> I have orphaned those packages and they need a new point of contact:
…
Taken two of them:
rpms/python-pytest-capturelog (master)
rpms/python-rply (master)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
2016-03-26 14:27 GMT+01:00 Ville Skyttä :
> The following packages in current rawhide install files to
> /etc/tmpfiles.d. They should most likely be fixed to install those
> files to /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d instead.
>
> $ dnf -q repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --qf=%{NAME}
> "/etc/tmpfi
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160330.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160331.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 77
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.63 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 1.25 GiB
Size
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160330.n.0
No images in Rawhide-20160330.n
With my upstream hat on, I'm all for a MUST, because it's the only way that
upstream can control what goes into Fedora. Without checking signatures or
tarball hashes, it's too easy to end up with questionable code.
But the MUST has some implications:
1) The packager's trust-building activities in
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 01:39:17PM -, Ralf Senderek wrote:
> But the MUST has some implications:
>
> 1) The packager's trust-building activities into the public key are by no
> means optional.
Yes, the whole exercise would be pointless otherwise.
> 2) Patches, that are applied to the signed
First and foremost, I would like to point out that we have a modularity
calendar in fedocal[1]. We will schedule meetings there and, likely,
send a note to devel@ for each meeting with an agenda, etc.
I would also like to formally invite the Fedora Base WG and Envs &
Stacks members to the new
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I don't buy that reasoning. You sign stuff to prevent silent
> modification (because of malice or corruption), and not to track
> changes, we have better mechanisms for that.
Signing is much more than an integrity proof for which hash values would
suffice.The
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 07:30:30AM -0700, Langdon White wrote:
> First and foremost, I would like to point out that we have a
> modularity calendar in fedocal[1]. We will schedule meetings there
> and, likely, send a note to devel@ for each meeting with an agenda,
> etc.
> [1]: https://apps.fedorap
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:39:41PM -, Ralf Senderek wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I don't buy that reasoning. You sign stuff to prevent silent
> > modification (because of malice or corruption), and not to track
> > changes, we have better mechanisms for that.
>
> Signing is
Please see below for the log/minutes of the first Modularity WG meeting.
Please note, not terribly awesome at zodbot, so, forgot to #info or
whatever that we would table the "what to do and by when" discussion
until after the "how to do stuff" discussion. We ran out of time, so
that will be on
Hi,
old versions of pacman (the arch linux installer) will stop working
with new packages after April 23rd [1].
I'm updating pacman in all Fedora releases to the latest version. This
means that libalpm will be bumped incompatibly, but I don't expect
anyone to be linking to it.
[1]
https://www.a
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> condor
Fixed using the %{_tmpfilesdir} macro
--
Ben Cotton
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The Fedora 24 Alpha for aarch64 is here, right on schedule for our planned June
final release. Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site:
- Get Fedora 24 Alpha Server
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/24_Alpha/Server/aarch64/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Arch
On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 12:06 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Kde live i386
> Workstation live i386
> Kde live x86_64
> Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> Kde raw-xz armhfp
> Minimal raw-xz armhfp
> Workstation live x86_64
>
The Fedora 24 Alpha for POWER is here, right on schedule for our planned June
final release. Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site:
- Get Fedora 24 Alpha Workstation https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/
prerelease/
- Get Fedora 24 Alpha Server https://getfedora.org/en/server/prerelease
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-04-01 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets below
Hi,
I'm looking for reviewers for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322993
python-cma - Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy numerical optimizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
neurord - Stochastic reaction-diffusion simulator
I'll be happy to review
Hi
catch
can you take this for me?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316196
thanks in advance
.g
Il 31/03/2016 23:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm looking for reviewers for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322993
python-cma - Covariance Matrix Adaptat
2016-03-31 0:51 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 19:55:54 +0100
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Packagers, members of the fedorabugs group and people having a
>> 'watchbugzilla' ACL in pkgdb must have a bugzilla account attached to
>> the email they set in the Fedora
I've just submitted
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06
This update does two things:
- Updates python to version 2.7.11
- Splits out the python macros into separate packages
It would be helpful if packagers would try building python packages with
these packages inst
21 matches
Mail list logo
