Re: Pending ACLs

2016-08-08 Thread Helio Chissini de Castro
Not works. You need then talk with the requester and then decide to deny or not. And if he tries again, do the process again. What you can' t do is letting anyone waiting or making the package hostage. About the notifications, yes, everyone get notifications if set your email properly or use @fed

Long live YUM!

2016-08-08 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
I updated my system today and noticed that one of updated packages was "yum". Yes, that package manager tool we were supposed to obsolete with switch to "dnf" few releases ago. So I decided to remove it: 11:53 root@puchatek:~# LANGUAGE=C dnf remove yum Dependencies resolved. =

Re: Long live YUM!

2016-08-08 Thread Christopher Meng
On Monday, 8 August 2016, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > I updated my system today and noticed that one of updated packages was > "yum". Yes, that package manager tool we were supposed to obsolete with > switch to "dnf" few releases ago. > > So I decided to remove it: > > 11:53 root@puchatek:~# LANG

Re: Long live YUM!

2016-08-08 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:02:35 +0800 Christopher Meng wrote: > On Monday, 8 August 2016, Marcin Juszkiewicz > wrote: > > > I updated my system today and noticed that one of updated packages > > was "yum". Yes, that package manager tool we were supposed to > > obsolete with switch to "dnf" few rele

Re: [HEADS UP] sendmail-devel will be renamed to sendmail-milter-devel

2016-08-08 Thread Paul Howarth
On 05/08/16 19:03, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote: Hi, this change is indeed happening only in F26 and later. There are no plans to do the rename in earlier releases. However, I'm not sure where the "0%{?rhel} > 7" condition in your spec sample came from. I have no idea when the rename will get to RHEL,

Re: Long live YUM!

2016-08-08 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 08.08.2016 o 12:02, Christopher Meng pisze: > On Monday, 8 August 2016, Marcin Juszkiewicz >> 11:53 root@puchatek:~# LANGUAGE=C dnf remove yum >> Dependencies resolved. >> >> Package ArchVers

Re: Can I request update of mock with fedora-25 configurations ?

2016-08-08 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Dom, 2016-08-07 at 03:17 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sáb, 2016-08-06 at 20:40 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > After Fedora 25 Mass Branching , should be mock update with > > > fedora- > > > 25 > > > configurations  ? > > > Other que

Re: Can I request update of mock with fedora-25 configurations ?

2016-08-08 Thread Peter Robinson
>> > > Hello, >> > > After Fedora 25 Mass Branching , should be mock update with >> > > fedora- >> > > 25 >> > > configurations ? >> > > Other question where I should ask it ? bugzilla ? >> > bugzilla +1 >> Thanks, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364754 > > Hi, > Anyone, can tell me h

Re: Long live YUM!

2016-08-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 08.08.2016 o 12:02, Christopher Meng pisze: >> On Monday, 8 August 2016, Marcin Juszkiewicz > >>> 11:53 root@puchatek:~# LANGUAGE=C dnf remove yum >>> Dependencies resolved. >>>

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2016-08-08 Thread nobody
Change in package status over the last 168 hours 3 packages were orphaned compat-gnutls28 [master] was orphaned by nmav Compat package with gnutls library ABI version 28 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packag

Re: [HEADS UP] sendmail-devel will be renamed to sendmail-milter-devel

2016-08-08 Thread Ondřej Lysoněk
Hi, after some investigation, I think you are right :). Thanks! I fixed it and a new version sendmail-8.15.2-9.fc26 is currently being built. Regards Ondra On 08/05/2016 12:14 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: Hi, On 29/07/16 14:26, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote: Hi, on Friday, August 5, I will rebuild the

Reviews Weekly

2016-08-08 Thread nobody
Start Date: 2016-08-01 08:45:39.575096 End Date: 2016-08-08 08:45:39.575096 Jeroen van Meeuwen : 114 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364676 nodejs-try-open https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364148 nodejs-glob-base https://bugzilla.redhat.com

rubygem-thin license change

2016-08-08 Thread Jun Aruga
Hi, rubygem-thin package changes from (GPLv2 or Ruby) and MIT to (GPLv2+ or Ruby) and BSD and MIT Regards, Jun Aruga -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25-20160808.n.0 compose check report

2016-08-08 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 35/88 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386) ID: 27755 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27755 ID: 27757 T

Re: Self Introduction: Frederico Lima

2016-08-08 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
Welcome to Fedora. Charalampos Stratakis Associate Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat - Original Message - From: "Frederico Lima (Projeto Fedora)" To: "devel" Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 11:50:46 PM Subject: Self Introduction: Frederico Lima Hi, my name is Frederico

Re: Improvements of Fedora Sponsorship process

2016-08-08 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
I wanted to elaborate on one of the ideas I threw out during that discussion. We (need to|should|strive really hard to) treat new packagers more like new volunteers for fedora infrastructure. Except that we should accept that packaging is really, really hard when you don't know where to start and

Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - lkardos

2016-08-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email addresses in FAS). If they're not int

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - mnagy

2016-08-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:03:52 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still > interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, hav

limb changed jplesnik's package request for perl-Test-Timer in f25 from Awaiting Review to Approved

2016-08-08 Thread notifications
limb changed jplesnik's package request for perl-Test-Timer in f25 from Awaiting Review to Approved https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test-Timer/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedorapro

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - mnagy

2016-08-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:03:52 -0600 > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses > > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the > > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are

Re: [packaging] Needs advice on using ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch

2016-08-08 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 07/08/16 02:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: >> I am currently packaging embree [0] which is required by recent release >> of LuxRender. The bad news is embree >> (https://embree.github.io/downloads.html) is only >> available for 64 bits architectures meaning all others i.e.

Re: Long live YUM!

2016-08-08 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 11:56:20AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > I updated my system today and noticed that one of updated packages was > "yum". Yes, that package manager tool we were supposed to obsolete with > switch to "dnf" few releases ago. > > So I decided to remove it: > > 11:53 root@

Re: Long live YUM!

2016-08-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:39:55 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: ...snip... So, all these have their own upstreams and their own progress on moving to python3. > anaconda-yum-plugins > bodhi-client https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/637 > copr-frontend > createrepo Unlikely I

Re: [packaging] Needs advice on using ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch

2016-08-08 Thread Kevin Kofler
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Igor mentioned it is possible to build embree without that instruction > which is beyond my current skills thus bringing more questions. It is possible to build Embree without SSE3 and beyond (including AVX), i.e., with only SSE2, but, as everything beyond SSE2 is runti

Re: Rawhide and F25 issues affecting QtWebEngine/QupZilla and Chromium

2016-08-08 Thread Kevin Kofler
I wrote: > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363914 > [abrt] qupzilla: base::debug::BreakDebugger(): qupzilla killed by SIGABRT > Apparent cause: selinux-policy > Reason: because "setenforce 0" works around it > F25 affected?: unknown This is now known to also affect F25. > 3. https

Fedora 25 Alpha Freeze

2016-08-08 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hi all, Today's an important day on the Fedora 25 schedule[1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 25 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they will be ma

Re: [packaging] Needs advice on using ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch

2016-08-08 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/08/16 04:05 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > The only impact it would have is on performance. But again, it is not > necessary nor desirable to disable runtime-detected support for vector > instructions. It is only a problem when they are used uncondi

Re: Long live YUM!

2016-08-08 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:50:43PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:39:55 + > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > ...snip... > > So, all these have their own upstreams and their own progress on moving > to python3. > > > anaconda-yum-plugins > > bodhi-client > > https

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG

2016-08-08 Thread jkurik
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG on 2016-08-09 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting for the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki page](https://