On 2016-08-23 10:19, Julien Enselme wrote:
Hi,
Recently I opened a review [1] for a new sphinx theme:
py3doc_enhanced_theme [2]
The upstream name is sphinx_py3doc_enhanced_theme, so in my opinion,
the the package should be named python-sphinx_py3doc_enhanced_theme.
Furthermore, there's another
On 08/23/2016 05:06 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/23/2016 04:44 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else s
On 08/24/2016 12:29 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else s
On 08/24/2016 08:41 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/24/2016 12:29 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ide
> "RM" == Robert Marcano writes:
RM> I wonder if the default setting for
RM> network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris=https:// is or isn't a leak.
My understanding (from talking to npmccallum and ab/abbra at flock) is
that the security and disclosure issues with that have been fixed to the
satisf
Frankly I think upstream should have called it py3doc_enhanced and left out
sphinx and theme, but that's beside the point.
Based on the package naming conventions [1], you name is mainly correct
(more on this later). In the Python modules section [2], it says:
The package name should reflect the
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/24/2016 12:29 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ideas
On 08/24/2016 10:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Robert Marcano wrote:
...
I wonder if the default setting for
network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris=https:// is or isn't a leak.
No, it is not, at least not to the remote server you are trying to
visit.
Kerberos flow is alwa
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora 25 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting - 2nd round on 2016-08-25 from 17:00:00 to
19:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the second round of Fedora 25 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting.
Release Candidate (RC) av
Dne 23.8.2016 v 20:11 Björn Esser napsal(a):
> Thanks you very much for the reviews! ^^
>
> We need a compat-pkg for rubygem-listen, I'm afraid… :(
Why?
Vít
>
>
> Am 23.08.2016 um 19:45 schrieb gil:
>> hi
>>
>> damm i dont know what happen!
>>
>> $ fedora-review -b 1368851 --plugins Ruby
I'm trying to build a new package. It completed with no issues on F26
(rawhide) and F24. However, the build keeps failing on F25
Here is the build link which is reporting the error? Why would this fail
only on F25? Doesn't make much sense.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskI
Here is what the log shows for F25:
+ appstream-util validate-relax --nonet
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/plasma-applet-weather-widget-1.6.7-2.fc25.x86_64/usr/share/appdata/org.kde.weatherWidget.appdata.xml
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/plasma-applet-weather-widget-1.6.7-2.fc25.x86_64/usr/share/appdata/o
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I'm trying to build a new package. It completed with no issues on F26
> (rawhide) and F24. However, the build keeps failing on F25
I've done quite a few builds of late and had no issues at all.
> Here is the build link which is reporti
Thanks Peter... I posted the results from both F25 and F24... does that
offer a clue?
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > I'm trying to build a new package. It completed with no issues on F26
> > (rawhide) and F24.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Thanks Peter... I posted the results from both F25 and F24... does that
> offer a clue?
Nope, but I don't have time to really investigate but it's not a koji
issue. You might want to check the root.log file and compare the
package list so s
Ok, worse case I can just skip F25 for this package.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > Thanks Peter... I posted the results from both F25 and F24... does that
> > offer a clue?
>
> Nope, but I don't have time to r
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:05:33 -0700
"Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> I'm trying to build a new package. It completed with no issues on F26
> (rawhide) and F24. However, the build keeps failing on F25
>
> Here is the build link which is reporting the error? Why would this
> fail only on F25? Doesn'
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 60/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 29757 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29757
ID: 29758 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso in
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 10/89 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386)
ID: 29875 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29875
ID: 29876 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_defa
Am Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:23:27 -0700
schrieb "Gerald B. Cox" :
> Here is what the log shows for F25:
>
>
> + appstream-util validate-relax --nonet
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/plasma-applet-weather-widget-1.6.7-2.fc25.x86_64/usr/share/appdata/org.kde.weatherWidget.appdata.xml
> /builddir/build/BUIL
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Jens Lody wrote:
> If you look at the build.log you can see, that for whatever reason the
> appdata.cml-file does not get installed on F25, so it can not be found
> by appstream-util .
>
> Jens
>
Yes, I saw that... but I if you look at the rawhide and F24 build,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369954
I'm not sure what's caused this, I'm still trying to track it down.
But enforcing=0 does work around it. It might be a recent
selinux-policy of systemd update that's broken it.
--
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
It's already been dealt with, see RHBZ #1368745.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> It's already been dealt with, see RHBZ #1368745.
Thanks. Kinda surprising -12 made it to stable...
--
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedorapro
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
>> It's already been dealt with, see RHBZ #1368745.
>
> Thanks. Kinda surprising -12 made it to stable...
So even after 'dnf clean all' the -13 version that should fix this
prob
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> So even after 'dnf clean all' the -13 version that should fix this
> problem is not listed as an update in either updates or
> updates-testing. Is that expected?
It hasn't been that long since the update left the pending state, so
I'm guess
Already resolved the problem… Was an over-strict requirement for
rubygem-listen >= 3.0 < 3.1 in rubygem-jekyll-watch to compat for
Ruby-MRI 1.9.3…
Am 24.08.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Vít Ondruch:
Dne 23.8.2016 v 20:11 Björn Esser napsal(a):
Thanks you very much for the reviews! ^^
We need a c
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:26 AM Mikolaj Izdebski
wrote:
> On 08/19/2016 09:51 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > Interesting... it still won't give me the drop-down box to be able to
> > change it.
> > It's weird, because I can change
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308662
> > I had assu
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:34:43 -0700
"Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> Ok, worse case I can just skip F25 for this package.
The sources file is messed up. It has the spec listed... (which you
requested be removed from lookaside).
You should do:
fedpkg new-sources plasma-applet-weather-widget-1.6.7.tar.g
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 20:42 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
> Failed openQA tests: 60/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
I'm still working on the Rawhide needle re-takes - an annoying bug in
the openQA needle e
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:06:15 +
Christopher wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:26 AM Mikolaj Izdebski
> wrote:
>
> > On 08/19/2016 09:51 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > > Interesting... it still won't give me the drop-down box to be
> > > able to change it.
> > > It's weird, because I can chang
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:06:15 +
> Christopher wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:26 AM Mikolaj Izdebski
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 08/19/2016 09:51 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > > > Interesting... it still won't give me the drop-down box to
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> That said, that doesn't get it working on f25 either.
>
> I suspect there's some update thats gone stable in f24 and is in
> rawhide, but isn't stable yet in f25 due to the alpha freeze causing
> the failure. Perhaps something in the kf5 stack
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:53:52 -0700
"Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > That said, that doesn't get it working on f25 either.
> >
> > I suspect there's some update thats gone stable in f24 and is in
> > rawhide, but isn't stable yet in f25 due to th
Hi folks! Just wanted to keep everyone informed.
We had a bit of a panic drill with the Alpha today; it turns out the
Cloud images are completely broken, and in fact have been for months,
only apparently no-one bothers to look at the output of our shiny
automated test systems (autocloud has been r
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate Alpha-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the c
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2016-08-25 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2016-08-25 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2016-08-25 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2016-08-25 1
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 10/88 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 29979 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29979
ID: 29989 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso in
38 matches
Mail list logo
