Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto > > or r

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

On Thursday, March 31, 2016 11:29:01 PM CDT Kalev Lember wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHow

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Thursday, March 31, 2016 11:29:01 PM CDT Kalev Lember wrote: >> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo >> meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. >> >> To convert UTC to your local ti

"Unexpected dependencies" from ppc64le build

I get this causing a failed build on fedora-22-ppc64le but the package builds OK on x86. Can anyone suggest why and what to do about it? If it's due to the build procedure, it's buried in cmake, which is pretty much beyond my ken... cd /builddir/build/BUILD/libomp_oss/src && /usr/bin/perl /bu

Re: "Unexpected dependencies" from ppc64le build

On 04/01/2016 09:04 AM, Dave Love wrote: > I get this causing a failed build on fedora-22-ppc64le but the package > builds OK on x86. Can anyone suggest why and what to do about it? If > it's due to the build procedure, it's buried in cmake, which is pretty > much beyond my ken... > > cd /buil

Re: "Unexpected dependencies" from ppc64le build

On 04/01/2016 05:16 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > check-depends.pl appears to be part of libiomp, so I think it's an issue about > what it thinks is an okay dependency. ld64.so.2 may be a ppc64/le specific > library that the libiomp developers haven't encountered before. It's the name of the ELF

Reviews swap

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, I have three pending reviews: - - parmetis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323227 - - GTEngine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318381 - - rubygem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289 I will b

Re: Reviews swap

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:52:06PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > I have three pending reviews: > > - - parmetis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323227 > - - GTEngine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=131838

Re: "Unexpected dependencies" from ppc64le build

Orion Poplawski writes: > check-depends.pl appears to be part of libiomp, so I think it's an issue about > what it thinks is an okay dependency. ld64.so.2 may be a ppc64/le specific > library that the libiomp developers haven't encountered before. Thanks. I'm not awake, saw it as an rpm check

Re: Reviews swap

Antonio Trande writes: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > I have three pending reviews: > > - - parmetis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323227 I'm not getting through to that at present, but as far as I can tell, parmetis is (still) non-free

No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

Greetings. Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to correctly handle these new dependencies. At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintainers to not use rich boolean Requires/Recommends for the t

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-04-01) === Meeting started by kalev at 17:00:38 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-04-01/fesco.2016-04-01-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary ---

Re: Firefox not working anymore over ssh?

On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:22:31 +0200, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Then it was probably broken by this update: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606ca05253 > > The "LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1" workaround fixed it for me as > well (running Iceweasel on a r

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run > into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to > correctly handle these new dependencies. > > At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintain

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run > into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to > correctly handle these new dependencies. > > At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintain

Support for PCLMUL, AVX, FMA, etc.

I am one of the maintainers of the ntl package, which is used by some numeric applications (e.g., Macaulay2 and sagemath). Upstream supports use of the PCLMUL instruction, the AVX instructions, and the FMA instructions to speed up various computations. We can't use any of those in Fedora, since w

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 16:11:24 -0400 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run > > into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to > > correctly handle these new

Re: Support for PCLMUL, AVX, FMA, etc.

On 04/01/2016 10:32 PM, Jerry James wrote: > Yesterday I sent a patch upstream that uses gcc's indirect function > support together with __attribute__((target ...)) to build vanilla > x86_64, PCLMUL-enabled, AVX-enabled, and FMA-enabled varieties of > several functions. Upstream was initially exc

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160401.n.2 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160330.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160401.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 147 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 678.71 KiB Size of dropped packages:21.75 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 1.14 GiB Size of

Fedora 24-20160401.n.2 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Images in this compose but not 24-20160330.n.0: Kde live i386 Xfce live x86_64 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Astronomy_kde live x86_64 Astronomy_kde live i386 Soas live x86_64 Xfce live i386 Wor

Re: Firefox not working anymore over ssh?

On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 21:30 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:22:31 +0200, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > Then it was probably broken by this update: > >  > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606ca05253 > >  > > The "LIBGL_DRI3_DI

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-01)

Pungi uses yum still not dnf. Dennis On April 1, 2016 1:58:50 PM CDT, Kalev Lember wrote: >=== >#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-04-01) >=== > > >Meeting started by kalev at 17:00:38 UTC. The full logs are available >at >https://meetbot