OLD: Fedora-24-20160430.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160501.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 8/58 (x86_64), 4/15 (i386)
ID: 15387 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/t
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 5/63 (x86_64), 2/16 (i386)
ID: 15460 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15460
ID: 15489 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde
If we assume that image is immutable, how does one expect the applications
configuration and data to be managed? Are there additional ENV handlers
inside the container that might not be present otherwise in the RPM world?
Is there are requirement for volume mounts for certain locations inside the
c
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> OK folks, it's Bad Decision Time.
>
> Today, Node.js 6.0 was released. This is a significant ABI-breaking release,
> which means there is no guarantee that existing modules will work with it at
> all.[1]
>
> Better still, Node.js 5.x is
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel tomorrow's QA meeting. We'll be
focusing on Beta validation this week, I guess, and I don't think there
are any urgent topics to discuss. If anyone has anything that we should
meet about, please do reply to this email and we can go ahead and
schedule the meeting. T
# F24 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2016-05-02
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have no proposed Beta blockers to review right now, but we
do have 3 proposed Beta freeze exceptions, and 8 proposed Final
blockers we can look at.
If you have tim
