Re: Fwd: Broken dependencies: fedpkg

2016-11-08 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 12:55:21 +0800 Chenxiong Qi wrote: > I have no idea why this happens. Can anyone (maybe Bodhi developers I > guess, I'm not sure) help to solve this? will be fixed in the next compose with http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=815969 Dan >

vim plugins don't need %post{,un} scriptlets anymore

2016-11-08 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, Just a short note to all vim plugins maintainers. Yesterday, I added %transfiletriggerin and %transfiletriggerpostun triggers into vim package [1, 2], therefore you can safely remove your %post{,un} scriptlets, which you used to refresh the documentation. This should be done automatically now.

Re: vim plugins don't need %post{,un} scriptlets anymore

2016-11-08 Thread Vít Ondruch
Just for illustration, this might be the change you want to apply to your plugin: ``` $ git diff diff --git a/vim-commentary.spec b/vim-commentary.spec index 4f75a8f..c275cc3 100644 --- a/vim-commentary.spec +++ b/vim-commentary.spec @@ -46,13 +46,6 @@ install -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{app

Re: ATTN: OCaml 4.04 in Rawhide, could affect POWER, s/390, RHEL 7.4, CentOS 7.4

2016-11-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:04:22PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > OCaml 4.03 has been out for a while. Since OCaml 4.04.0 was released last Friday, we rebased to 4.04.0. This is now ready to test. If you have Rawhide + some package that needs OCaml, then add the following repository and you

Re: ATTN: OCaml 4.04 in Rawhide, could affect POWER, s/390, RHEL 7.4, CentOS 7.4

2016-11-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:04:22PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> OCaml 4.03 has been out for a while. > > Since OCaml 4.04.0 was released last Friday, we rebased to 4.04.0. > > This is now ready to test. If you have Rawhide + some

Re: ATTN: OCaml 4.04 in Rawhide, could affect POWER, s/390, RHEL 7.4, CentOS 7.4

2016-11-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:11:01AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > OK, well just update the rel-eng ticket when you want it merged back > into rawhide. This will hopefully be later today or tomorrow. I've got a few packages that I'm still debugging. Will update the ticket when ready. Rich. --

Orphaning rubygem-heroku{,-api}

2016-11-08 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, I am orphaning rubygem-heroku{,-api} since I was never really user of these. Moreover, there packages are deprecated already and Heroku is going to sunset the Heroku v2 API as well as these packages on April 15, 2017 [1]. Vít [1] https://devcenter.heroku.com/changelog-items/862 __

pygame for ppc64 (rawhide)

2016-11-08 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi all, I'm getting a bunch of broken dependencies mails every day due to a few games I maintain depending on pygame (during runtime) and that is not available on ppc64 / ppc64le. Checking pygame I noticed that Björn Esser has tried to build pygame for ppc but that failed to build. Björn, thank

Re: pygame for ppc64 (rawhide)

2016-11-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm getting a bunch of broken dependencies > mails every day due to a few games I maintain > depending on pygame (during runtime) and > that is not available on ppc64 / ppc64le. A fix should be landing shortly. Peter > Checking

Self Introduction: Dhanesh B. Sabane [UTC+5:30] [dhanesh95]

2016-11-08 Thread Dhanesh B. Sabane
Hello everyone, I'm Dhanesh B. Sabane, an undergrad student from Pune, Maharashtra, India. It's been a while since I got involved with Fedora[1]. I started off with CommOps and Freemedia and now I'm moving over to the *technical* side of Fedora. Learning how to package software for Fedora wa

Re: ATTN: OCaml 4.04 in Rawhide, could affect POWER, s/390, RHEL 7.4, CentOS 7.4

2016-11-08 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:13:32 + "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:11:01AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > OK, well just update the rel-eng ticket when you want it merged back > > into rawhide. > > This will hopefully be later today or tomorrow. I've got > a few package

Re: Self Introduction: Dhanesh B. Sabane [UTC+5:30] [dhanesh95]

2016-11-08 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
Welcome! Also thanks for helping with python-sig wiki-page and onboarding process. Charalampos Stratakis Associate Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat - Original Message - From: "Dhanesh B. Sabane" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 1:33:10

libpeas-gtk is in separate subpackage for Rawhide

2016-11-08 Thread Igor Gnatenko
I pushed commit[0] which separates libpeas-gtk.so.* out of the main package. Reason is that in future libdnf will be dependent on libpeas[1] and we don't want to have minimal system with GTK+ stuff ;) If you will find any regressions / bugs (in libpeas-1.20.0-2.fc26), let me know. Thanks! [0] ht

evolution-data-server soname version bump in rawhide with the 3.23.2 release

2016-11-08 Thread Milan Crha
Hello, the 3.23.2 release of the evolution-data-server contains a soname version bump for libcamel, which contains many API backward incompatible changes. This had been done for easier introspectionability of the libcamel. Most of the affected modules are covered by upstream [1], where som

Re: ATTN: OCaml 4.04 in Rawhide, could affect POWER, s/390, RHEL 7.4, CentOS 7.4

2016-11-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:15:26PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:13:32 + > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:11:01AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > OK, well just update the rel-eng ticket when you want it merged back > > > into rawhide. > > >

Re: Self Introduction: Dhanesh B. Sabane [UTC+5:30] [dhanesh95]

2016-11-08 Thread Dhanesh B. Sabane
On Tuesday 08 November 2016 07:39 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > Welcome! Also thanks for helping with python-sig wiki-page and onboarding > process. > > Charalampos Stratakis > Associate Software Engineer > Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat My pleasure! :) -- Dhanesh B. Sabane dhanes...@fe

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161108.n.1 changes

2016-11-08 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-25-20161107.n.0 NEW: Fedora-25-20161108.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 4 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of

Re: %clisp_arches candidates?

2016-11-08 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Is anybody able to define what architectures contain 'clisp' package? Does it > make sense to have %clisp_arches? Then pleasee have a look at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381120 In part, clisp is constrained by the archite

Fedora 25-20161108.n.1 compose check report

2016-11-08 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161107.n.0): ID: 46551 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/46551 ID: 46615 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64

[Rawhide]Blender failed to build on ppc64le

2016-11-08 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Greetings, While building Blender to fix a minor bug on Rawhide, the failure occurred on pp64le architecture. Other are unaffected because of the success. In that case, can a maintainer of ppc64le architecture addresses the issue? Otherwise, should I exclude ppc64le in the spec file for the time b

2 packages seeking new point of contact

2016-11-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. Due to https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1639 we have orphaned 2 packages that need a new point of contact: rpms/authd -- A RFC 1413 ident protocol daemon ( master f25 f24 f23 ) rpms/python-gudev -- Python (PyGObject) bindings to the GUDev library ( master f25 f24 f23 ) Please

Re: [Rawhide]Blender failed to build on ppc64le

2016-11-08 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Greetings, > > While building Blender to fix a minor bug on Rawhide, the failure > occurred on pp64le architecture. Other are unaffected because of the > success. In that case, can a maintainer of ppc64le architecture > addresses the issue

RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

2016-11-08 Thread Stephen Gallagher
For as long as I can recall, Fedora has shipped with a default hostname of "localhost.localdomain"[1]. This default was "safe" for a very long time because we also shipped an /etc/hosts entry that routed this hostname to the loopback device for the benefit of some older system services (like sendma

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

2016-11-08 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > SUSE generates a random name of the format linux-XX (I'm not sure how many > My proposal is that we should consider changing the default hostname for > Fedora > 26 to be either FED-XXX or FEDORA-. The former a

Re: 2 packages seeking new point of contact

2016-11-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Due to https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1639 we have orphaned 2 packages > that need a new point of contact: > > rpms/authd -- A RFC 1413 ident protocol daemon ( master f25 f24 f23 ) > rpms/python-gudev -- Python (PyGObject)

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

2016-11-08 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > SUSE generates a random name of the format linux-XX (I'm not sure how > > many > > My proposal is that we should consider changing the default hostname for

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

2016-11-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> > SUSE generates a random name of the format linux-XX (I'm not sure how >> > many >> >

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

2016-11-08 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> > SUSE generates a random name of

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

2016-11-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500,

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

2016-11-08 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > >> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Matthe

Re: [Rawhide]Blender failed to build on ppc64le

2016-11-08 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 08/11/16 12:45 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> While building Blender to fix a minor bug on Rawhide, the failure >> occurred on pp64le architecture. Other are unaffected because of the >> success. In that case, can a maintai

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

2016-11-08 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 11/08/2016 06:25 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Stephen

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161108.n.1 changes

2016-11-08 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161107.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161108.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 8 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 131 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 2.04 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora Rawhide-20161108.n.1 compose check report

2016-11-08 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 54/79 (x86_64), 14/15 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

2016-11-08 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Mac OS X and Ubuntu both require the user to pick a machine name at install > time > explicitly. They do not autogenerate one at all. > I'm not sure is it 100% correct, but my knowledge may be outdated. Both macOS and Ubunt

libcdio soname bump in rawhide

2016-11-08 Thread Adrian Reber
Recently libcdio upstream released a new version of libcdio. I will update rawhide to this latest libcdio version and rebuild all dependencies. Adrian signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

2016-11-08 Thread Owen Taylor
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 16:49 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > My proposal is that we should consider changing the default hostname > for Fedora 26 to be either FED-XXX or FEDORA-. The > former allows for a longer random string and therefore lower risk of > collision in large environ