OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160618.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160619.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 27
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 24.62 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 8/83 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
ID: 23298 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23298
ID: 23307 Te
On Jun 18, 2016 16:30, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:14:29 -0300
> "Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jiri Eischmann
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > KDE has been interested in Flatpak for over a year. They even have a
> > > KDE runtime and a couple of KDE
Hi,
For some time now I have small problems with the `spec.vim` plugin
on f24 (especially with macro expansion). I wanted to do something
about it but after reviewing the code I decided to rewrite the whole
thing. I also wanted to add some new features (make it more like
`rpm-spec-mode` in emacs).
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel tomorrow's QA meeting. I know we
missed last week too, but I figured everyone could do with the time off
after the work on Fedora 24! The only significant thing outstanding, I
think, is working out whether graphical upgrades are ready to go yet:
kparal and I will w
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:45 PM gil wrote:
>
>
> Il 16/06/2016 22:32, Dan Horák ha scritto:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:16:38 +
> Christopher wrote:
>
>
> I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures
> [1] on i686 in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The
>
