I definitely fixed this issue:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/commit/2eed58c4ea09729f17e8c672196318d7028b0dba
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:34:07 -0400
> Avram Lubkin wrote:
>
>> Seems like this issue is almost a year old.
>
> Sadly
Hello,
A user posted some issue on gnutls [0], and it turned out that after a
fresh install of f24 that user had two versions of the library
installed. I have no idea why this can be or whether that should be
expected from the installer/updater. Any insights?
regards,
Nikos
[0]. https://bugzilla
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:32:40PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> * IMHO the initial upstream default didn't make sense for Fedora
>
> On this specific change, I'm not sure the *updated* default makes sense
> either. It still is quite constra
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
> Hello,
> A user posted some issue on gnutls [0], and it turned out that after a
> fresh install of f24 that user had two versions of the library
> installed. I have no idea why this can be or whether that should be
> expected from
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 5/89 (x86_64), 3/16 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 35652 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35652
ID: 35
On 09/22/2016 09:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:32:40PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* IMHO the initial upstream default didn't make sense for Fedora
On this specific change, I'm not sure the *updated* default makes sense
either. It still is quite constrained.
* Perhaps
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 7/98 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 35749 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/35749
ID: 35750 Test: x86_
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 15:24 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
>
> Xfce raw-xz armhfp
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
>
> Failed openQA tests: 7/98 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
If anyone's wondering where the nice 'compare to previous compos
Hi team,
Could someone do a review of f25-backgrounds before the beta freeze on
September 27?
It is a critical package because it contains the default wallpapers for
F25 release.
The link is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378971
Thanks in advance.
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & W
Hi,
I just orphaned oflb-riordonfancy-fonts - it is a FTBFS package I tried
to save from retirement a while ago thinking that maintaining a font
should not be that hard. However I realized I do not have the time to
get to understand why it does not build. Therefore I orphaned it for now
and will r
hi
Il 23/09/2016 19:49, Luya Tshimbalanga ha scritto:
Hi team,
Could someone do a review of f25-backgrounds before the beta freeze on
September 27?
It is a critical package because it contains the default wallpapers for
F25 release.
The link is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13789
I plan to retire festival before f25 beta unless someone else wants to
take it over.
It really needs a lot of work to update it to a current version. Also recently
outside changes have resulted in it segfaulting (even after a rebuild) and
it is currently unusable.
Hi,
after updating to Gnome 3.22 it seems that at least evolution[1] and
epiphany[2] are broken but I'm affraid the problem affects any app which
deals with html conten.
So please unpush that update and fix the problem ASAP.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378985
[2] https://
The rawhide build is now complete.
On 18.09.2016 13:05, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'll be updating to podofo-0.9.4 in rawhide next weekend. This update
includes a soname bump, and the following packages will need to be
rebuilt:
calibre
fontmatrix
krename
scribus
I don't have commit access to
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 02:44:31PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I plan to retire festival before f25 beta unless someone else wants
> to take it over.
I think you should do it. Updated packages are likely to be so
different that they deserve a re-review anyway.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Proje
On 23/09/16 12:44 PM, gil wrote:
> hi
>
> Il 23/09/2016 19:49, Luya Tshimbalanga ha scritto:
>> Hi team,
>>
>> Could someone do a review of f25-backgrounds before the beta freeze on
>> September 27?
>> It is a critical package because it contains the default wallpapers for
>> F25 release.
>>
>> The
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'll be updating to podofo-0.9.4 in rawhide next weekend. This update
> includes a soname bump, and the following packages will need to be rebuilt:
>
> calibre
> fontmatrix
> krename
> scribus
>
> I don't have commit access to any of th
On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 11:37 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> Well... we certainly need to port it sooner or later although I
> understand that effort will be quite non-trivial.
You mean port libp11? That's already working against OpenSSL 1.1, isn't
it? We just need to ensure we can ship a version of lib
# F25 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2016-09-26
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We currently have 2 proposed Beta blockers and 8 proposed
Final blockers to review.
If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blo
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2016-09-26
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! We have some Test Days coming up to
check in on, Beta is coming up
20 matches
Mail list logo
