On 16/09/16 12:55 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:54:57 -0500
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 10:33 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Given how hard it is to enable those notifications correctly, we
> should just enable them by default for everyone. Or at least fo
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 17/92 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160916.n.0):
ID: 34771 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:30:34 +0100
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 16/09/16 12:55 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:54:57 -0500
> >Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 10:33 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >> > Given how hard it is to enable those notificatio
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 20:50 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> -jas_stream_t *jas_stream_memopen(char *buf, int bufsize);
>> +jas_stream_t *jas_stream_memopen(char *buf, size_t bufsize);
>
> I should add: it probably needs to use ssize_t (signed size_t) here.
> But this fun
Erik Logtenberg wrote:
> On a side note, I am still puzzled that this package is non-functional
> in Fedora. Volker said he couldn't test on all Fedora releases, but is
> it not basic Fedora QA policy to at the very least test if a package
> actually runs on the current release with default setting
