On 2016-06-08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 08/06/16 15:43 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>On 2016-06-08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> Also, since gcc%{?_isa} **doesn't work** then yes, not using %_isa for
>>> gcc seems sensible! :-)
>>>
>>Why both gcc.i686 and gcc.x86_64 are available in the x86_64 repo
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:02:55AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > Think about it: you can't build 32-bit software **at all** unless you
> > install glibc-devel.i686, not even just "int main() { }" with no
> > headers at all.
> >
> That's because gcc.x86_64 accepts -m32 but cannot produce 32-bit
> exe
On 09/06/16 08:02 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2016-06-08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/16 15:43 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2016-06-08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Also, since gcc%{?_isa} **doesn't work** then yes, not using %_isa for
gcc seems sensible! :-)
Why both gcc.i686 and gcc.x86_64
W dniu 08.06.2016 o 21:15, Kevin Fenzi pisze:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 21:07:26 +0200
> Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>
>> I used 4.7-rc0.git3 kernel for few days. In the morning I did an
>> update to fresh rawhide and then fork() stopped forking.
>>
>> Thunderbird was crashing on start, Chrome refused to
W dniu 09.06.2016 o 00:18, gil pisze:
I have no idea why but most of your mails end in my spam folder ;(
Il 08/06/2016 21:15, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 21:07:26 +0200
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Any ideas (other than "switch to F24/Ubuntu/Debian/Umbaumba" ones)?
the lates
Thanks to Vit for the link, I'd like to see the discussion in:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/312
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The bug was rejected as a blocker but instead it has a suggestion to be a
freeze exception.
You should use official application to properly refile it as a freeze
exception, there's no tracker bug number in the blocks box. FE has its own
tracker.
https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs
- Click
Hi.
My name is Lumir Balhar and I am new member of Python maintenance team
in Red Hat. I will work on porting Python packages to Python 3.
I have no previous experience with RPM packages.
My first review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344245
Have a nice day. Lumir
--
d
On 2016-06-09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 09/06/16 08:02 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>On 2016-06-08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> Think about it: you can't build 32-bit software **at all** unless you
>>> install glibc-devel.i686, not even just "int main() { }" with no
>>> headers at all.
>>>
>>That'
I maintain a package which comes with some benchmarking tools. I
would like to package these, but they have very generic names like
"boot-benchmark", "analysis". Also the tools are very specialized --
you would only want them if you already know you need them.
I wonder if people have opinions o
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I maintain a package which comes with some benchmarking tools. I
> would like to package these, but they have very generic names like
> "boot-benchmark", "analysis". Also the tools are very specialized --
> you would only want them if
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160608.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160609.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 748.06 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Parag Nemade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > See:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338054
> >
> > Pushing a reasonable version of keepassx for f24 is apparently an
> accepted
> > freeze exception,
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 00:18:47 +0200
gil wrote:
> who did you of bad kde?
> regards
I'm not sure I understand the question, but perhaps you mean why don't
I like KDE? I don't have any dislike for KDE. I was simply suggesting
using another DE as a troubleshooting measure. Sometimes breakage is
confi
OLD: Fedora-24-20160608.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160609.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:10
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 15/71 (x86_64), 5/16 (i386)
ID: 21360 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.o
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 09.06.2016 o 00:18, gil pisze:
>
> I have no idea why but most of your mails end in my spam folder ;(
>
> Il 08/06/2016 21:15, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
>>
>>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 21:07:26 +0200
>>> Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>>>
>>
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 21466 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21466
ID: 21537 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fed
> "PR" == Pavel Raiskup writes:
PR> Thanks to Vit for the link, I'd like to see the discussion in:
PR> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/312
Why would you bump a three year old ticket for this? Just open a new
one.
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.f
The decision of the Fedora 24 Final Go/No-Go Meeting is NO-GO.
Due to a blocker bug [1] and subsequently missing Fedora 24 Final RC
compose it has been agreed on the Go/No-Go meeting to slip the Final
release of Fedora 24 for one week.
The next Go/No-Go meeting is planned on the next Thursday 2016
Hi,
We have recently started updating all Fedoras to the latest stable
release of WebKitGTK+ in order to provide effective security support.
I'm pleased that so far we have had no bug reports related to these
updates.
Recently, FESCo wisely adopted a policy to ban stable release updates
that brea
Hi,
during the meeting we were able to check the status with all the team
representatives and there is no know blocking issue, except the NO-GO
status as published at [1].
For more details please check the meeting minutes at [2][3].
Thanks all the participants on the meeting for coming and provid
Hello,
I wish to make a fedora rpm package from my open-source at
http://clownix.net. I am ready to change the licence to gpl if the
current cloonix rpl licence cannot be accepted in the fedora
distribution. Cloonix is an open source to create qemu-kvm machines
and connect them, it is provided as a
I'm not sure I understand the question, but perhaps you mean why don't
I like KDE? I don't have any dislike for KDE. I was simply suggesting
using another DE as a troubleshooting measure. Sometimes breakage is
confined to a particular one and switching to another will allow you to
work around or
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:28:05 AM CEST Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "PR" == Pavel Raiskup writes:
> PR> Thanks to Vit for the link, I'd like to see the discussion in:
> PR> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/312
>
> Why would you bump a three year old ticket for this?
Jason, because
25 matches
Mail list logo
