but more like round 5 or something, because
Chris has been publishing an awful lot of these:
https://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2016/12/redux-compromising-linux-using-snes.html
He shows how to exploit tracker-extract (hopefully mitigated by the new
seccomp sandbox,
On Sunday, December 11, 2016 6:34:38 PM EST Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> As previously announced, releng has made a number of changes as part of
> it's 2016 "flag day".
>
> All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to
> the following package versions (some may b
Kamil Paral wrote:
> - Nobody argued for KDE Live. We probably don't bulk press KDE Live DVDs.
> If we cover Workstation Live, it's improbable that only KDE Live would
> break, but not impossible. If such thing happens, are people OK with
> releasing Fedora XX KDE Live only bootable over USB?
Yet
On December 15, 2016 9:32:36 PM PST, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
>Kamil Paral wrote:
>> - Nobody argued for KDE Live. We probably don't bulk press KDE Live
>DVDs.
>> If we cover Workstation Live, it's improbable that only KDE Live
>would
>> break, but not impossible. If such thing happens, are people OK
On December 15, 2016 8:06:00 PM PST, Steve Grubb wrote:
>On Sunday, December 11, 2016 6:34:38 PM EST Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> Greetings.
>>
>> As previously announced, releng has made a number of changes as part
>of
>> it's 2016 "flag day".
>>
>> All package maintainers will want to make sure
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Adam Miller
>> wrote:
>>> It is with great pleasure that the Fedora Project Announces the availability
>>> of the Fedora Docker Layered Image Build Serv
On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 19:41 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> It's not actually round 2, but more like round 5 or something,
> because
> Chris has been publishing an awful lot of these:
>
> https://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2016/12/redux-compromising-li
> nux-using-snes.html
There's a new u
32 matches
Mail list logo
