Re: Is it time to retire rubygem-therubyracer?

2016-05-16 Thread Vít Ondruch
I'll pull the trigger at Friday the 20th, if there is no opposition (and there was no opposition so far). Adding devel into the loop for wider audience. Vít Dne 11.5.2016 v 10:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Hi all, > > I am thinking about retiring therubyracer from Fedora. Please let me > expla

Unresponsive maintainer: Ewan Mac Mahon

2016-05-16 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
I vainly attempted to contact gimp-resynthesizer maintainer[0] for two week to update the plugin to the latest upstream version according to release monitoring[1]. I sent a needinfo to the right email address according to his FAS account without reply. Is there another way to contact Ewan to push

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2016-05-16 Fedora QA Meeting

2016-05-16 Thread Kamil Paral
Hello, I propose to cancel today's QA meeting. We don't have anything critical on the agenda, and the scheduled test days seem to be running fine. Thanks, Kamil ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedorapro

2016-05-16 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 24 Blocker Review

2016-05-16 Thread Kamil Paral
# F24 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-05-16 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 3 proposed Final blockers to review. Please come join us and help us determine which of them are blockers. We'll be missing AdamW at least, so we will definite

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-05-16)

2016-05-16 Thread opensource
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-05-16)

2016-05-16 Thread opensource
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

2016-05-16 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 12.5.2016 v 17:51 Mike Chambers napsal(a): > Hell, if really want to make it simple, why not just /etc/repos.d? +1 -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/ad

python-SecretStorage

2016-05-16 Thread Raphael Groner
Hi, the package python-SecretStorage is looking for a new maintainer. I took it temporarily because it's a dependency for backintime that I'm co-maintainer of. SecretStorage is an (optional) feature of backintime ¹, an alternative would be to disable it and I do not use this feature. There are

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: Replace UDisks2 by Storaged

2016-05-16 Thread Tomáš Smetana
Hello. On Fri, 13 May 2016 15:49:45 -0400 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 05/13/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 13:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> CCing the desktop list, but please keep replies on the Fedora devel > >> list. > >> > >> > >> At today's FE

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2016-05-16 Thread nobody
Change in package status over the last 168 hours 0 packages were orphaned 11 packages were retired - adcli [el6] was retired by sgallagh Active Directory enrollment https://admin.fedoraproj

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160516.n.0 changes

2016-05-16 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-24-20160515.n.1 NEW: Fedora-24-20160516.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:44 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of

Re: python-SecretStorage

2016-05-16 Thread William Moreno
I can take it -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 24-20160516.n.0 compose check report

2016-05-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Failed openQA tests: 7/72 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386) ID: 17650 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/17650 ID: 17654 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedo

Packages seeking new point of contact

2016-05-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. Per https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1575 I have orphaned the following packages. Please take a look at them and see if there's any that you are interested in becoming point of contact on. rpms/YafaRay -- A free open-source raytracing render engine ( master f24 f23 f22 el6

Re: Packages seeking new point of contact

2016-05-16 Thread Paulo Cavalcanti
Two packages are deprecated upstream: YafRay partimage - only supports ext3 Kradio4 requires a deeper interaction with the developer, which should consume some time... The other packages demand very low maintenance and I can still take care of them, if no one objects... The real problem has bee

Non-responsive maintainer: corsepiu

2016-05-16 Thread Richard Shaw
Unfortunately I am in the position that I must initiate the non-responsive maintainer policy for Ralf. The Coin3 package has a serious bug[1] that was only recently uncovered by GCC 6. During the process of figuring out the problem (and solution) I asked the devel list for help. Thanks to those th

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: corsepiu

2016-05-16 Thread Richard Shaw
Helps if I post the link: [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329814 And the original FreeCAD bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323159 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

2016-05-16 Thread Ted W.
I'll jump on the /etc/repos.d bandwagon. It follows a convention commonly found in lots of other configuration directories and I feel it's much more concise and clear than /etc/distro.repos.d. I'm not sure I fully understand the rationale behind using distros.repos.d as the directory name in t

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: corsepiu

2016-05-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 05/16/2016 09:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: Unfortunately I am in the position that I must initiate the non-responsive maintainer policy for Ralf. I apologize for not having responded, but ... The Coin3 package has a serious bug[1] that was only recently uncovered by GCC 6. The big questio

Fedora Rawhide-20160516.n.1 compose check report

2016-05-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 29/72 (x86_64), 6/17 (i386) ID: 17739 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/17739 ID: 17740 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload UR