It seems that you want to learn something about R, right? Then I'd
suggest you get in touch with the R developers as they have more
experience with it. Here the people have mostly knowledge about Fedora.
It seems that the distribution you run R on seems rather unimportant.
So perhaps you want to t
= Proposed System Wide Change: PHP 7.0 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php70
Change owner(s):
* Remi Collet and PHP SIG
Update the PHP stack in Fedora to latest version 7.0.x
== Detailed Description ==
Update the PHP stack in Fedora to latest version 7.0.x, which brings a
big perfor
On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 at 04:47, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 10:11 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > Could you put this on a page in Fedora wiki and possibly add a link
> > in WebKitGTK+ package description and README file?
>
> Hi,
>
> Just want to let you
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160613.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160614.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:10
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 95
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.95 MiB
Size of dropped packages
OLD: Fedora-24-20160613.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160614.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:12.82 MiB
Size of
8574f75d421b221bb34ee9c58097204a Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat-0.11.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat/Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat-0.11.tar.gz/md5/8574f75d421b221bb34ee9c58097204a/Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 09:59 +0530, Akshay Shipurkar wrote:
> Hi Hamish Brunker
>
> Check out the documentation at the link below
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Installation_Guid
> e/
Hi,
I think we shouldn't be pointing new users at that whole guide; it's
way too compli
Hi everyone,
my name is Oliver and I am working for Red Hat in the internal IT department.
I am responsible for the internal RHEL desktop build we use for our employees.
I maintain extra config packages that we add to the existing Red Hat Enterprise
Linux,
so our employees are getting productive
From db5043144b6016e026553701eaae2caf367bf59e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:43:18 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.11
- New upstream release 0.11
- Be gentle to older toolchains by avoiding the use of Module::Metadata in
configure-requires (CPAN RT#115310)
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 2/83 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 22508 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/22508
ID: 22520 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_
Il 14/Giu/2016 16:46, "Oliver Haessler" ha scritto:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
Welcome Oliver!
> my name is Oliver and I am working for Red Hat in the internal IT
department.
> I am responsible for the internal RHEL desktop build we use for our
employees.
> I maintain extra config packages that we add t
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 16/83 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386)
ID: 22402 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/22402
ID: 22407 T
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:45:36AM -0400, Oliver Haessler wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> my name is Oliver and I am working for Red Hat in the internal IT department.
> I am responsible for the internal RHEL desktop build we use for our employees.
> I maintain extra config packages that we add to the e
Hi everyone,
my name is Oliver and I am working for Red Hat in the internal IT department.
I am responsible for the internal RHEL desktop build we use for our employees.
I maintain extra config packages that we add to the existing Red Hat Enterprise
Linux,
so our employees are getting productive
2016-06-14 16:45 GMT+02:00 Oliver Haessler :
> Hi everyone,
>
> my name is Oliver and I am working for Red Hat in the internal IT department.
> I am responsible for the internal RHEL desktop build we use for our employees.
> I maintain extra config packages that we add to the existing Red Hat
> En
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:28:00 -
"Christian Stadelmann" wrote:
> I like this idea very much, thank you!
>
> Independent to whether this proposal is accepted or not, I'd like to
> point out that it would be very useful to notify all maintainers of
> this issue, probably by filing a bug to every
So I was rather surprised by this Softpaedia article today:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/snap-packages-become-the-universal-binary-format-for-all-gnu-linux-distributions-505241.shtml
It claims that Canonical state that they have been working with Fedora
developers to make this the universal pac
I'm testing it out for Phoronix. The copr works correctly, it installs
fine. Running snapper works fine, once you figure out what the correct
instructions should be (snapcraft.io's instructions are slightly wrong).
Applications appear to run correctly and integrate fine in the Workstation
environm
I'm updating libconfuse to 3.0, which is a soname change. The only
dependency I can find is libftdi, which I'm doing as well.
-j
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 19:26 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> Does anyone in marketing or development now what the article is
> referring
> to and what's going on?
Hi,
There's an article on Ars as well. The "working with Fedora developers"
claim is probably a misunderstanding on Softpedia's part; it'
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
>
> We're also planning to remove Fedora packages for selected
> apps that are offered as Flatpaks by upstream. For instance, if
> (hypothetical) Inkscape were to offer a Flatpak download on their web
> site, the Inkscape developers could
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 19:26 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
>> Does anyone in marketing or development now what the article is
>> referring
>> to and what's going on?
>
> Hi,
>
> There's an article on Ars as well. The "working with Fedora dev
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
On 14/06/16 20:32, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
We have not considered, and need to discuss, whether to allow that
snapcore package into Fedora proper; there's a strong argument to be
made that we should accept all free software, but doing that could
undercut our Flatpak effort. If popular upstreams
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 15:40 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> This is a slight tangent, but by "remove Fedora packages", do you
> mean
> actually remove them from the distribution entirely or simply not
> show the
> packaged version in e.g. GNOME Software in favor of the upstream
> Flatpak?
> The latter m
When DNF will be able to install flatpack pkgs then we can stop supporting
distro packages for that.
-Igor Gnatenko
On Jun 14, 2016 9:33 PM, "Michael Catanzaro" wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 19:26 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> > Does anyone in marketing or development now what the article is
>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 15:40 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > This is a slight tangent, but by "remove Fedora packages", do you
> > mean
> > actually remove them from the distribution entirely or simply not
> > show the
> > packaged version i
On 14/06/16 21:02, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I was thinking remove the Fedora package. What's the point in
maintaining a secret Fedora package for a graphical app, when we're
going to be presenting a different version of that app to users? And as
Josh says, this would also create confusion regard
thanks buddy !
:-)
Worthy agent of Light
Jules Irenge
MSc Student
University of Liverpool
2016-06-14 10:08 GMT+01:00 Martin Ueding :
> It seems that you want to learn something about R, right? Then I'd
> suggest you get in touch with the R developers as they h
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/82 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 22621 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/22621
ID: 22698 Test: i386 universal upgrade_d
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 21:16 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
> Failed openQA tests: 1/82 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> ID: 22621 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm
> URL: https://op
Hi everyone, my name is msamir have several years of experience in
open-source and rpm based distributions.
I am interesting in building RPMs for network applications as I have some
knowledge in this area and want contribute in Fedora Project.
Already read doc - how to create an RPM package,
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 20:53 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> I mean I really hope you're not saying that upstream developers will
> be
> able to start demanding that a third party packager's work is
> removed
> from Fedora!
Hm... it's not supposed to be an antagonistic process. We were
expecting it to
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 16:45 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> Well, if a packager wants to maintain it, why not?
>
> As someone who's a bit skeptical about containers as the future of
> software
> distribution, I'd like to continue getting "traditionally packaged"
> applications from Fedora where possibl
Hi,
You're right, we hadn't yet planned for how to handle spins (at least
I'm unaware of any such plans). Don't worry, nobody's going to start
removing packages if that means making apps inaccessible to folks not
using Workstation. Some compatibility story is clearly needed
beforehand. Igor sugges
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 16:45 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
>> Well, if a packager wants to maintain it, why not?
>>
>> As someone who's a bit skeptical about containers as the future of
>> software
>> distribution, I'd like to continue getting
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 16:45 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> >> Well, if a packager wants to maintain it, why not?
> >>
> >> As someone who's a bit skeptical about containers as the f
On 06/15/2016 04:11 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I *strongly* disagree here. The xdg-app folks seem to be doing a
pretty good job with their sandbox. The kernel attack surface is
reduced considerably, as is the attack surface against the user via
ptrace and filesystem access. If Wayland is av
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 06/15/2016 04:11 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> I *strongly* disagree here. The xdg-app folks seem to be doing a
>> pretty good job with their sandbox. The kernel attack surface is
>> reduced considerably, as is the attack surface ag
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 04:45:25PM -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > I was thinking remove the Fedora package. What's the point in
> > maintaining a secret Fedora package for a graphical app, when we're
> > going to be presenting a different version of that app to users?
>
>
> Well, if a packager want
On 06/15/2016 03:04 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
In the specific case where upstream decides to ship a Flatpak and wants
to distribute that Flatpak in Fedora, then it seems advantageous to
make that available in Fedora rather than our RPMs, so you get updates
from upstream, exactly the way upstre
On 06/15/2016 06:27 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 06/15/2016 04:11 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I *strongly* disagree here. The xdg-app folks seem to be doing a
pretty good job with their sandbox. The kernel attack surface is
reduced
On Jun 14, 2016 11:24 PM, "Florian Weimer" wrote:
>
> On 06/15/2016 06:27 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Florian Weimer
wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/15/2016 04:11 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
I *strongly* disagree here. The xdg-app folks seem to be doing a
>
43 matches
Mail list logo
