Fedora Rawhide-20160726.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Server dvd i386 Server boot x86_64 Server dvd x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 1/6 (x86_64) ID: 26068

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Automatic Provides for Python RPM Packages

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote: > > > Oh! In that case, the documentation could be improved. :) > Have you tested it? Is it reliable? > It worked well enough for me when I was doing the testing and development for getting it upstream. A variant of it also worked for years in M

Missing F25 branch

hi someone can give me the access right also for F25 for these packages? ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/artemis ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/shibboleth-java-support when i selected [1] the branches F25 was not listed my apologize again for the noise,

Re: Missing F25 branch

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:32 AM, gil wrote: > hi > > someone can give me the access right also for F25 for these packages? > > ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/artemis > ​ > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/shibboleth-java-support > > when i selected [1] the b

Packaging FPGA bitstreams

RISC-V is an open source instruction set architecture (ISA). I was broadly looking at what it would take to support RISC-V in Fedora, and as well as the usual things like kernel, GCC, binutils, maybe cross-compilers, and all the stuff that's the same for any new architecture, there is one problem

Re: Missing F25 branch

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 04:32:00PM +0200, gil wrote: > hi > > someone can give me the access right also for F25 for these packages? > > ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/artemis > ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/shibboleth-java-support > > when i selected [1

Re: FESCo - July 2016 Elections - Result announcement

2016-07-26 4:58 GMT+02:00 Jan Kurik : > Greetings, all! > > The elections for FESCo - July 2016 have concluded, and the results > are shown below. > > FESCo is electing 4 seats this time. > A total of 196 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate > could accumulate up to 980 votes (196 * 5). > > The r

Re: Packaging FPGA bitstreams

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > In summary: > > - Compiling the Verilog source code to a bitstream requires highly >proprietary tools and will never be possible in Fedora. > > - Writing the bitstream to the FPGA is possible with GPL tools. > > - There are curre

Re: Missing F25 branch

Il 26/07/2016 16:34, Jon Ciesla ha scritto: On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:32 AM, gil > wrote: hi someone can give me the access right also for F25 for these packages? ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/artemis ​https://admin.fedorapr

[Modularity] Modularity WG Onboarding badge - Theme selection

I would like to ask all the Modularity WG members with voting rights to help us make decision on the right theme for Onboarding badge. ideas can be shared in ticket #466 [1]. The current decision is to choose a model made of legos. As we have not reached the necessary quorum during the Modularity

Re: Packaging FPGA bitstreams

On 07/26/2016 10:36 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: RISC-V is an open source instruction set architecture (ISA). I was broadly looking at what it would take to support RISC-V in Fedora, Yay! great idea, and I hope RISC-V will gain broad acceptance, e.g. in the IOT field. ARM is great and ubiquito

Re: Missing F25 branch

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:55:55PM +0200, gil wrote: >Il 26/07/2016 16:34, Jon Ciesla ha scritto: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:32 AM, gil wrote: > >hi > >someone can give me the access right also for F25 for these packages? > >​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Missing F25 branch

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 06:16:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:55:55PM +0200, gil wrote: > >Il 26/07/2016 16:34, Jon Ciesla ha scritto: > > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:32 AM, gil wrote: > > > >hi > > > >someone can give me the access

Re: Problem configuring Fedora Notifications

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:32:09 +0100 José Abílio Matos wrote: > Hi, > I send this here in case someone has seen this and if not > where to report. I've not seen it before. Best place would be: https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn.web/issues > I want to configure the notifications to receiv

Re: Missing F25 branch

On Ter, 2016-07-26 at 18:29 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 06:16:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:55:55PM +0200, gil wrote: > > > > > >    Il 26/07/2016 16:34, Jon Ciesla ha scritto: > > > > > >  On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:32

Re: Missing F25 branch

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:53:08 +0100 Sérgio Basto wrote: > > The pkgdb side of the mass-branching is now done, so at least this > > part should > > be back to normal. > > > > Do note that some other components such as koji may not have been > > updated yet. > > what is rpms-checks [1] ? > >

Re: Packaging FPGA bitstreams

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:05:23PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > Why are the proprietary bits in this case problematic, if we have > proprietary bits in the context of module (e.g. wireless) firmware > and CPU microcode patches? Right, in fact the proprietary bits have a firmware-like license

Re: FESCo - July 2016 Elections - Result announcement

On Tuesday, 26 July 2016 at 16:53, Haïkel wrote: > 2016-07-26 4:58 GMT+02:00 Jan Kurik : [...] > > Congratulations to the winning candidates, and thank you all > > candidates for running this elections! > > Congratulations to the elected members! Big thanks to everyone who voted and congratulatio

Fedora 25 Mass Branching

Hi All, Fedora 25 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder rawhide/f26 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so this means that anything you do for f25 you also have to do in the master branch and do a build

32-bit RPMs are being duplicated for CPL in the final repository

Hello, this is related to this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230595 CPL is a C library and 32-bit RPMS appear in the x86_64 repository. Who is the right person to ask/where to fill a bug/ if this is an infra issue? Best, Sergio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject

Re: 32-bit RPMs are being duplicated for CPL in the final repository

On 07/26/2016 02:27 PM, Sergio Pascual wrote: Hello, this is related to this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230595 CPL is a C library and 32-bit RPMS appear in the x86_64 repository. Who is the right person to ask/where to fill a bug/ if this is an infra issue? Multilib. I

nice reduction in systemd package size

Hi everyone, systemd 231 was built for rawhide / F25 today, with a bunch of usability and security features, see [1]. Please give it a test. There have been various discussion about reducing the footprint of systemd, this release and the previous one make some progress: 1. Code shared between va

Firefox 48 v Electrolysis

Will Fedora build of FF 48 have this enabled or disabled? Or is this something every user will have to decide upon through options etc.? Thanks, -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 25 Mass Branching

I can't submit update in bodhi as it doesn't look for f25* tags. Builds : Invalid tag: scudcloud-1.31-1.fc25 tagged with [u'f24-updates-candidate', u'f22-updates-candidate', u'epel7-testing-candidate', u'dist-6E-epel-testing-candidate', u'dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate', u'f23-updates-candidate',

Re: Fedora 25 Mass Branching

On 26/07/16 21:00, Peter Robinson wrote: Fedora 25 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder rawhide/f26 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so this means that anything you do for f25 you also have to do

Re: Fedora 25 Mass Branching

Hi, On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I can't submit update in bodhi as it doesn't look for f25* tags. > > Builds : Invalid tag: scudcloud-1.31-1.fc25 tagged with > [u'f24-updates-candidate', u'f22-updates-candidate', > u'epel7-testing-candidate', u'dist-6E-epel-testing-can

Re: Fedora 25 Mass Branching

>> Fedora 25 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull >> --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder >> rawhide/f26 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so >> this means that anything you do for f25 you also have to do in the >> master branch and do a

Fedora Rawhide-20160727.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Server dvd i386 Server boot x86_64 Server dvd x86_64 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tes