According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate Beta-1.1 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
OLD: Fedora-24-20160426.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160427.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upg
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 5/67 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386)
ID: 14743 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/14743
ID: 14748 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_sta
On 28/04/16 08:10, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Beta_1.1_Summary
Is it just me or is there nothing on that page tha
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
it seems, we have first candidate for translation [1].
Especially Spanish.
Although I have mentioned, Fedora Developer Portal should be only in
English, I have to be more open.
In case, folks are interested to have portal in several languages we
have to do it. Definitely.
Hi,
I intent to upgrade qhull to version 2015.2 on rawhide throughout the
next couple of days/near future.
This is a major upgrade, which will introduce API/ABI/SONAME changes and
likely packaging changes, as well. This update will require rebuilds of
several packages and will trigger FTBFSs
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 11/58 (x86_64), 4/15 (i386)
ID: 14827 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.
2016-04-28 15:27 GMT+02:00 Justin W. Flory :
> Hi all,
>
> The Fedora Globalization (G11n) team would probably be the best points
> of contact for this. I'm not sure on the specifics, but I believe Zanata
> is the tool that would be needed.
>
> I am including the G11n list on this reply. More info
As previously discussed on the fedora-devel list, the Node.js SIG has elected to
downgrade Node.js to the 4.x long-term-support branch rather than ship with the
5.x new-feature branch due to its support lifecycle ending this summer.
I have just bumped epoch and built the new 4.x package in Fedora
On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 10:00 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 28/04/16 08:10, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
> > You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
> > locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_2
On 28/04/16 16:31, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 10:00 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 28/04/16 08:10, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
https://fedoraproject.org/
Hello team,
gimpfx-foundry is back to Fedora repository. Step to do is to get other
branches unblocked as I am unable to build the package
at the moment http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13836521
The package database showed the status is approved. I filed the ticket about
the is
The decision of the Fedora 24 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting is NO-GO.
Due to an invalid F24 Beta RC compose [1] has been agreed on the
Go/No-Go meeting to slip the Beta release for one week as well as to
slip the Final GA of Fedora 24.
The next Go/No-Go meeting is planned on the next Thursday 2016-May-05
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 5/67 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386)
ID: 14899 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_selinux
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/14899
ID: 14921 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
URL: https
On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 18:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
> Failed openQA tests: 5/67 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386)
>
> ID: 14899 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_selinux
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.o
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:27:40PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 18:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> > Missing expected images:
> >
> > Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> > Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> >
> > Failed openQA tests: 5/67 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386)
> >
> > ID: 14899 Tes
Hello all,
We're wrapping up the first phase of the Fedora Docker Layered Image
Build Service[0] and the time has come to start thinking about what we as a
Project need to do to formalize what it means to be shipping Docker Layered
Images once we are capable of building and distributing them.
On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 20:49 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:27:40PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 18:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> > > Missing expected images:
> > >
> > > Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> > > Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> > ID: 14937 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
> > URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/14937
>
> This is an openQA issue, the console login code breaks when KVM prints
> a message about clock adjustment...
I believe you'll need to play with the console= kernel cmdline argum
On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 02:49 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > > ID: 14937 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
> > > URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/14937
> >
> > This is an openQA issue, the console login code breaks when KVM prints
> > a message about clock adjustment...
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
