Fedora Rawhide-20160407.n.5 compose check report

2016-04-08 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160331.n.0: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Soas raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz ar

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

2016-04-08 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 8.4.2016 v 04:03 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): > Has this change and the mapping which buildroot uses dnf rsp. yum been > reflected to the mock packages [1]? Yes. Mock used DNF for rawhide for ages to test this setup before it landed in Koji and we have been waiting for necessary code change in

TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-08 Thread Matthew Garrett
Some people who installed the Fedora 24 Alpha from scratch on bare-metal BIOS-based systems may have found that their system didn't boot. Sorry about that - it's my fault, and it's fixed now. But it happened as a result of some new code in grub that gives us some really exciting functionality.

Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-08 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: [snip] > Remote attestation is a mechanism by which a remote machine can request > (but not compel) another machine to provide evidence of the PCR state. > The TPM provides a signed bundle of information including the PCR values > and the even

Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-08 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2016-04-08, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Doing this well involves knowing what the expected values are to begin > with. Some of these values come from the firmware, and so we can't do > much about them without the assistance of the system vendors. But these > values don't tend to change over the

Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-08 Thread Florian Weimer
On 04/08/2016 10:28 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > With what we now know about malicious actors targeting the system boot > chain (even down to the firmware), this kind of TPM-based work is a > vital part of helping keep our users secure. On the other hand, it can easily be abused to restrict user

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160408.n.0 changes

2016-04-08 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160407.n.5 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160408.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 19 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 340.24 KiB Size of dropped packages:762.26 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 324.88

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

2016-04-08 Thread Vít Ondruch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 This applies just for Rawhide, right? Vít Dne 7.4.2016 v 18:40 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > Hi All, > > Following the decision of FPC that weak deps must not be installed into the > buildroot[1] koji has been changed to set install_weak_deps to 0

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

2016-04-08 Thread Honza Šilhan
> From: "Kevin Fenzi" > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 07:54:36 -0400 > Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Stephen Gallagher > > wrote: > > > On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > >>> "PP" == Petr Pisar writes: > > >> > > >> PP> This changes meaning regarding to F

Fwd: Broken dependencies: trustedqsl

2016-04-08 Thread Richard Shaw
I not sure what's going on here. I keep getting these emails but it's showing fc24 but I've built a rawhide package since then (showing fc25 dist tag): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750028 trustedqsl has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: tqsllib-

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160408.n.0 changes

2016-04-08 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-24-20160407.n.2 NEW: Fedora-24-20160408.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-08)

2016-04-08 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/08/2016 12:30 AM, Parag Nemade wrote: > Hi, >Please note that I feel only one ticket is there in this week that > need discussion. If any other existing open ticket need to be > discussed then we can discuss that in the meeting but I am adding only > one new ticket on the Agenda of this m

Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-08 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016, at 05:23 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > I'm curious how you would predict hash of initramfs because it is > generated on the host and depends on dracut configuration and presence > of various optionally installed packages. That's true for a system managed by yum/dnf, but rpm-ostre

Fedora Rawhide-20160408.n.0 compose check report

2016-04-08 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 No images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160407.n.5 No images in Rawhide-20160407.n.5 but not this. Fail

Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-08 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016, at 05:36 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > Remote attestation only works with a trusted counterpart who rejects > access once a breach is detected. Who do you expect to be the > counterpart for Fedora users? Is there anyone who offers such a service > without also requiring to u

Fedora 24-20160408.n.0 compose check report

2016-04-08 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 No images in this compose but not 24-20160407.n.2 No images in 24-20160407.n.2 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 3/53 (x86_6

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

2016-04-08 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Friday, April 8, 2016 1:02:40 PM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote: > This applies just for Rawhide, right? > > Vít Nope, we have no way to set it for just one target. everything using dnf has it set. Dennis > Dne 7.4.2016 v 18:40 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > > Hi All, > > > > Following the decision of

Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-08 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:09:23AM +, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > The TPM style of remote attest is quite unfriendly to free software. > It puts basically the entire operating system in the trusted domain, > and you cannot change even a bit of it without "breaking the seal". > So if you want any

Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-08 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:23:07AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > I'm curious how you would predict hash of initramfs because it is > generated on the host and depends on dracut configuration and presence > of various optionally installed packages. initrd is certainly a more difficult one. One thing

Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

2016-04-08 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:36:33AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 04/08/2016 10:28 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > With what we now know about malicious actors targeting the system boot > > chain (even down to the firmware), this kind of TPM-based work is a > > vital part of helping keep our us

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2016-04-08)

2016-04-08 Thread Parag Nemade
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-04-08) === Meeting started by paragan at 17:00:07 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-04-08/fesco.2016-04-08-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary -

Re: Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2016-04-08)

2016-04-08 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 12:08:21AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-04-08/fesco.2016-04-08-17.00.log.html [...] 18:01:51 No one reads the FESCo minutes... ^ FALSE! :) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- devel maili

Planned Outage: buildsystem and related - 2016-04-12 21:00 UTC

2016-04-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Planned Outage: buildsystem and related - 2016-04-12 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2016-04-12 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-04-

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160408.n.1 changes

2016-04-08 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160408.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160408.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 80 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.13 GiB Size of

[Test-Announce] 2016-04-04 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 24 Blocker Review

2016-04-08 Thread Adam Williamson
# F24 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-04-11 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have a few proposed blockers to review, so let's take a look at them. There is 1 proposed Beta blocker and there are 2 proposed Final blockers...so it might be a sh

[Test-Announce] 2016-04-11 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2016-04-08 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2016-04-11 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again on Monday! We have a few follow ups from last week and an upcoming Test Day,

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160408.n.1 changes

2016-04-08 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-24-20160408.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160408.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 74 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 484.57 KiB Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 686.37 MiB Size of

Fedora Rawhide-20160408.n.1 compose check report

2016-04-08 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 No images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160408.n.0 Images in Rawhide-20160408.n.0 but not this

Fedora 24-20160408.n.1 compose check report

2016-04-08 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Images in this compose but not 24-20160408.n.0: Kde live i386 Xfce live x86_64 Mate live i386 Mate live x86_64 Scientific_kde live x86_64 Kde live x86_64 Jam_kde live x86_64 Cinnamon live i386 Games

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160408.n.2 changes

2016-04-08 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160408.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160408.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 55 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.62 MiB Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 257.14 MiB

Re: Error while retiring breathe

2016-04-08 Thread Dave Johansen
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:09:11 -0700 > Dave Johansen wrote: > > > I'm renaming breathe [1] to python-breathe [2]. I just tried to retire > > breathe in f22 using the instructions on the wiki [3] and got the > > following error: > > Could not reti