Re: Notifications on dependency retirement

2016-10-23 Thread Julien Enselme
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 19:48 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:51:25AM +0200, Julien Enselme wrote: > > > > > I guess that in this case you mean the (co)maintainer of the > > retired > > package not its dependencies. Can I ask what permissions on the > > package > > are required

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Blivet-GUI in Anaconda

2016-10-23 Thread Samuel Rakitničan
> = Proposed Self Contained Change:Blivet-GUI in Anaconda = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AnacondaBlivetGUI > > Change owner(s): > * Martin Kolman * Vojtěch Trefný > > Add blivet-gui as an alternative option for storage configuration in > Anaconda Installer. > > > == Detailed Desc

RPM %changelog?

2016-10-23 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote: > 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I > roll it > over when I update to the latest upstream? It seems the changelog > could > easily become the bulk of a package if everything is preserved, and > I'd > think git wo

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161023.n.0 changes

2016-10-23 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-25-20161022.n.0 NEW: Fedora-25-20161023.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 71 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 245.68 KiB Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size

Re: RPM %changelog?

2016-10-23 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 10/23/2016 04:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote: 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I roll it over when I update to the latest upstream? It seems the changelog could easily become the bulk of a package if everyth

Re: RPM %changelog?

2016-10-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote: >> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I >> roll it >> over when I update to the latest upstream? It seems the changelog >> could >> easily become the bul

Re: RPM %changelog?

2016-10-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote: >> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I >> roll it >> over when I update to the latest upstream? It seems the changelog >> could >> easily become the bulk

Re: RPM %changelog?

2016-10-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: >> On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote: >>> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I >>> roll it >>> over when I update to the latest u

Fedora 25-20161023.n.0 compose check report

2016-10-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 43302 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/43302 ID: 43318 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openq

Re: RPM %changelog?

2016-10-23 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:35 AM Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 10/23/2016 04:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote: > >> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I > >> roll it > >> over when I update to the latest upstream?

Re: RPM %changelog?

2016-10-23 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 16:31 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > SUSE has a %changelog RPM macro that fixes this by > > moving the changelog into a .changes file stored in the same > directory. > >  Every SUSE package uses it. Probably we should too? > > No. That said, I personally consider SUSE's add

Re: RPM %changelog?

2016-10-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:37:17AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > In Mageia, we use the VCS log as input to dynamically generate the RPM > changelog and append it to the spec as part of the SRPM build process > for the package build. This would be far better than the current situation IMHO. There's n

Re: RPM %changelog?

2016-10-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:39:06PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote: > >> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I > >> roll it > >> over when I update to t

Re: RPM %changelog?

2016-10-23 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:21:25 +, Christopher wrote: > > Our rules is "leave it to the packager's personal preference" and to > > "keep what's important". > > I'm curious, what *IS* important? 1.) Don't copy upstream changelogs into the spec %changelog. 2.) Mention everything that may affect

[Test-Announce] 2016-10-24 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 25 Blocker Review

2016-10-23 Thread Adam Williamson
# F25 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-10-24 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We currently have 2 proposed Final blockers to review. There are also 11 accepted Final blockers to check in on and 3 proposed Final freeze exceptions we could also lo

[Test-Announce] 2016-10-24 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2016-10-23 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2016-10-24 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again tomorrow! We still have the validation results change proposal to kick about