libkpmcore soname bump

I intend to update kpmcore and kde-partitionmanager in F24 to version 2.2.0. This will lead to libkpmcore soname bump, I don't expect to cause any problem because at the moment the only package requiring libkpmcore is kde-partitionmanager. Cheers, Mattia -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fed

Re: Proposal: remove insecure WebKitGTK+ packages for F27

I like this idea very much, thank you! Independent to whether this proposal is accepted or not, I'd like to point out that it would be very useful to notify all maintainers of this issue, probably by filing a bug to every package that uses one of these packages (webkitgtk, webkitgtk3), adding a

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160612.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160611.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160612.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 21 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 17.61 MiB Size of dropped packages

Broken dependencies: qt-virt-manager

FTR, this is fixed in testing for a long time now. I still get those nasty mails, though and propably due to the freeze. I filed it as a Freeze Exception: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343159 From: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343159 To: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Re: Broken dependencies: qt-virt-manager

Raphael Groner wrote: > FTR, this is fixed in testing for a long time now. > I still get those nasty mails, though and propably due to the freeze. Your bug is an accepted freeze-exception, and the update https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a7af5e90d1 is queue'd stable, when the p

Re: Broken dependencies: qt-virt-manager

From: build...@fedoraproject.org To: qt-virt-manager-ow...@fedoraproject.org - Sorry for the obviously bad c+p. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160612.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160611.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160612.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of

Fedora Rawhide-20160612.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 16/73 (x86_64), 7/16 (i386) ID: 22018 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.o

Fedora 24-20160612.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Failed openQA tests: 1/79 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 22126 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/22126 ID: 22181 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd URL: h

[Test-Announce] 2016-06-13 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 24 Blocker Review

# F24 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-06-13 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We currently have 2 proposed Final blockers and 3 proposed Final freeze exceptions to review. There are also 3 accepted blockers to check in on. If you have time toda

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2016-06-13 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel tomorrow's QA meeting. This week will just be about getting Final out, I think, and I'm not aware of anything that needs meeting discussion. If you can think of anything, please reply to this mail and we can set up a meeting! Thanks. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA C

Re: Self Introduction: Davide Olivieri

Hi Corey, Thank you for your reply. Right now there isn't a particular area in which I am interested in, other than giving my contribution my main wish is to learn how to build RPM and see how a community Linux OS like Fedora is built. I checked the current orphaned packages and three of them ar

First stage of glibc recvmsg/sendmsg ABI revert landed in rawhide

glibc upstream, during development of the 2.24 release, introduced new symbol versions recvmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmsg@GLIBC_2.24 (and recvmmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmmsg@GLIBC_2.24 on 64-bit architectures), in order to fix some minor POSIX compliance issue. (POSIX and the Linux kernel disagree about th

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!

On Sat, 2016-06-11 at 20:14 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:59 PM, wrote: > > > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.1 is now > > > available for testing. Please help us complete all the valida

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!

On Sun, 2016-06-12 at 23:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2016-06-11 at 20:14 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Peter Robinson > > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:59 PM, wrote: > > > > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.1 is