Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161204.n.0 changes

2016-12-04 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161203.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161204.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 72 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:2.16

Fedora Rawhide-20161204.n.0 compose check report

2016-12-04 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 54/79 (x86_64), 14/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161203.n.0): ID: 50508 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_se

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2016-12-05 Fedora QA Meeting

2016-12-04 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. We've met the last two weeks and I don't think there's anything much to discuss, unless anyone else has something. We're still cranking up the Fedora 26 engines :) If you think there is something we need to discuss, please do reply to this

how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

2016-12-04 Thread Jack Howarth
While evaluating various Linux distributions for repurposing a MacBook Pro 2,1 as a Linux box, I was pleasantly surprised to find that not only was Fedora unique in producing a bootable disk without resorting to the presence of an OS x partition with eEFind, but that it was unique in being about

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

2016-12-04 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >While evaluating various Linux distributions for repurposing a > MacBook Pro 2,1 as a Linux box, I was pleasantly surprised to find > that not only was Fedora unique in producing a bootable disk without > resorting to the presence of an OS

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

2016-12-04 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jack Howarth > wrote: >>While evaluating various Linux distributions for repurposing a >> MacBook Pro 2,1 as a Linux box, I was pleasantly surprised to find >> that not only was Fedora unique in producing

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

2016-12-04 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >While evaluating various Linux distributions for repurposing a > MacBook Pro 2,1 as a Linux box, I was pleasantly surprised to find > that not only was Fedora unique in producing a bootable disk without > resorting to the presence of an OS

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

2016-12-04 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jack Howarth >> wrote: >>>While evaluating various Linux distributions for repurposing a >>> MacBook Pro 2,1 as a Linux box, I was pleasantly s

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

2016-12-04 Thread Chris Murphy
Pretty sure this predates CONFIG_EFI_MIXED, so it's predicated on creating 32-bit EFI GRUB *and* 32-bit OS which makes it easier to create dedicated media that boots properly. Easier being relative, of course. http://askubuntu.com/questions/392719/32-bit-uefi-boot-support/715843#715843 At least o

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

2016-12-04 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Pretty sure this predates CONFIG_EFI_MIXED, so it's predicated on > creating 32-bit EFI GRUB *and* 32-bit OS which makes it easier to > create dedicated media that boots properly. Easier being relative, of > course. > > http://askubuntu.com/qu

Quality control, does it exist? A recent update removed a keyboard layout from system.

2016-12-04 Thread Iiro Laiho
The update FEDORA-2016-8dfffb0d43 to package xkeyboard-config removed the Finnish (DAS) keyboard layout from the base.xml file. It causes the keyboard layout in question suddenly disappearing from the system without a trace when the unsuspecting user installs updates. Is it really too much aske

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-04 Thread Paul Wouters
On Sat, 3 Dec 2016, Langdon White wrote: Wouldn't it make more sense to be checking for status 200? Checking for content on the page seems fragile in general.  Who says a stolen page wouldn't return status 200? Also, and perhaps related, I filed a bug[1] about captive portals that seems to

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

2016-12-04 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Pretty sure this predates CONFIG_EFI_MIXED, so it's predicated on > creating 32-bit EFI GRUB *and* 32-bit OS which makes it easier to > create dedicated media that boots properly. Easier being relative, of > course. > > http://askubuntu.com/que

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 21:42:07 -0600 Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 12/2/16 7:10 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > > > > Fedora runs a captive portal check page at: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/static/hotspot.txt > > > > It used to return "OK\n". > > > > Now it returns "OK" without the newline. > > See

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-04 Thread Paul Wouters
On Sun, 4 Dec 2016, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 21:42:07 -0600 Eric Sandeen wrote: On 12/2/16 7:10 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: Fedora runs a captive portal check page at: http://fedoraproject.org/static/hotspot.txt It used to return "OK\n". Now it returns "OK" without the newline.

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

2016-12-04 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 16:39 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > That is a different issue. And indeed I see it as well, and was quite > surprised at them checking the TLS validity of a captive portal page. We have no plans to stop doing this, because that's how all other browsers and operating systems wo

Re: Quality control, does it exist? A recent update removed a keyboard layout from system.

2016-12-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Dom, 2016-12-04 at 20:57 +, Iiro Laiho wrote: > The update FEDORA-2016-8dfffb0d43 to package xkeyboard-config removed > the Finnish (DAS) keyboard layout from the base.xml file. It causes > the keyboard layout in question suddenly disappearing from the system > without a trace when the unsus

Re: Quality control, does it exist? A recent update removed a keyboard layout from system.

2016-12-04 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:54:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Dom, 2016-12-04 at 20:57 +, Iiro Laiho wrote: > > The update FEDORA-2016-8dfffb0d43 to package xkeyboard-config removed > > the Finnish (DAS) keyboard layout from the base.xml file. It causes > > the keyboard layout in question

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20161203.n.0 compose check report

2016-12-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 13:56 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default: > 11 packages(s) added since previous compose: audit-libs-python, > checkpolicy, firewalld-selinux, libcgroup, libselinux-python, > libsemanage-p

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-12-05)

2016-12-04 Thread opensource
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Re: yubico-piv-tool & p11-kit

2016-12-04 Thread Jakub Jelen
On 12/03/2016 01:50 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: So apparently yubico-piv-tool ships $libdir/libykpkcs11.so*, but this doesn't get picked up by p11-kit by default. I suspect it has gone unnoticed largely because for most crucial operations the opensc module also works with Yubikeys. However, thi