Hi,
On 25-04-16 22:27, opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/w
Hi Dominik,
On 04/25/2016 11:03 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>
> [...]
>> rpms/tinyxml -- A simple, small, C++ XML parser ( master f24 f23 f22 epel7 )
>
> Co-maintainers welcome, as usual.
>
I'd like to co-maintain tinyxml. I've requested commit access.
Thanks,
Till
--
devel mail
Hello François
I think Vtk can be put in the hands of kde-sig group (
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/group::kde-sig/ )
Makes sense since is Qt based and this way we all can touch it
[]'s
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:36 PM, François Cami wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll orphan all my pack
I would like to take enet.
- Original Message -
> From: "François Cami"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Kevin Fenzi"
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 5:36:53 PM
> Subject: orphaning all my packages
>
> Hello,
>
> I'll orphan all my packages at 2PM UTC+2 tomor
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> I would like to take enet.
It's all yours.
> - Original Message -
>> From: "François Cami"
>> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>>
>> Cc: "Kevin Fenzi"
>> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 5:36:53 PM
>> Subject: orphan
Hi,
the commands chfn(1) and chsh(1) have been moved to subpackage
util-linux-user in f24 and rawhide.
The reason for the change is dependence on libuser (and it depends on
glib, libgobject, etc), this dependence and all the necessary
libraries increases size of the minimal system root th
Hi,
I've ack'ed all the requests and orphaned the rest of my packages.
Please note that this is due to a chronic lack of free time and has
nothing to do with Fedora itself. You are a wonderful community :)
All the best,
François
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:36 PM, François Cami wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hey @all,
is there anyone is using kickstart plugin for DNF[0]?
[0]
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf-plugins-extras/blob/master/plugins/kickstart.py
--
-Igor Gnatenko
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedorap
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160425.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160426.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 105
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 2.94 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:16:52PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the commands chfn(1) and chsh(1) have been moved to subpackage
> util-linux-user in f24 and rawhide.
>
> The reason for the change is dependence on libuser (and it depends on
> glib, libgobject, etc), this dependence an
On 26/04/16 13:16, François Cami wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've ack'ed all the requests and orphaned the rest of my packages.
>
> Please note that this is due to a chronic lack of free time and has
> nothing to do with Fedora itself. You are a wonderful community :)
>
> All the best,
> François
>
Thanks f
Hi,
I was wondering why is not package "libva-intel-driver" in Fedora. From
what I understand it should provide driver to allow accelerated video
encoding and decoding on Intel GPUs[1].
License of the package[2] looks good (I am not a lawyer though). I've found
few years old review request[3], but
I would like to ask Base WG to review Release blocking deliverables
for Fedora 24 release. The current list is located at [1].
Please let me know any discrepancies (missing images, wrong
assignment, blocking/non-blocking status, etc.) you might find there.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedor
As far as I can tell it sounds like the driver is doing codec work in the
shader code (for example h264) which is not permitted in Fedora due to
patent issues.
There was a mention of a package on RPM Fusion but I couldn't find it.
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 26 April 2016 at 14:28, František Zatloukal wrote:
> Hi,
> I was wondering why is not package "libva-intel-driver" in Fedora. From
> what I understand it should provide driver to allow accelerated video
> encoding and decoding on Intel GPUs[1].
> License of the package[2] looks good (I am not
On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 10:14, Till Hofmann wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> On 04/25/2016 11:03 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >> rpms/tinyxml -- A simple, small, C++ XML parser ( master f24 f23 f22 epel7
> >> )
> >
> > Co-maintainers welcome, as usual.
> >
>
> I'd li
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 13/54 (x86_64), 15/15 (i386)
ID: 14517 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> As far as I can tell it sounds like the driver is doing codec work in the
> shader code (for example h264) which is not permitted in Fedora due to
> patent issues.
Correct
> There was a mention of a package on RPM Fusion but I couldn't find
On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 2:37:27 PM CDT Jan Kurik wrote:
> I would like to ask Base WG to review Release blocking deliverables
> for Fedora 24 release. The current list is located at [1].
> Please let me know any discrepancies (missing images, wrong
> assignment, blocking/non-blocking status, etc
Hi Tamas,
El Tue, 26 Apr 2016 06:23:37 -
"Tamas Levai" escribió:
> I would like to maintain python-pyo, however, I have no experience
> with Fedora package maintenance. But, I managed to package python-pyo
> with copr.
Since you are not in the packager group yet, you cannot take the
package.
Yes, it's in rpmfusion
Thanks everybody! It'd be great if the package can be separated so we can
have at least free codecs HW accelerated.
2016-04-26 15:05 GMT+02:00 Peter Robinson :
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> > As far as I can tell it sounds like the driver is d
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 2:37:27 PM CDT Jan Kurik wrote:
>> I would like to ask Base WG to review Release blocking deliverables
>> for Fedora 24 release. The current list is located at [1].
>> Please let me know any discrepancies (missing
Hi Eduardo,
I would be grateful, if you could mentor me. I already managed to set-up
my fedora packager environment and to update python-pyo to the latest
version.
Tamas
On 26/04/16 15:14, Eduardo Mayorga Téllez wrote:
Hi Tamas,
El Tue, 26 Apr 2016 06:23:37 - "Tamas Levai"
escribió:
I w
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:24 PM, František Zatloukal
wrote:
> Yes, it's in rpmfusion
>
> Thanks everybody! It'd be great if the package can be separated so we can
> have at least free codecs HW accelerated.
Given it's all built into a single .so file it might not be that easy,
but definitely a RF
On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 15:24, František Zatloukal wrote:
> Yes, it's in rpmfusion
>
> Thanks everybody! It'd be great if the package can be separated so we can
> have at least free codecs HW accelerated.
Does it make sense, though? We'll get tons of bug reports saying
support for encumbered
OLD: Fedora-24-20160425.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160426.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
I have pinged Ryan via twitter to see if he can pick these up or if he
is needing to drop the packages?
On 25 April 2016 at 14:01, Jonathan Underwood
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to contact rrix (Ryan Rix) for some time now to no
> avail. He's unresponsive to bugzilla and his pkgdb registere
On 26.4.2016 13:30, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hey @all,
>
> is there anyone is using kickstart plugin for DNF[0]?
>
> [0]
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf-plugins-extras/blob/master/plugins/kickstart.py
I'm usually interested in the opposite - generating a list suitable for
kicksta
On Seg, 2016-04-25 at 12:46 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérg
On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 18:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2016-04-25 at 12:46 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Willi
l, here's one thing you can look at
> (Dennis may have a better idea):
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/latest-Fedora-/log
> s/global/repoclosure-builddeps.global.log
>
> I'm not sure when that 'latest-Fedora-' symlink is updated
Ah yeah, I've been out of touch with Fedora things for quite a while,
and don't see myself having the bandwidth to be repsonsible any time
soon. Sorry about that, not sure how I've missed your emails 'til now.
I've approved pending python-netifaces ACLs, given ownership of pokerth
to itamarjp (who
Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm gonna try KK's version; if that doesn't work either I'm kinda
> inclined to just leave it to upstream and we can drop open-vm-tools
> from comps / spin-kickstarts, or something.
Anything involving "<< (shift - 1)", including the original version, and
including mine, i
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 01:33 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I'm gonna try KK's version; if that doesn't work either I'm kinda
> > inclined to just leave it to upstream and we can drop open-vm-tools
> > from comps / spin-kickstarts, or something.
>
> Anything involving "<< (
OK folks, it's Bad Decision Time.
Today, Node.js 6.0 was released. This is a significant ABI-breaking release,
which means there is no guarantee that existing modules will work with it at
all.[1]
Better still, Node.js 5.x is only going to be supported until sometime this
summer, because they're
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> OK folks, it's Bad Decision Time.
>
Oh dear... When it starts like this, this is *not* going to be an easy
decision...
That said, here's my thoughts on the options.
> Options:
> 1) Downgrade back to 4.x, downgrading or dropping any mo
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> OK folks, it's Bad Decision Time.
>
> Options:
> 1) Downgrade back to 4.x, downgrading or dropping any modules in the
> collection
> that don't run on that LTS version.
> 2) Stick with 5.x for the life of Fedora 24, handling security ba
37 matches
Mail list logo
