We definitely needed something like that, great!
Do you think it would make sense to split the instructions into two parts?
Something like:
1. Prepare your environment to make it work with our dev infra - "the stuff
you won't need to do in the future"
2. Build a module - "The actual workflow"
I
Hi Antonio,
I think Igor took ownership yesterday after I orphaned them
Best,
Mario
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 at 15:09 Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 08/30/2016 11:26 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > I'm orphaning the following packages due to not enough time to be a
> > proper mantainer:
> >
>
Hi,
For the person who not attend Flock 2016 event.
As I knew the useful page for the event today, let me announce you.
You can watch videos and slices from following page.
Flock 2016 Talks (Slides, Videos)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flock_2016_Talks
As the page has links to slides and vide
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
> I think Igor took ownership yesterday after I orphaned them
Yes, I took them and added all ACLs for Mario. In week or two I will
go through all bugs and will comment them and update packages.
>
> Best,
> Mario
>
> On Tue, 30 Aug
2016-08-30 15:08 GMT+02:00 Antonio Trande :
> On 08/30/2016 11:26 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I'm orphaning the following packages due to not enough time to be a
>> proper mantainer:
>>
>> * dcmtk (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dcmtk/)
>> * gdcm (https://admin.fedor
Hello all,
While checking out the SPEC file of python, it seems there were some packages
that, while separate at some point, they got included in python's stdlib and
then obsoleted as standalone packages (thus to cope with the change, python was
obsoleting these packages and providing them as w
And a clarification here:
The plan for renaming python is only for rawhide, while removing the
Obsoletes/Provides might as well go in F25 as well, depending on the time frame
that maintainers will be able to fix their packages.
Regards,
Charalampos Stratakis
Associate Software Engineer
Python
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:32:39AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> We definitely needed something like that, great!
>
> Do you think it would make sense to split the instructions into two parts?
> Something like:
>
> 1. Prepare your environment to make it work with our dev infra - "the stuff
> you w
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 32/89 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 31403 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31403
ID: 31405 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-i
After reading (some of) the "discussion" about systemd-logind's
KillUserProcesses setting, I decided that I'd like to try enabling it
and see how it works and how I can make it useful in my environment.
Sorry, it's long, but I though folks might want to know.
Disclaimer:
I quite like systemd and
On 29/08/16 18:25, Laura Abbott wrote:
Please test and give karma again. A reminder that if you do find
regressions please note on the bodhi update corresponding to the
kernel you tested AND file a bugzilla with information.
It's somewhat hard since the corresponding kernel-devel packages s
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
>
> On 29/08/16 18:25, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>
>>
>> Please test and give karma again. A reminder that if you do find
>> regressions please note on the bodhi update corresponding to the
>> kernel you tested AND file a bugzilla with information.
ba23b72efb5e5529b80c47c5dd764d37 Mail-Sender-0.902.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Mail-Sender/Mail-Sender-0.902.tar.gz/md5/ba23b72efb5e5529b80c47c5dd764d37/Mail-Sender-0.902.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-
> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts writes:
JLT>I've found that if the user's user manager dies (for any reason
JLT>you might choose) and linger is enable for them, a new one won't
JLT>be started at login. They have to disable linger, log out, and
JLT>log back in. Or reboot the mach
On 31/08/16 16:41, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 29/08/16 18:25, Laura Abbott wrote:
Please test and give karma again. A reminder that if you do find
regressions please note on the bodhi update corresponding to the
kernel you tested AND file a bu
>>> Please test and give karma again. A reminder that if you do find
>>> regressions please note on the bodhi update corresponding to the
>>> kernel you tested AND file a bugzilla with information.
>>>
>>
>> It's somewhat hard since the corresponding kernel-devel packages seems to be
>> missing. Is
Please test and give karma again. A reminder that if you do find
regressions please note on the bodhi update corresponding to the
kernel you tested AND file a bugzilla with information.
>>> It's somewhat hard since the corresponding kernel-devel packages seems to
>>> be
>>> miss
On 08/31/2016 02:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
More appropriate place would be to post this upstream either on the
mailinglist and or as an bug/rfs in the tracker so this issues can be
addressed properly.
Lingering is a per-user thing so it probably ends up being an per user
opt in feat
On 31/08/16 17:15, Peter Robinson wrote:
Perhaps. But this has been a common problem for me with many recent kernel
updates. But if it's only me, I presume it's the mirror.
Tried with "dnf upgrade --refresh" ?
--
I'm more the sledgehammer type, so I did dnf clean all. But to no avail.
--ale
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 15/89 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386)
ID: 31513 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31513
ID: 31514 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso insta
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
>
> On 31/08/16 17:15, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps. But this has been a common problem for me with many recent
>>> kernel
>>> updates. But if it's only me, I presume it's the mirror.
>>
>> Tried with "dnf upgrade --refresh" ?
>> --
>
Thanks for your responses. I think I'll use
- As the main name for the package: python-sphinx-theme-py3doc-enhanced
- A provide for python-sphinx_py3doc_enhanced_theme
This way it can be installed with a nice and consistant name as well
with its upstream name.
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 10:25 -0400,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:25:22AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Hope this is interesting to someone and adds useful content to the
> discussion.
I think it does — thanks for your real-world observations!
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapro
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2016-09-02 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2016-09-02 09:00 Fri US/Pacific PDT
2016-09-02 12:00 Fri US/Eastern EDT
2016-09-02 1
Of course the date is wrong, due to it already being tomorrow UTC. So
the actual date/time is:
2016-09-01 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2016-09-01 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2016-09-01 16:00 Thu UTC <-
2016-09-01 17:00 Thu Europe/London BST
2016-09-01 18:00 Thu Europe/Pa
Hello my fellow Fedora friends!
It's 01:00 in my local time and perhaps I should be resting instead of
trying to figure out chicken-and-egg problems at such a time, but my
tired mind is on the fence about the solution to one of my tickets and
I would love the input of others:
https://bugzilla.red
26 matches
Mail list logo
