Review request: perl-String-Copyright

2016-08-12 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi Another new licensecheck dependency: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366511 - perl-String-Copyright - Representation of text-based copyright statements Happy to review in exchange. Sandro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/adm

Re: Review request: perl-String-Copyright

2016-08-12 Thread gil
Il 12/08/2016 09:45, Sandro Mani ha scritto: Hi Another new licensecheck dependency: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366511 - perl-String-Copyright - Representation of text-based copyright statements Happy to review in exchange. Sandro hi take! can you review this https://

Review request/swap: ardour5

2016-08-12 Thread Nils Philippsen
Hi there, I'm looking for someone to review version 5 of Ardour which was just released: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364542 It's not very different from the ardour4 package already in Fedora, so the review shouldn't be too complicated. I'll happily review another package in retu

Re: Review request/swap: ardour5

2016-08-12 Thread gil
Il 12/08/2016 10:05, Nils Philippsen ha scritto: Hi there, I'm looking for someone to review version 5 of Ardour which was just released: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364542 It's not very different from the ardour4 package already in Fedora, so the review shouldn't be too com

Re: Review request/swap: ardour5

2016-08-12 Thread Nils Philippsen
Hi Gil, On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 10:09 +0200, gil wrote: > > Il 12/08/2016 10:05, Nils Philippsen ha scritto: > > > > Hi there, > > > > I'm looking for someone to review version 5 of Ardour which was > > just > > released: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364542 > > > > It's

need help with gcc segfault on i686

2016-08-12 Thread Till Hofmann
Hi all, gprolog has been FTBFS for a while due to a segfault on i686, see this build [1] for an example. I followed advice on [2] to add some debugging flags, not sure if they really help though without access to dumped files. The segfault occurs while compiling this file [3]. Do you have any gen

Re: need help with gcc segfault on i686

2016-08-12 Thread Florian Weimer
On 08/12/2016 11:36 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: Hi all, gprolog has been FTBFS for a while due to a segfault on i686, see this build [1] for an example. I followed advice on [2] to add some debugging flags, not sure if they really help though without access to dumped files. The segfault occurs while

Re: need help with gcc segfault on i686

2016-08-12 Thread Dan Horák
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:36:11 +0200 Till Hofmann wrote: > Hi all, > > gprolog has been FTBFS for a while due to a segfault on i686, see this > build [1] for an example. I followed advice on [2] to add some > debugging flags, not sure if they really help though without access > to dumped files. Th

[Modularity] Announcing base runtime

2016-08-12 Thread Petr Šabata
Now that our Modularity infrastructure is in a good enough shape to build RPM-based modules, it's about time we start creating some modular content. For organizational purposes, we decided to create a separate Modularity group that would focus on defining a base set of modules that other, mostly a

ANN: Fedora/RISC-V now needs your help

2016-08-12 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
[I'm hoping not to make too many announcements about this, but this is significant because I've finally reached a stage where other people can pitch in.] RISC-V is a new open processor architecture. The instruction set is patent free and freely implementable, and implementations are distributed u

Re: Review request/swap: ardour5

2016-08-12 Thread gil
Il 12/08/2016 10:56, Nils Philippsen ha scritto: Hi Gil, On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 10:09 +0200, gil wrote: Il 12/08/2016 10:05, Nils Philippsen ha scritto: Hi there, I'm looking for someone to review version 5 of Ardour which was just released: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=136454

Fedora Rawhide-20160812.n.0 compose check report

2016-08-12 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 19/82 (x86_64), 4/16 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 28289 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-08-12)

2016-08-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-08-12) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:01:05 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-08-12/fesco

Fedora 25 Alpha blocker status mail #1

2016-08-12 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! We're in Alpha freeze and Alpha go/no-go is scheduled for next week (2016-08-18), so it's time for the first blocker status mail. tl;dr action summary 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365661 ACTION: releng/Cloud teams to figure out the problem, if it

Re: Review request/swap: ardour5

2016-08-12 Thread gil
please try with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363921 Il 12/08/2016 10:56, Nils Philippsen ha scritto: Hi Gil, On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 10:09 +0200, gil wrote: Il 12/08/2016 10:05, Nils Philippsen ha scritto: Hi there, I'm looking for someone to review version 5 of Ardour which

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2016-08-15 Fedora QA Meeting

2016-08-12 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel Monday's QA meeting. There isn't any urgent business for that meeting that I'm aware of, we have the blocker review meeting to discuss F25 Alpha issues, and Go/No-Go for Alpha is coming up so I'm expecting we'll be focused on F25 Alpha testing. If you do have somet

[Test-Announce] 2016-08-15 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 25 Blocker Review

2016-08-12 Thread Adam Williamson
# F25 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-08-15 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We currently have 1 proposed Alpha blocker and 2 proposed Beta blockers to review. There are also 4 accepted blockers to check in on. If you have time this week