Fedora Elections July 2016 - Voting period to start in less than 14 hours

Hi Fedora people, on July 19th at 00:00:00 UTC we are going to start the Voting period of Council and FESCo elections [1]. The Voting period will end on July 25th, 2016 at 23:59:00 UTC. If you are around during this period of time, please go to the Voting machine [2] and provide your votes to Cou

Change to assert() behaviour in Fedora 25

Hi all, One of the changes in PHP7 (which is of course a Fedora 25 Feature Change) is an alteration to the assert() behaviour. The default default behaviour (ie no ini file changes) is to have assert() work as it did in PHP5. The recommended php.ini for production is to have zend.assertions=-1 s

RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

Heya! I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora, and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not proposing a feature according to the feature process for this yet, but my hope is that these discussions will lead to one eventually. Most distributions

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-15)

On 07/16/2016 05:33 AM, Björn Persson wrote: > Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: >> On 07/15/2016 05:19 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >>>* AGREED: FESCo approves KillUserProcess=yes by default with the >>> steps sgallagh has proposed in the ticket (+7, 0, 0) (jwb, >>> 17:04:58) >> >> "Tier 1 packages

Python is updated to 2.7.12

Hello all, Python is updated to 2.7.12 for Rawhide and F24. Release notes: https://hg.python.org/cpython/raw-file/v2.7.12/Misc/NEWS Bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0decbba312 For people who prefer copr for early testing you can enable this repo: dnf copr enabl

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya! > > I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora, > and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not > proposing a feature according to the feature process for this yet, but > my hope is t

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 14:39 +0200: > Heya! > > I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora, > and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not > proposing a feature according to the feature process for this yet, but > my hope is tha

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On 18 July 2016 at 08:39, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya! > > I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora, > and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not > proposing a feature according to the feature process for this yet, but > my hope is that the

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On Mon, 18.07.16 15:59, Ondřej Vašík (ova...@redhat.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 14:39 +0200: > > Heya! > > > > I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora, > > and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not > > proposing

Re: iphone mount in nautilus on Fedora 24

- Original Message - > I did not have gvfs-gphoto2 installed. After installing it I now see > the separate mount. Thanks for your help! > > Let me try to summarize. Can you please correct me if I'm wrong: > > - Before (Fedora 22) I didn't need this because a "generic mount" of the >

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 16:28 +0200: > On Mon, 18.07.16 15:59, Ondřej Vašík (ova...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 14:39 +0200: > > > Heya! > > > > > > I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora, > > > and propose

Fedora Rawhide-20160718.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 28/80 (x86_64), 16/16 (i386) ID: 25535 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https:/

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 4 packages were orphaned bcfg2 [f22, el6, epel7] was orphaned by fab A configuration management system https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/bcfg2 netmonitor

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote: > Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 16:28 +0200: > > On Mon, 18.07.16 15:59, Ondřej Vašík (ova...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > Lennart Poettering píše v Po 18. 07. 2016 v 14:39 +0200: > > > > Heya! > > > > > > > > I'd like to

Re: wiki editing changes

On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 00:41:40 + Christopher wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016, 15:47 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > In order to prevent these spam wiki edits entirely, we have changed > > the wiki to require a user to have both signed the FPCA and be in > > at least one additional group (CLA+1). This

Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

Is anyone else having this issue? Seems it usually takes 3 or more days for me to get something pushed to testing. Is this normal behavior? I usually submit on weekends... is it that bodhi processing doesn't occur on weekends? Also, apparently github is the preferred method or reporting bodhi i

Re: Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

hi Il 18/07/2016 22:49, Gerald B. Cox ha scritto: Is anyone else having this issue? Seems it usually takes 3 or more days for me to get something in my case 4 days ... pushed to testing. Is this normal behavior? I usually submit on weekends... is it that bodhi processing doesn't occur on we

Re: Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

On Seg, 2016-07-18 at 13:49 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > Is anyone else having this issue?  Seems it usually takes 3 or more > days for me to get something pushed to testing.  Is this normal > behavior?  I usually submit on weekends... is it that bodhi > processing doesn't occur on weekends?   ye

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

Lennart Poettering writes: On Fedora, we currently have a "nobody" user that is defined to UID 99. It's defined unconditionally like this. To my knowledge there's no actual use of this user at all in Fedora however. I see distccd running as the nobody user. I also see dnsmasq running as the n

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Lennart Poettering writes: > >> On Fedora, we currently have a "nobody" user that is defined to UID >> 99. It's defined unconditionally like this. To my knowledge there's no >> actual use of this user at all in Fedora however. > > > I see d

Re: Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:49:23 -0700 "Gerald B. Cox" wrote: > Is anyone else having this issue? Seems it usually takes 3 or more > days for me to get something pushed to testing. Is this normal > behavior? I usually submit on weekends... is it that bodhi > processing doesn't occur on weekends?

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: Rust Compiler

On 07/14/2016 05:15 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > Until the Rust ecosystem becomes more stable, it is better to upgrade > it regularly than have a stale tool nobody can really use. > There are even crates that work only with nightlies for now, so trying > to stay on par is necessary to make it useful. Al

Re: Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I could tell you more about your specific updates if you list them... https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-db2fbe6854 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-579b837594 Thanks for the info I was wanting to mak

Re: Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:05:56 -0700 "Gerald B. Cox" wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > I could tell you more about your specific updates if you list > > them... > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-db2fbe6854 > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.

Re: Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Nope, nothing on your side. Looks like there was a push late saturday > and your updates just missed that, and there wasn't one sunday for some > reason so they went out in the one I started this morning. > > It was a little less than 2 days t

Re: Support for PCLMUL, AVX, FMA, etc.

Hi Jerry, I'm kind of resurrecting a dead thread here, but maybe a recent change to GCC has made what you were considering possible. I stumbled upon it when looking for information about optimized extensions for another package. Recently, GCC expanded support for multiversioning. It's in GCC 6,

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG on 2016-07-19 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting for the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki page](https://

Packaging suggestions for Apple Swift Language

All, I’m working on a SPEC file for Apple’s swift programming language. I believe it’s currently working and conforms to the community guidelines but I have some questions: 1) The swift name conflicts with several existing packages. I’m thinking swiftlang would be appropriate as this is similar

Re: Packaging suggestions for Apple Swift Language

On Jul 18, 2016 10:30 PM, "Jeremy Fergason" wrote: > > > 3) Swift relies on LLDB for it’s REPL functionality on linux. This is annoying because it creates a custom version of LLDB that conflicts with the main lldb package. I can’t see anyway around this conflict as it is a core assumption in th

Fedora Elections July 2016 - Voting period has started

Hi, the Voting period of the Fedora Elections on July 2016 has just started. Please vote for your candidates to Council [1] and FESCo [2]. You can vote till July 25th, 2016 at 23:59:00 UTC when the voting ends. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/council-july-2016 [2] https://admin.fe

rpm-build's dependency on perl-generators removed

Perl F25 change, I removed run-time dependency on perl-generators from rpm-build package in rpm-4.13.0-0.rc1.40.fc25 build. This should remove perl from minimal build root. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org