Re: urw-fonts: Versioning Mess

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:37:18AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:35:19PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 16:07, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mier

MongoDB 3.4-compatiable clients report user agent

To whom may it concern, MongoDB clients started to report implementation identification to a server . It includes operating system and MongoDB driver name and version. Although the shared data are modest

Re: state of advanced audio in Fedora

> Probably not. This bug?: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364332 > Obviously the above bug would need fixing. Yes that's it. But I found that hard limits are correcly set, so you should only do: ulimit -r -l and start jackd from the command line Then you can still use

Re: Rawhide aarch64: gcc bus error

On 12/01/2016 05:45 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Thanks. I've untaged it. Thanks. I've looked at this briefly and it's not clear to me yet what is going on. TLS variable lookup inside mpfr appears to be broken, but the crash does not reproduce with the glibc upstream sources. I don't know

Bodhi problems?

I can't push to stable a couple of updates. Is there any known problem with Bodhi? https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fa485c1c95 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eae6ba26e4 -- Juan Orti https://apuntesderootblog.wordpress.com/ GPG: 61F0 8272 6882 BCA6 3A35 88

Re: Creating an new update is failing

On 11/30/2016 07:10 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: Hi, Hello, I'm trying to create a new update and I'm getting this error: Builds : Unable to create update. Parent instance is not bound to a Session; lazy load operation of attribute 'release' cannot proceed The build looks fine

Re: urw-fonts: Versioning Mess

OK, I will proceed with Domininik's or Zbigniew's idea. Thanks all to your suggestions. :) David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] *Associate Software Engineer* *Brno, Czech Republic* RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. Every airline in the Fortune 500 relies on Red Hat. Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat

Re: Base Runtime prototype build and numerous FTBFS issues

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Petr Šabata wrote: > Hi! > > during the Tuesday's Modularity WG meeting I was talking about the status > of the Base Runtime prototype build and the package build failures we > encountered during our latest attempt. The meeting log is here: > > https://meetbot.fed

Re: Creating an new update is failing

On 12/01/2016 10:55 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 11/30/2016 07:10 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: Hi, Hello, I'm trying to create a new update and I'm getting this error: Builds : Unable to create update. Parent instance is not bound to a Session; lazy load operation of attribute 're

clarification of package naming guidelines

Could someone clarify the rules on package naming ? Background: I've packaged something its author calls SuperLU_DIST using the rpm name superlu_dist. I interpreted that as cons

Re: Creating an new update is failing

On 12/01/2016 07:19 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: > On 12/01/2016 10:55 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: >> On 11/30/2016 07:10 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Hello, I'm trying to create a new update and I'm getting this error: Builds : Unable to create update.

Re: Base Runtime prototype build and numerous FTBFS issues

On 12/01/2016 06:06 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Petr Šabata wrote: >> (Since this is a common question: No, the final Base Runtime module, >> or the Generational Core stack it is part of, won't be self-hosting and >> we won't be shipping the entire set we're current

Re: Creating an new update is failing

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 07:23 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > This problem seems gone, but now I am seeing another one: Also, the search form seems broken again. I'm positive it was working just a couple days ago. I see errors in the WebKit web inspector: [Error] Refused to connect to wss://hub.fedo

Re: Release validation NG: planning thoughts

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 18:20 +0100, Josef Skladanka wrote: > > I would try not to go the third way, because that is really prone to > erros > > IMO, and I'm not sure that "per context" is always right. So for me, the > > "TCMS" part of the

static linking a library

Mercurial upstream is asking about a compression library zstd. Specifically: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-packaging/2016-November/000178.html I believe the proposed solution here: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-packaging/2016-December/000182.html which is

Re: static linking a library

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > Mercurial upstream is asking about a compression library zstd. > > Specifically: > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-packaging/2016-November/000178.html > > I believe the proposed solution here: > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/p

Re: F25 GNOME Shell notification locked up hard for some time

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:52:10 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > So, I will reinstall first, and if it's still reproducible afterwards, > I will be available for some time to answer questions in a bug report. In a fresh install F25 I cannot experience the same issue so far. I had come from a very la

Re: Bodhi problems?

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:49:28 +0100 Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > I can't push to stable a couple of updates. Is there any known problem > with Bodhi? > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fa485c1c95 > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eae6ba26e4 There were some p

Re: clarification of package naming guidelines

Il 01/12/2016 13:35, Dave Love ha scritto: Could someone clarify the rules on package naming ? Background: I've packaged something its author calls SuperLU_DIST using the rpm n

Re: clarification of package naming guidelines

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Mattia Verga wrote: > > So, in my opinion, you did it right naming your package "superlu_dist". > For sure, you MUST not use uppercase letters. I believe there is a bit of leeway for the packager here. You SHOULD not use uppercase; it isn't an edict - it's a gui

f25+: vala 0.34.x+ bug causing .vapi file generation for ALL CURRENT PACKAGE BUILDS to be possibly faulty

I has come to my attention that - since the update to vala from the 0.34.x series has made it into the fedora 25(+) repositories - every package that generates .vapi files during build might have done so incorrectly, because of the following bug, which is present in vala releases up to 0.34.3 (also

failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

Hi, everyone, I have been trying to upgrade my system from f24 to f25 using the cli in the terminal.   814  dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25   815  dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --allowerasing   816  dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --allowerasing -- nog

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 11:32 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: > Hi, everyone, > I have been trying to upgrade my system from f24 to f25 using > the cli in the terminal. > >   814  dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 >   815  dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --allowerasing >   81

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

-Original Message- From: Adam Williamson To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:41:23 -0800 On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 11:32 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: > > Hi, everyone, > I have been try

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:05 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: > > Since the dnf erase command doesn't work, or tries to remove over 211M > of files, do you mean just to remove the directory tree for the > offending package using the rm command? Sorry, I missed that part. I use 'dnf remove', but I don't

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

-Original Message- From: Adam Williamson To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:11:29 -0800 On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:05 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: > > > Since the dnf erase command doesn'

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:15 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Adam Williamson > To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora v...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade > Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:11:29 -0800 >

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

-Original Message- From: Adam Williamson To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:22:31 -0800 On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:15 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: Ad

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

-Original Message- From: Adam Williamson To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:22:31 -0800 On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:15 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: Ad

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On 12/01/2016 12:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:15 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Adam Williamson >> To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora > v...@lists.fedoraproject.org> >> Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Howard Howell wrote: > Now it gets really weird... > # rpm -q --provides google-earth > package google-earth is not installed Should be google-earth-stable, no? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscrib

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

-Original Message- From: Josh Stone To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora , Adam Williamson Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:37:04 -0800 On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Howard Howell wrote: > > Now it gets really weird... > # rpm

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thursday, 01 December 2016 at 21:40, Howard Howell wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Josh Stone > To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora v...@lists.fedoraproject.org>, Adam Williamson rg> > Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 20

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:40 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Josh Stone > To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora v...@lists.fedoraproject.org>, Adam Williamson rg> > Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > > Perhaps dnf thinks google-earth is now the authority on %{_bindir} ? > So removing it is tearing the rug out from under all those others? Well, I don't think so, as I'd expect that to rip out much *more* stuff. I think it must be something

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: >> >> Perhaps dnf thinks google-earth is now the authority on %{_bindir} ? >> So removing it is tearing the rug out from under all those others? > > Well, I don't think so, as I'd expect t

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

-Original Message- From: Adam Williamson To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Josh Stone , Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:54:44 -0800 On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:40 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: > > -Original Message---

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

-Original Message- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 21:54:13 +0100 On Thursday, 01 December 2016 at 21:40, Howard Howell wrote: > >

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 21:54 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 01 December 2016 at 21:40, Howard Howell wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Josh Stone > > To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora > > > v...@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On 30 November 2016 at 23:19, Ahmad Samir wrote: > On 29 November 2016 at 16:24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:39:03AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> On 11/23/2016 02:15 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> >On Ter, 2016-11-22 at 18:57 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >>> >>Hi,

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On 12/01/2016 12:40 PM, Howard Howell wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Josh Stone > To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora v...@lists.fedoraproject.org>, Adam Williamson rg> > Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:37:04 -080

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: Perhaps dnf thinks google-earth is now the authority on %{_bindir} ? So removing it is tearing the rug out from under all those others? Well, I don't think so, as I'd expect that to

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 13:21 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > On 12/01/2016 12:40 PM, Howard Howell wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Josh Stone > > To: hlhow...@pacbell.net, Development discussions related to Fedora > > > v...@lists.fedoraproject.org>, Adam Williamson > ct.o > > rg>

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:32:33 -0800 Howard Howell wrote: > Hi, everyone, > I have been trying to upgrade my system from f24 to f25 using > the cli in the terminal. > >   814  dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 >   815  dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --allowerasing >  

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 21:25 +, John Florian wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > > > > > > > > > Perhaps dnf thinks google-earth is now the authority on %{_bindir} ? > > > > > > So removing it is tea

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 14:32 -0700, stan wrote: > On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:32:33 -0800 > Howard Howell wrote: > > > > > Hi, everyone, > > I have been trying to upgrade my system from f24 to f25 using > > the cli in the terminal. > > > >   814  dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 > >  

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 13:32 -0800, Howard Howell wrote: On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 21:25 +, John Florian wrote: On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: Perhaps dnf thinks google-earth is now the authority on %{_bindir} ? So r

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On 12/01/2016 04:39 PM, Howard Howell wrote: It looks like probably Dominik's suggestion of the -e cleared the program. So somehow, rpm -e packagename seemed to be the magic bullet. I will start overwith the update to make sure all the packages downloaded, and let you know if success happens.

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:03:30 -0500 Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 12/01/2016 04:39 PM, Howard Howell wrote: > > It looks like probably Dominik's suggestion of the -e cleared the > > program. So somehow, rpm -e packagename seemed to be the magic > > bullet. I will start overwith the update to make

Re: Rawhide aarch64: gcc bus error

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 11/30/2016 04:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:08:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:07:13PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: I'm trying to build python-cvxopt, b

Re: Rawhide aarch64: gcc bus error

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 11/30/2016 04:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:08:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:07:13PM -0700, Jerr

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 17:03 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > This got me thinking if there's a common root cause that could be > checked automatically? I didn't quite understand what exactly happened > in the affected packages to cause it. No, they're usually all different little awkward packag

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade: SOLVED

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 14:52 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 17:03 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > This got me thinking if there's a common root cause that could be  > > checked automatically? I didn't quite understand what exactly > > happened  > > in the affected packages

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade: SOLVED

I think you might be missing Google's key: https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade: SOLVED

On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:43:13 -0800 Howard Howell wrote:   > warning: /var/cache/dnf/google-earth-17f28a61f303b7a2/packages/google- > earth-stable-6.0.3.2197-0.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, > key ID 7fac5991: NOKEY > The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next success

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade: SOLVED

On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 03:05 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > I think you might be missing Google's key: > https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/ > > > > Thanks, got it. Regards, Les H___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To u