On 12/11/16 20:02, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, November 11, 2016 11:12:51 AM CST Stephen Gallagher wrote:
3) My original proposal was: change the fallback name to Fedora- by
default, while of course retaining the ability to set it manually.
I think this is terrible, Just because
On 12/11/16 20:32, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 18:26 +0100, Ms Sanchez wrote:
Oh..! Now I see why the new didn't reach me, I'm not in the legal
list.
So, Fedora 25 will come with MP3 decoders by default, right? That's
pretty nice and should be highlighted somewhere... like
On 12/11/16 23:47, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gstreamer1-plugin-mpg123/
Typo:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mpg123/
Oh! This makes more sense. Thanks.
___
devel mailing list
On 12/11/16 08:13, Kevin Kofler wrote:
How is it "at the expense of every other platform we support"? It's not like
the fix is going to stop them from working. It is not a catastrophe to ship
one week later.
I don't use a Mac, I also don't dual-boot, but still I fail to see why this
issue sho
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:30:47 +0100
Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags
> Updates = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora26CFlags
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Florian Weimer
>
> This change updates the default C/C++ compilation flags, as deter
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 59/101 (x86_64), 16/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161112.n.1):
ID: 47623 Test: x86_64 Workstat
Hi all,
zeromq2 and zeromq3 were additional/compat packages that made it possible
to ship multiple versions of zeromq (namely the old versions 2 and 3).
These days, they don't get any bugfixes anymore and the version 4 should be
used were possible. There should have been enough time to port all
de
On 11/11/16 10:08, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
The reason is pretty simple: very few people have a disposable Mac.
About 90% of the time, the Mac people want to install Fedora on is
their personal laptop. So of course they're not willing to test
installing some random pre-Beta nightly s
Dan Horák wrote:
> We are going to change the default -mcpu for s390(x) from the current
> -mcpu=z9-109 to -mcpu=z10. z10 is the minimum level various projects
> require - llvm/clang, OCaml, pypy3, ... Unfortunately we can't go
> higher because our community guest VM is still running on a z10 mach
OLD: Fedora-25-20161112.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161113.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
Hello!
I'd like to build F25 audacious-plugins with mpg123, but can't because:
1) There is no active buildroot override.
2) I cannot create an own buildroot override, because bodhi doesn't let me.
It claims an override exists, but koji list-tagged f25-override disagrees.
3) The bodhi command-l
You have to find the existing buildroot override in bodhi and change it's
expiry date.
Dennis
On 13 November 2016 8:27:27 am GMT-06:00, Michael Schwendt
wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I'd like to build F25 audacious-plugins with mpg123, but can't because:
>
>1) There is no active buildroot override.
>2) I
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 08:34:18 -0600, den...@ausil.us wrote:
> You have to find the existing buildroot override in bodhi and change it's
> expiry date.
>
That worked:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/mpg123-1.23.8-3.fc25
Thanks!
___
devel mail
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161112.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161113.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:22
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 22
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00
Hi,
I was wondering if any of the RPM guru's know how to fix an issue I'm having.
I keep getting this email:
>orthorobot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
>On ppc64le:
>orthorobot-1.1-4.fc26.noarch requires love
>Please resolve this as soon as possible.
This is because it's noa
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161112.n.0):
ID: 47749 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47749
Old failures (same test failed in 2
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 61/101 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161112.n.2):
ID: 47963 Test: x86_64 universa
On 11/11/16 19:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I realize that some of this is coming from my old-school sensibilities, but I
still remember a time when changing the hostname of a running system caused lots
of things to fail, including NFS and sendmail.
Well... many times I forget to set host
On 11/11/16 19:38, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I am pretty sure most things should work just fine, at least in the
base OS. Sure, some higher level services might be broken still, but
I'd suggest to fix that instead of never changing the hostname...
Changing the enrolling code to modify the ma
On 11/11/16 14:33, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Just to address this specifically, I am referring to Apple's penchant for
stuffing their machines with hardware from vendors that don't play well with
open-source (for example, switching to wifi-only devices and shipping Broadcom
chipsets with no ope
On 11/11/16 15:50, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:13:48PM -, fred...@rambris.com wrote:
I like Fedora- for default hostname. If I don't care to set a hostname
it would be an ok hostname for my machine. I would however like if the hostname
setting wo
Aloha all-
I’m Ron Olson, with the nickname tachoknight. I have been using Unix
since 1989 and Linux since about 1992, when we somehow got an early
version to run on a Gateway2000 machine.
I have submitted for review an update to the Nethack RPM to update it
from 3.4.3 (where it had been for
[Disclaimer: sorry if you've seen this one before, I posted it to desktop@
but I only got one recording. That's not quite enough to call it a dataset,
let alone do any analysis on it. Please do consider the minimal effort
required on your behalf.]
Are you using a touchpad frequently during the day
Thanks for sending this reminder out, Peter, I meant to do this but
completely forgot. Will reply with info from a Thinkpad T450s tomorrow.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> [Disclaimer: sorry if you've seen this one before, I posted it to desktop@
> but I only got one re
On Friday 11 November 2016 12:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> We currently call /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive from
> %__os_install_post. This removes debugging symbols from static (.a)
> libraries.
>
> Is this really a good idea? Due to this, glibc copies libc.a to
> glibc-debuginfo, so t
# F25 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2016-11-14
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We currently have 2 proposed Final blockers and 4 proposed
Final freeze exceptions to review. There are also 6 accepted Final
blockers to check in on.
If you have tim
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting again tomorrow. We had
to delay the F25 Final release last week, so we'll be mainly on release
validation again this week.
If you think there is something we need to discuss, please do reply to
this mail and we can go ahead and schedule the meeting!
27 matches
Mail list logo
