Re: Unknown build target

2016-10-22 Thread Antonio Trande
On 10/22/2016 01:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:55:16 +0200 > Antonio Trande wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> Just a question: >> >> why does Koji not work with specific tags? > ..snip... >> koji: error: Unknown build target: f25-updates-testing > > Because thats not the way it work

review swap

2016-10-22 Thread "besser82" Esser
Hi there! I have some python-packages [1] waiting for review. Any volunteers? Cheers, Björn [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1387834 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to d

-filesystem packages (was: Re: Critpath flags on Emacs and Guile)

2016-10-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 01:24:57 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Probably better to just drop the -filesystem subpackage and make all dependent > packages co-own that dir. Those -filesystem packages are a remnant of time > before repoquery could be used to easily find all packages that use

Re: Critpath flags on Emacs and Guile

2016-10-22 Thread Paul Howarth
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:23:54 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Tom Hughes wrote: > > Because it's packaging some emacs extensions: > > > > % rpm -ql libidn.x86_64 | fgrep emacs > > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/libidn > > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/libidn/idna.el > > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/libidn/idn

Re: /usr/include/math.h:346:1: error: template with C linkage

2016-10-22 Thread Paul Howarth
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:20:32 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > FYI - > > I'm starting to see more builds fail with errors like the following > in rawhide: > > In file included from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/cmath:45:0, > from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/math.h:36, > from

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161022.n.0 changes

2016-10-22 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-25-20161021.n.0 NEW: Fedora-25-20161022.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 83 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:56.89 KiB Size

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Retire Synaptics Driver

2016-10-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:37:38 - "Johannes Lips" wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:17:08 +1000 > > Peter Hutterer > > > > > Yeah, I have never seen that here. > > > > Can you perhaps provide the information Oliver is asking for in the > > bug? > I've just tried libinput again and it seem

Re: /usr/include/math.h:346:1: error: template with C linkage

2016-10-22 Thread Florian Weimer
On 10/22/2016 12:20 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: FYI - I'm starting to see more builds fail with errors like the following in rawhide: In file included from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/cmath:45:0, from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/math.h:36, from /usr/include/cubew/cubew_re

Re: Unknown build target

2016-10-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:12:43 +0200 Antonio Trande wrote: > I Kevin. > > So if i wanted to test a build against packages in updates-testing > wouldn't be possible? nope, because there is no buildroot that populates from updates-testing. This is why we have buildroot overrides for maintainers t

Re: /usr/include/math.h:346:1: error: template with C linkage

2016-10-22 Thread Florian Weimer
On 10/22/2016 03:55 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:20:32 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: FYI - I'm starting to see more builds fail with errors like the following in rawhide: In file included from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/cmath:45:0, from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/ma

Co-maintainer sponsorship

2016-10-22 Thread Christopher
With some of the stuff transitioning from fedorahosted Trac to pagure, and with some of the wiki pages not being concise or up-to-date, can somebody point me to the best current instructions to request a co-maintainer be added? I have a colleague who's helping me update some of my packages, but I'm

Re: Co-maintainer sponsorship

2016-10-22 Thread "besser82" Esser
Am Samstag, den 22.10.2016, 16:22 + schrieb Christopher: > With some of the stuff transitioning from fedorahosted Trac to > pagure, and with some of the wiki pages not being concise or up-to- > date, can somebody point me to the best current instructions to > request a co-maintainer be added? I

Fedora 25-20161022.n.0 compose check report

2016-10-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 5/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161021.n.0): ID: 43161 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/43161 I

Fedora Rawhide-20161022.n.0 compose check report

2016-10-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 11/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161021.n.0): ID: 43276 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/43276 ID: 43282

Python guidelines and removing .egg-info

2016-10-22 Thread "besser82" Esser
Hello together, can someone point me to the part of the Python packaging guidelines, which explicitly says .egg-info *MUST* be removed before build? Cheers, Björn ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Python guidelines and removing .egg-info

2016-10-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sáb, 2016-10-22 at 20:39 +0200, Björn > Hello together, > > can someone point me to the part of the Python packaging guidelines, > which explicitly says .egg-info *MUST* be removed before build? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs#Upstream_Egg_Packages > Cheers, >   Björn

Re: Private Bugzilla bugs

2016-10-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 22 October 2016 at 01:31, Jeff Fearn wrote: > On 22/10/2016 4:54 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 10/21/2016 08:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> We don't run the Bugzilla so the capability of who has it and who does >>> not is not set by us. >> >> Bugzilla's group-based restrictions can be

Re: Python guidelines and removing .egg-info

2016-10-22 Thread "besser82" Esser
Am Samstag, den 22.10.2016, 20:05 +0100 schrieb Sérgio Basto: > On Sáb, 2016-10-22 at 20:39 +0200, Björn  > > Hello together, > > > > can someone point me to the part of the Python packaging > > guidelines, > > which explicitly says .egg-info *MUST* be removed before build? > > > https://fedorap

Dumb newbie packager questions

2016-10-22 Thread Christopher
I should probably know the answers to these by now, but... 1. If I trigger more than one build for the same NVR in Koji, which one will get tagged, and when? Which one will Bodhi use when I create an update? 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I roll it over when I up

Re: Dumb newbie packager questions

2016-10-22 Thread William Moreno
El 22/10/2016 9:51 p. m., "Christopher" escribió: > > I should probably know the answers to these by now, but... > > 1. If I trigger more than one build for the same NVR in Koji, which one will get tagged, and when? Which one will Bodhi use when I create an update? By default koji will not let bu

Re: Dumb newbie packager questions

2016-10-22 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:09 AM William Moreno wrote: > El 22/10/2016 9:51 p. m., "Christopher" > escribió: > > > > I should probably know the answers to these by now, but... > > > > 1. If I trigger more than one build for the same NVR in Koji, which one > will get tagged, and when? Which one w

Re: Dumb newbie packager questions

2016-10-22 Thread William Moreno
El 22/10/2016 10:27 p. m., "Christopher" escribió: > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:09 AM William Moreno wrote: >> >> El 22/10/2016 9:51 p. m., "Christopher" escribió: >> > >> > I should probably know the answers to these by now, but... >> > >> > 1. If I trigger more than one build for the same NV

Re: Dumb newbie packager questions

2016-10-22 Thread Christopher
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:36 AM William Moreno wrote: > El 22/10/2016 10:27 p. m., "Christopher" > escribió: > > > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:09 AM William Moreno < > williamjmore...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> El 22/10/2016 9:51 p. m., "Christopher" > escribió: > >> > > >> > I should probab