Orphaning packages

Dear all, I'm orphaning the following packages due to not enough time to be a proper mantainer: * InsightToolkit ( https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/InsightToolkit/) * dcmtk (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dcmtk/) * gdcm (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/p

Re: Samba DC NT4 Style is Gone. It may be time to enable AD-DC for default into Fedora Samba4 packages?

On Monday, 29 August 2016 18:16:26 CEST Dario Lesca wrote: > This recent Microsoft's Patch > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-August/202197.html > > disable password change for Domain Controller NT4 Style. It is not knew that Microsoft dropped support for NT4 style domain controllers.

Re: Samba DC NT4 Style is Gone. It may be time to enable AD-DC for default into Fedora Samba4 packages?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote: > On Monday, 29 August 2016 18:16:26 CEST Dario Lesca wrote: >> >> My question is: >> >> There is some hope that in the short this flags are enable by default? >> >> Many thanks for your reply > > Yes, we will enable Samba AD as soon as I'm

Re: Samba DC NT4 Style is Gone. It may be time to enable AD-DC for default into Fedora Samba4 packages?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote: > On Monday, 29 August 2016 18:16:26 CEST Dario Lesca wrote: >> This recent Microsoft's Patch >> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-August/202197.html >> >> disable password change for Domain Controller NT4 Style. > > It is not knew

Re: Samba DC NT4 Style is Gone. It may be time to enable AD-DC for default into Fedora Samba4 packages?

Il giorno mar, 30/08/2016 alle 11.35 +0200, Andreas Schneider ha scritto: > On Monday, 29 August 2016 18:16:26 CEST Dario Lesca wrote: > > > > This recent Microsoft's Patch  > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-August/202197.html > > > > disable password change for Domain Controller NT4

Re: Orphaning packages

On 08/30/2016 11:26 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote: > Dear all, > I'm orphaning the following packages due to not enough time to be a > proper mantainer: > > * dcmtk (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dcmtk/) > * gdcm (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gdcm/) > > I'll st

[Test-Announce] Announcing the release of Fedora 25 Alpha!

The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the Fedora 25 Alpha, an important milestone on the road to our Fedora 25 release in November. Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site: * https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/prerelease/ * https://getfedora.org/en/

Fedora 25-20160830.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 16/89 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386) ID: 31297 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31297 ID: 31298 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso insta

Fedora Rawhide-20160830.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 33/89 (x86_64), 6/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 31187 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31187 ID: 31189 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-i

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160830.n.0 compose check report

On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 19:38 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > > Failed openQA tests: 33/89 (x86_64), 6/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) So today we got a new anaconda which breaks when booted in UEFI: https://bugzilla.redhat.

[Modularity] Messing around with building modules

Hi all! First, check out the logs/minutes from today's Modularity WG meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/modularity_wg/modularity_wg.2016-08-30-15.00.html We identified that we needed a doc on how to fool around with our prototype build infrastructure (partly staging, partly a dev e