Re: Help needed to fix open-vm-tools for GCC 6 to unblock Rawhide Workstation

2016-04-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:54:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Poking around the current compose status, I noticed that aside from the > freerdp thing I just sent a mail about, another thing is blocking > Rawhide Workstation live image compose: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1

Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matthew Garrett wrote: > Measured boot is a process whereby each component in the boot chain > "measures" the next component. In the TPM 1.x world (which is where most > of us still are), that measurement is in the form of a SHA1 hash of the > next component. So, on a BIOS system, the firmware meas

Re: Help needed to fix open-vm-tools for GCC 6 to unblock Rawhide Workstation

2016-04-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Jerry James wrote: >> Change the definition of VMW_BIT_MASK in lib/include/x86cpuid.h to this: >> >> #define VMW_BIT_MASK(shift) ((int)(long)(((1UL << (shift - 1)) << 1) - >> #1)) > > No, make that: > > #define VMW_BIT_MASK(shift) ((int)(l

Re: Help needed to fix open-vm-tools for GCC 6 to unblock Rawhide Workstation

2016-04-23 Thread John Reiser
GCC 6 does not like this: #define VMW_BIT_MASK(shift) (((1 << (shift - 1)) << 1) - 1) it produces errors: /builddir/build/BUILD/open-vm-tools-10.0.0-3000743/lib/include/x86cpuid.h:912:51: error: result of '-2147483648 << 1' requires 33 bits to represent, but 'int' only has 32 bits [-Werror=sh

Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-23 Thread Björn Persson
Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Measured boot is a process whereby each component in the boot chain > > "measures" the next component. In the TPM 1.x world (which is where > > most of us still are), that measurement is in the form of a SHA1 > > hash of the next component. So, on a

Re: Announce: OpenCV 3.1 in Rawhide

2016-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hello we need rebuild in rawhide : >  > os-autoinst Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- dev

32-bit UEFI (was: Re: Validity of i686 as a release blocker)

2016-04-23 Thread Florian Weimer
On 08/13/2015 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 10:47 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:40:28AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: "Ambivalent" is probably understated here. It's hard to imagine people securing i686 hardware these days to run a Workstation

Re: 32-bit UEFI (was: Re: Validity of i686 as a release blocker)

2016-04-23 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Apr 23, 2016 09:18, "Florian Weimer" wrote: > > On 08/13/2015 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 10:47 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:40:28AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: "Ambivalent" is probably understated here. It's hard

Re: 32-bit UEFI (was: Re: Validity of i686 as a release blocker)

2016-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 09:27 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> > >> Just to this point - if we wanted to support the Baytrail tablets > >> properly we should probably get 64-on-32 working. Allowing 32-bit > UEFI > >> installs probably isn't something we want to do officially. > > > > > > Has t

Re: 32-bit UEFI

2016-04-23 Thread Florian Weimer
On 04/23/2016 05:27 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Apr 23, 2016 09:18, "Florian Weimer" wrote: On 08/13/2015 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 10:47 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:40:28AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: "Ambivalent" is prob

Re: 32-bit UEFI

2016-04-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 19:54 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >  > > I am not sure there has been a very large amount of people > > interested in > > doing the work or looking at IoT on i386 since the majority of the > > hardware > > is arm and has no eufi > It's not about i386, it's about booting x86_6

[Important] Help needed for ruby script in f24-backgrounds for beta release

2016-04-23 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Is there anyone understanding Ruby code? If so, would someone help fixing the code to generate files for supplemental wallpapers [1] for f24-backgrounds package as soon as possible because the current script seems no longer work on that below example: $ ruby generate-files.rb generate-files.rb:24:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160423.n.0 changes

2016-04-23 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160422.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160423.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 110 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 2.88 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora Rawhide-20160423.n.0 compose check report

2016-04-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 49/54 (x86_64), 15/15 (i386) ID: 14070 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/t

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160423.n.0 changes

2016-04-23 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-24-20160422.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160423.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 192.18 KiB Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size

Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-23 Thread Lars Seipel
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 02:57:55PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Remote attestation is a mechanism by which […] > > How does the remote machine know that what is answering is a physical TPM > and not a software emulation? Does it need to have the individual TPM's > publ

Fedora 24-20160423.n.0 compose check report

2016-04-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Failed openQA tests: 6/59 (x86_64), 16/16 (i386) ID: 14141 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/14141 ID: 14145 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_servic

Re: [Important] Help needed for ruby script in f24-backgrounds for beta release

2016-04-23 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Nevermind. I figured out the problem within the codes. f24-backgrounds with supplemental wallpapers will be ready later weekend. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net 0xD8A2609A.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.as