This thing is not actively maintained upstream; no intent to carry this
any more.
Regards, Joe
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:05:44 +0100
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 21:23, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 11/15/2016 11:33 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > On 11/14/2016 03:57 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > >> Anyone else seeing errors like this?
> > >>
> > >
>> > >> Anyone else seeing errors like this?
>> > >>
>> > >> reading sources... [ 27%]
>> > >> api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic1D reading
>> > >> sources... [ 27%]
>> > >> api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic2D Sphinx
>> > >> Documentation subprocess failed with return code -1
Am 16.11.2016 08:08, schrieb Samuel Rakitničan:
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 18:42 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
What about -E option?
Thanks for that, didn't take this into consideration. -E option
however seems to have no effect on PATH environment variable.
$ sudo -E env | grep ^PATH
PATH=/sbin
On the Fedora wiki, I can subscribe to certain pages. I did that, but I
did not receive any notifications when they were edited. I have added
“Wiki edits” under the “Events referring to my username” filter (which
was quite close to the default before that), and I get notifications for
my own
Hi,
I have this package waiting for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
Marcin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
2016-11-16 1:00 GMT+01:00 :
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.3 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
>
> Am 16.11.2016 08:08, schrieb Samuel Rakitničan:
>
> You can change the default behaviour in "/etc/sudoers" or (better) by
> adding a file in "/etc/sudoers.d".
>
> If you want to keep the users path, add:
>
> Defaults env_keep += "PATH"
> Defaults !secure_path
>
> or to change the (default) s
2016-11-16 15:17 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tunek :
> 2016-11-16 1:00 GMT+01:00 :
>> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.3 is now
>> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
>> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
>> https://fedorapr
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 14:19 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
> > Am 16.11.2016 08:08, schrieb Samuel Rakitničan:
> >
> > You can change the default behaviour in "/etc/sudoers" or (better)
> > by adding a file in "/etc/sudoers.d".
> >
> > If you want to keep the users path, add:
> >
> > Defaults e
OLD: Fedora-25-20161115.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161116.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 6
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
On Wednesday, 16 November 2016 at 10:51, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> > >> Anyone else seeing errors like this?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> reading sources... [ 27%]
> >> > >> api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.Sersic1D reading
> >> > >> sources... [ 27%]
> >> > >> api/astropy.modeling.functional_models.
= Proposed System Wide Change: Debugging Information For Static Libraries =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StaticLibraryDebuginfo
Change owner(s):
* Florian Weimer
This change proposes to ship debugging information in static libraries.
== Detailed Description ==
At present, rpm strips
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:03:42 +0100
Florian Weimer wrote:
> On the Fedora wiki, I can subscribe to certain pages. I did that,
> but I did not receive any notifications when they were edited.
Odd. This definitely worked ok in the past.
> I have added “Wiki edits” under the “Events referring t
On 11/16/2016 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:03:42 +0100
Florian Weimer wrote:
On the Fedora wiki, I can subscribe to certain pages. I did that,
but I did not receive any notifications when they were edited.
Odd. This definitely worked ok in the past.
Does this work f
Dne 16.11.2016 v 16:30 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> On 11/16/2016 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:03:42 +0100
>> Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>>> On the Fedora wiki, I can subscribe to certain pages. I did that,
>>> but I did not receive any notifications when they were edited
On 11/16/2016 04:45 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 16.11.2016 v 16:30 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
On 11/16/2016 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:03:42 +0100
Florian Weimer wrote:
On the Fedora wiki, I can subscribe to certain pages. I did that,
but I did not receive any notif
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 17:02 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 04:45 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 16.11.2016 v 16:30 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> > > On 11/16/2016 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:03:42 +0100
> > > > Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > >
>
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161115.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161116.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 95
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.54 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora 25 Final Go/No-Go Meeting - the 2nd round on 2016-11-17 from 17:00:00
to 19:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering
meet to determine
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161115.n.0):
ID: 48589 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/48589
ID: 48603 Test: x
On 11/15/2016 05:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 17:18 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
As an alternative, I wrote a program that takes the distribution of
trigrams from an English dictionary, and statistically generates a
Markov chain of such overlapping trigrams that look a
On 16/11/16 18:30, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 11/15/2016 05:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 17:18 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
As an alternative, I wrote a program that takes the distribution of
trigrams from an English dictionary, and statistically generates a
Markov
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 56/79 (x86_64), 14/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawh
We would like to change the docker container storage to default to
Overlayfs2 in Fedora 26. But we have a problem on Atomic Host and
Fedora Server distributions.
Currently docker-storage-setup defaults to devicemapper and is hard
coded to setup a thinpool of 40% of remaining disk. Otherwise it
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:32:46PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> We would like to change the docker container storage to default to
> Overlayfs2 in Fedora 26. But we have a problem on Atomic Host and
> Fedora Server distributions.
>
>
> Currently docker-storage-setup defaults to devicemapper an
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 18:55 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
> Atomic qcow2 x86_64
> Workstation live i386
> Kde live x86_64
> Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> Workstation live x86_64
> Kde live i386
>
> Failed openQA tes
On 11/16/2016 02:40 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:32:46PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> We would like to change the docker container storage to default to
>> Overlayfs2 in Fedora 26. But we have a problem on Atomic Host and
>> Fedora Server distributions.
>>
>>
>> Currently
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:49:25PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 02:40 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:32:46PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >> We would like to change the docker container storage to default to
> >> Overlayfs2 in Fedora 26. But we have a pr
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016, at 02:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Today, Fedora Server relies on whatever is the default for
> docker-storage-setup.
> We just tell Anaconda to reserve up to 15GiB by default for the / partition
> and
> then it puts all remaining free space (on drives selected to be u
On 11/16/2016 02:56 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:49:25PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 11/16/2016 02:40 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:32:46PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
We would like to change the docker container storage to default to
>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:01:06PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 02:56 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:49:25PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> On 11/16/2016 02:40 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:32:46PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote
So does exclusive arch actually block the unsupported arches come f26? The
emails are annoying but I'm more concerned that things will be broken when
branch from rawhide happens.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Sunday, November 13, 2016 4:28:26 PM CET Jeremy Newton wro
On 11/16/2016 03:09 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:01:06PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 11/16/2016 02:56 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:49:25PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/16/2016 02:40 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:19:06PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 03:09 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:01:06PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> On 11/16/2016 02:56 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:49:25PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wr
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 3:10:33 PM CET Jeremy Newton wrote:
> So does exclusive arch actually block the unsupported arches come f26?
I probably don't understand the question. This IMO shouldn't be blocker for
Fedora 26 release, just there's the issue that packages which:
BuildArch: n
Does it make sense to move all the products to XFS? An exception may
be possible for cloud images [1]
Server uses XFS. Cloud/Atomic have expressed a preference for it. I
found that ext4 allocates inodes at mkfs time, and there's no way to
get more later, and there's a real possibility with overlay
37 matches
Mail list logo
