Re: LBNL BSD licence

Haïkel writes: > Do not change shipped license file from upstream. Of course (though Fedora doesn't seem to regard modifying a licence document as much of a legal issue as I do ). I should have said that COPYING is just a pointer to LBNL's st

Re-review to unretire package: python-nikola

Hi, I have submitted python-nikola to unretire the package for rawhide since it is available in the other branches. A review swap is welcome. Regards, -- José Abílio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: Fixing /.autorelabel

On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:11:31PM +0200, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > On 07/04/2016 05:34 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I don't exactly know where to post this, but I guess I have everyone's > > attention on this thread. > > > > Attached are patches which work for me. They could really do with >

Re: Re-review to unretire package: python-nikola

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 4:58:14 PM WEST Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Link to review request? Oops, I knew something was missing. :-) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169 -- José Abílio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/de

Re: Re-review to unretire package: python-nikola

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:13 PM, José Abílio wrote: > Hi, Hi, > I have submitted python-nikola to unretire the package for rawhide > since > it is available in the other branches. Link to review request? > > A review swap is welcome. > > Regards, > -- > José Abílio > -- > devel mailing lis

Re: Re-review to unretire package: python-nikola

On Jul 6, 2016 9:59 AM, "Igor Gnatenko" wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:13 PM, José Abílio wrote: > > Hi, > Hi, > > I have submitted python-nikola to unretire the package for rawhide since > > it is available in the other branches. > Link to review request? > > > > A review swap is we

Fedora Rawhide-20160706.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 23/84 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386) ID: 24804 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/24804 ID: 24807 Te

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2016-07-07 16:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2016-07-07 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. rktime): 2016-07-07 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2016-07-07 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2016-07-07 1

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Unicode 9.0 support

missed this email :( On 5 July 2016 at 23:19, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Is there any point in updating fonts in rawhide to their Unicode 9.0 > versions, before the change is implemented? > With Unicode 9.0 update libraries will be updated with latest UCD stuff. > > Besides the font checki