Re: pushed package to stable four days ago, is it stuck?

On 04/05/2016 08:55 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: >> >> I pushed glusterfs-3.7.9-1.fc23 to stable four days ago. It has +4 karma. >> >> It's still pending. Is it stuck? Can someone please give it a kick? > > All the updates are already in proce

Re: pushed package to stable four days ago, is it stuck?

>>> I pushed glusterfs-3.7.9-1.fc23 to stable four days ago. It has +4 karma. >>> >>> It's still pending. Is it stuck? Can someone please give it a kick? >> >> All the updates are already in process of being kicked by me, should >> hopefully be moving again shortly. >> > > Thanks, > > I have sever

NUnit test in Monodevelop

Hi all, in monodevelop (f24,f25) don't work NUnit test. I can not create NUnit test from IDE. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: NUnit test in Monodevelop

> From: "Ilia Gradina" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 12:47:15 PM > Subject: NUnit test in Monodevelop > > Hi all, Hi, > in monodevelop (f24,f25) don't work NUnit test. I can not create NUnit test > from IDE. Some more details? What it says?

Re: iproute package split

Hi, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:01:14PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > I am in the process of splitting the 'tc' utility off from iproute > package. The motivation for this comes from two things: After considering your feedback (thanks!) and just going for it (thereby messing up Rawhide a bit), I am

Re: NUnit test in Monodevelop

it function (create NUnit test from IDE) work on monodevelop(v.5.9.7) in f23. On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:55 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > From: "Ilia Gradina" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 12:47:15 PM > > S

Re: pushed package to stable four days ago, is it stuck?

On 04/07/2016 06:45 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: I pushed glusterfs-3.7.9-1.fc23 to stable four days ago. It has +4 karma. It's still pending. Is it stuck? Can someone please give it a kick? >>> >>> All the updates are already in process of being kicked by me, should >>> hopefully be m

Re: NUnit test in Monodevelop

Hello Ilia, >> > in monodevelop (f24,f25) don't work NUnit test. I can not create NUnit >> > test >> > from IDE. I am one of the maintainers of the Fedora monodevelop package. Please create a bug for it at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Product: Fedora, Component: monodevelop I will try to have a

Re: pushed package to stable four days ago, is it stuck?

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: > On 04/07/2016 06:45 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > I pushed glusterfs-3.7.9-1.fc23 to stable four days ago. It has +4 karma. > > It's still pending. Is it stuck? Can someone please give it a kick? All the updates are alre

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "PP" == Petr Pisar writes: > > PP> This changes meaning regarding to F25. Previous text banned rich > PP> strong dependencies in F24 only. This current text extends the ban > PP> to all Fedoras. > > PP> Is that intentional? > > It's cur

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> "PP" == Petr Pisar writes: >> >> PP> This changes meaning regarding to F25. Previous text banned rich >> PP> strong dependencies in F24 only. This current text extends the ban >>

Re: NUnit test in Monodevelop

ok, bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com//show_bug.cgi?id=1324824 On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:24 PM Timotheus Pokorra < timotheus.poko...@solidcharity.com> wrote: > Hello Ilia, > > >> > in monodevelop (f24,f25) don't work NUnit test. I can not create NUnit > >> > test > >> > from IDE. > > I am one of th

[Modularity] WG Meeting in 2 hours at 15h UTC in #fedora-meeting

Please join us in #fedora-meeting in about 2 hours (15h UTC). Please feel free to propose any agenda items here or during the roll call of the meeting. Agenda: * Governance * What & when Langdon PS: the proposed governance wiki page should be updated by then[1] PPS: you can find the calendar

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 01:09:11PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:01:14PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > I am in the process of splitting the 'tc' utility off from iproute > > package. The motivation for this comes from two things: > > After considering your feedbac

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 12:55 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > If you have: > > (main package) > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release > > %package tc > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release > > Both subpackages should get installed on upgrade. This is a good trick; I've

How to fix broken dependency in orphaned package that FTBFS in F24

Hi all. We pushed an update for log4cplus in F24+ [1]. It is a rebase and one of the dependent packages is "pion-net". The problem is that pion-net does not build on F24+, which stops us from pushing update on F24 which would not break dependencies. There is an older build of pion-net in F24 fr

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On 02/04/16 13:58 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 02/04/16 12:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>> I've just submitted >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 >>> >>> This update does two things: >>> >>> - Updates python to

Re: How to fix broken dependency in orphaned package that FTBFS in F24

On 7 April 2016 at 14:26, Tomas Hozza wrote: > Hi all. > > We pushed an update for log4cplus in F24+ [1]. It is a rebase and one of > the dependent packages is "pion-net". The problem is that pion-net does not > build on F24+, which stops us from pushing update on F24 which would not > break depe

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:07:01AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 12:55 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > If you have: > > > > (main package) > > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release > > > > %package tc > > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release

Re: NUnit test in Monodevelop

Do you try this? NUnit TestAdapter including NUnit 2.6.4 framework Ref: http://blog.wildsky.cc/posts/nunit-3-0-1-not-working/ Ilia Gradina 於 2016年4月7日 週四 下午7:59寫道： > ok, > bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com//show_bug.cgi?id=1324824

Re: iproute package split

On 04/07/2016 04:07 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 12:55 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: If you have: (main package) Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release %package tc Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release Both subpackages should get installed on upg

Re: How to fix broken dependency in orphaned package that FTBFS in F24

On 04/07/2016 02:26 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote: Hi all. We pushed an update for log4cplus in F24+ [1]. It is a rebase and one of the dependent packages is "pion-net". The problem is that pion-net does not build on F24+, which stops us from pushing update on F24 which would not break dependencies. T

ppisar uploaded Lucy-0.5.0.tar.gz for perl-Lucy

c5f27bea81bc60625c07fb3e6622c4d4 Lucy-0.5.0.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Lucy/Lucy-0.5.0.tar.gz/md5/c5f27bea81bc60625c07fb3e6622c4d4/Lucy-0.5.0.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de..

Re: iproute package split

Hi, On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:55:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > If you have: > > (main package) > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release > > %package tc > Obsoletes: %{name} < the-new-version-release > > Both subpackages should get installed on upgrade. Oh, this is awe

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On 04/07/2016 07:28 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: On 02/04/16 13:58 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: On 02/04/16 12:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: I've just submitted https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 This update does two things: -

perl-Lucy-0.5.0-1.fc25 changed license

perl-Lucy-0.5.0-1.fc25 changed license from (ASL 2.0) to (ASL 2.0 and MIT). -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How to fix broken dependency in orphaned package that FTBFS in F24

On 7 Apr 2016 15:58, "Kalev Lember" wrote: > > On 04/07/2016 02:26 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote: >> >> Hi all. >> >> We pushed an update for log4cplus in F24+ [1]. It is a rebase and one of the dependent packages is "pion-net". The problem is that pion-net does not build on F24+, which stops us from push

Re: iproute package split

On 7 Apr 2016 16:07, "Phil Sutter" wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:55:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > If you have: > > > > Maybe you already thought about this, but I'd add > > Recommends: iproute-tc to the main package, and > > I guess that's merely a hint, rig

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 07:54:36 -0400 Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>> "PP" == Petr Pisar writes: > >> > >> PP> This changes meaning regarding to F25. Previous text banned > >> PP>

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:28:37 +0200 Jan Pokorný wrote: ...snip... > Does bodhi allow to specify several builds as a means of an atomic > (non-racy) override? Should I file a RFE for that if not? Seems to already be filed: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/777 kevin pgp26KpVpULcF

Re: Error while retiring breathe

On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:09:11 -0700 Dave Johansen wrote: > I'm renaming breathe [1] to python-breathe [2]. I just tried to retire > breathe in f22 using the instructions on the wiki [3] and got the > following error: > Could not retire package: Error while decoding JSON: Expecting value: > line 1 c

changing project homepage in apps and pkgdb

How do you change the homepage listed in a project's apps page and "upstream" in pkgdb (e.g. in https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/powerman and the different one in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/powerman/)? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.f

Re: python F23 update testing needed

On 07/04/16 09:41 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:28:37 +0200 > Jan Pokorný wrote: > > ...snip... > >> Does bodhi allow to specify several builds as a means of an atomic >> (non-racy) override? Should I file a RFE for that if not? > > Seems to already be filed: > > https:/

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 04:35:49PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > On 7 Apr 2016 16:07, "Phil Sutter" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:55:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > If you have: > > > > > > > > > Maybe you already thought about this, but I'd add >

Re: changing project homepage in apps and pkgdb

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:12:19PM +0100, Dave Love wrote: > How do you change the homepage listed in a project's apps page and > "upstream" in pkgdb (e.g. in > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/powerman and the different one > in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/powerman/)?

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:35:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 04:35:49PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 7 Apr 2016 16:07, "Phil Sutter" wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:55:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: >

weakdeps and the buildroot

Hi All, Following the decision of FPC that weak deps must not be installed into the buildroot[1] koji has been changed to set install_weak_deps to 0. What this means is that some builds may fail due to missing things. if you encounter this the correct fix is to add BuildRequires to you package

Re: changing project homepage in apps and pkgdb

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 07:44:21PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:12:19PM +0100, Dave Love wrote: > > How do you change the homepage listed in a project's apps page and > > "upstream" in pkgdb (e.g. in > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/powerman and the diffe

Can't request commit access after requesting an EPEL 7 branch

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pg_top/ I requested that an EPEL 7 branch be created for pg_top and it was granted, but now I can't request commit access for the other branches. Is this a known issue? Is there a workaround? Thanks, Dave -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapro

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:40:18AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi All, > > Following the decision of FPC that weak deps must not be installed into the > buildroot[1] koji has been changed to set install_weak_deps to 0. What this > means is that some builds may fail due to missing things. Cou

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:04:58PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > In this case the package doesn't depend explicitly on rubygem-rdoc (a > bug, I think). I'll try to add that and see if it makes a difference. FWIW adding `BuildRequires: rubygem(rdoc)' fixed this. Is it strange that dnf thinks

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160407.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160406.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160407.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 79 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.40 MiB Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.43 GiB Size of

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:04:58PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > In this case the package doesn't depend explicitly on rubygem-rdoc > > (a bug, I think). I'll try to add that and see if it makes a > > difference. > > FWIW adding `BuildRequires: rubygem(rdoc)'

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:39:18PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:04:58PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > In this case the package doesn't depend explicitly on rubygem-rdoc > > > (a bug, I think). I'll try to add that and see if it mak

Fedora 24-20160407.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 No images in this compose but not 24-20160406.n.0 Images in 24-20160406.n.0 but not this: Lxde live x86_64 Mate live i386 Mat

Re: Fedora 24-20160407.n.1 compose check report

On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 22:32 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Kde live i386 > Workstation live i386 > Kde live x86_64 > Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > Workstation live x86_64 So all the live image builds for this compos

Re: weakdeps and the buildroot

On 04/07/2016 06:40 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Hi All, Following the decision of FPC that weak deps must not be installed into the buildroot[1] koji has been changed to set install_weak_deps to 0. What this means is that some builds may fail due to missing things. if you encounter this the corre

[Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Branched 20160407.n.2 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 24 Branched 20160407.n.2. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: iproute package split

On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 17:46 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > It might seem better but it doesn't work. > > Obsoletes are matched on package names only, and %{name}%{isa} in  > packages is in the package provides so the ends never meet and > nothing  > gets obsoleted. Thanks for pointing this out..

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160407.n.2 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160407.n.1 NEW: Fedora-24-20160407.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-08)

Hi, Please note that I feel only one ticket is there in this week that need discussion. If any other existing open ticket need to be discussed then we can discuss that in the meeting but I am adding only one new ticket on the Agenda of this meeting. Following is the list of topics that will be

Re: iproute package split

On 04/07/2016 09:12 PM, Phil Sutter wrote: On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:35:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 04:35:49PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: On 7 Apr 2016 16:07, "Phil Sutter" wrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:55:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewsk

Fedora 24-20160407.n.2 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 No images in this compose but not 24-20160407.n.1 No images in 24-20160407.n.1 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 4/53

Re: Fedora 24-20160407.n.2 compose check report

On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 05:48 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Kde live i386 > Workstation live i386 > Kde live x86_64 > Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > Workstation live x86_64 Unfortunately the lives all failed again, fo

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On 5. 4. 2016 at 10:08:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:27:36 +0200 > > Jan Zelený wrote: > > Is there an estimate as to when the tooling (doesn't matter if it's > > mash or pungi) might be ready? Looking at the IRC log, it doesn't say > > what is the plan. > > I have no idea. :)