Il 03/08/2016 17:07, Chris Murphy ha scritto:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
it seems that the hfsplus-tools package arbitrary renames its executables. This
prevents kde-partitionmanager to fully support HFS+.
I've ope
On 08/03/2016 09:57 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:02:56 +0100,
Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
From list of koji builds [1] rawhide and F25 uses pre 4.8. My question
is kernel-4.7.0-2 doesn't land on F24 and F23 ? , since kernel 4.6
already have a short live and 4.7 fix my cpu-
I've just orphaned pykka (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package
/rpms/pykka/) as I'm no longer using it.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
rkolathu wrote:
> I have been working on the Bodhi web UI redesign project and would
> require your participation to complete the survey given in this email.
None of the offered choices match my actual thoughts about the displayed
user interface parts. Thus it's impossible for me to give useful
an
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 32/82 (x86_64), 5/16 (i386)
ID: 27240 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
UR
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 36/81 (x86_64), 5/16 (i386)
ID: 27338 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
U
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks for the feedback
It will be great if you could share your thoughts on improving the
interface. It will be useful for incorporating that into our survey
which ultimately will benefit the re-design process.
Radhika
On 08/04/2016 04:41 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
rkolathu wrote
Hi all,
This morning, during the automation workshop, I had the occasion of
speaking about this with Pingou and Threebean.
Thanks to Pingou hints, I've created a query to get pending ACL from
pkgdb.
What I'd like to share with you all is the list of users that can
approve/deny ACL requests (older
Hi All,
We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64)
are handled
in terms of "primary" vs "secondary". The definition of what is
primary or secondary
is already handled more in terms of the build artifact outputs (images, LiveCDs,
installers, containers etc) for i686 deli
On 4 August 2016 at 11:07, Peter Robinson wrote:
> All the details of the proposal along with FAQ have been put on a wiki
> page here[1]
> so please go and read it and ask any questions that aren't answered in
> the FAQ here.
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> [1]
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architec
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 11:07, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> All the details of the proposal along with FAQ have been put on a wiki
>> page here[1]
>> so please go and read it and ask any questions that aren't answered in
>> the FAQ here.
>>
Hi, All:
I'm trying to package something that's written in Go, and as soon as
I have the compiled binary installed, the rpmbuild blows up like this:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
Binary file
/q/zaitcev/rpms/BUILDROOT/openstack-swift-2.9.0-1.z5.x86_64/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/hummingbird.debug
mat
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:07 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64)
> are handled
> in terms of "primary" vs "secondary". The definition of what is
> primary or secondary
> is already handled more in terms of the build artif
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 11:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:07 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64)
> > are handled
> > in terms of "primary" vs "secondary". The definition of what is
>
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Hi, All:
>
> I'm trying to package something that's written in Go, and as soon as
> I have the compiled binary installed, the rpmbuild blows up like this:
>
> + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
> Binary file
> /q/zaitcev/rpms/BUILDROOT/openstack-
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:43:40PM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This morning, during the automation workshop, I had the occasion of
> speaking about this with Pingou and Threebean.
> Thanks to Pingou hints, I've created a query to get pending ACL from
> pkgdb.
> What I'd lik
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 11:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:07 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64)
>> > are handled
>> > in
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 15:44 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> I think the solid way to address this is to make each architecture
> independent and don't stop the build for any arch if any other arch
> fails. The total failure state can be figured out once all the arches
> have completed and based on cr
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:07:31PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> [1]
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures
I skimmed all this and I'm still a bit confused.
Will there be one Koji instance compiling for every (current primary +
current secondary) arch?
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:07:31PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> [1]
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures
>
> I skimmed all this and I'm still a bit confused.
>
> Will there be one Koji insta
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 15:56 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:07:31PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures
> >
> > I
On 04/08/16 20:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
The page says that Koji will be modified to run all the per-arch build
tasks to completion even if one fails (as opposed to how it behaves
now, cancelling all the other arch tasks as soon as any one fails), but
a failure of any of them will still constit
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:02 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 04/08/16 20:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > The page says that Koji will be modified to run all the per-arch build
> > tasks to completion even if one fails (as opposed to how it behaves
> > now, cancelling all the other arch tasks as
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:02 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> On 04/08/16 20:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > The page says that Koji will be modified to run all the per-arch build
>> > tasks to completion even if one fails (as opposed to h
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:53:24 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> That error means that the string
> "/q/zaitcev/rpms/BUILDROOT/openstack-swift-2.9.0-1.z5.x86_64" appears
> in one of the files listed in %files. Grep for BUILDROOT in your
> installed file tree to find the culprit(s).
Jerry, thanks a lot, t
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:15:09AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Those do get ported. I didn't mean to be confusing. "buildbot", the
>> Python based build tool, is unlikely to ever be ported. Not that it's
>> a very good tool, but it rem
26 matches
Mail list logo
